ISSN: 2476-2067

Toxicology: Open Access
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Research Article   
  • Toxicol Open Access, Vol 10(2)

Effect of Gasoline Fumes on Blood and Urine Parameters of Attendants (non-smokers) among Different Age-Groups and Brands (PSO, SHELL and CALTEX) of Gasoline Filling Station in Multan, Pakistan

Sajid Hussain*, Rubaida Mehmood, Fatima Iqbal and Sajjad Yousaf
Department of Radiotherapy, Multan Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy, Multan, Pakistan
*Corresponding Author: Sajid Hussain, Department of Radiotherapy, Multan Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy, Multan, Pakistan, Tel: 923006861199, Email: sajid9596@gmail.com

Received: 06-May-2023 / Manuscript No. TYOA-23-97963 / Editor assigned: 09-May-2023 / PreQC No. TYOA-23-97963 (PQ) / Reviewed: 24-May-2023 / QC No. TYOA-23-97963 / Revised: 01-Mar-2024 / Manuscript No. TYOA-23-97963 (R) / Published Date: 08-Mar-2024

Abstract

Background and objectives: Gasoline workers are constantly exposed to toxic gasoline vapors during their working hours. These vapors are cytotoxic that effect the hematological parameters and urine composition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the gasoline vapors on CBC and urine of gasoline workers with reference to the ages and different brands.

Materials and methods: We therefore divided our subjects into different age groups and collected data for comparative analysis of different brands. Complete blood counts were analyzed on automatic Celltac G MEK-9100 analyzer and urine was analyzed by using the color patch strip analysis (Roche).

Results: In our results WBC, EO, BA, PLT, PCT and MPV were highly significant increased in all age group. RBC counts, hemoglobin level and their indices, HCT, MCV and MCH were also significantly decreased. The significant variations were found among the RBC, HGB, MCV, MCH, PCT, MPV and NE across the age groups. Significant variations were also found in MCV and PCT in gasoline brands workers. In the urine, abnormalities were seen in specific gravity, pH values, nitrate, protein and bilirubin all age groups.

Conclusion: It is concluded that most blood and urinary parameters were affected by exposure to gasoline. Abnormalities in blood and urine parameters were more prominently assessed in higher age group (41-50 years).The environmental pollution due to gasoline vapors cause the serious health problems in blood which needs to be investigated further. Periodical medical examinations are recommended.

Keywords

Complete blood count; Urine composition; Gasoline vapors; Filling stations; Health impacts; Toxicity

Abbreviation

WBC: White Blood Cell, NE: Neutrophils, LY: Lymphocyte, MO: Monocytes, EO: Eosinophils, BA: Basophils, RBC: Red Blood Cell, HGB: Hemoglobin, HCT: Hematocrit, MCV: Mean Corpuscular Volume, MCH: Mean Corpuscular, MCHC: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration, RDW-CV: Red Blood Cell Distribution Width-Coefficient of Variation, RDW-SD: Red Blood Cell Width-Standard Deviation, PLT: Platelet, PCT: Plateletcrit, MPV: Mean Platelet Volume, PDW: Platelet count Distribution Width, P-LCR: Platelet Large Cell Ratio

Introduction

The term gasoline is used widely in the USA and the petrol is used in Britain and Pakistan. Gasoline contains substantial quantities of perilous and cancer causing chemicals like benzene, toluene, methylbenzene, xylene and numerous others [1]. Gasoline contains complex mixtures of toxic chemicals (i.e. more than 150 hydrocarbons). These hydrocarbons are comprised of about 50% to 70% of C4 to C12 straight chain alkanes (paraffin). Aromatic compounds (seriously carcinogenic) are also present in gasoline at 30% to 40% levels like benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene [2]. The standard specifications of different gasoline (European, Indian, and Pakistani) are shown in Table 1 [3].

Property aEuropean Parliament 2012/2017 b(Indian) 2010 cPakistani standard specification/(dand eanalytical quality)
Appearance Clear and bright Red (ULP) Pinkish/Pinkish
Density at 15°C, Kg/m3 720-775 745 0.76
Olefins max. ≤ 18 (% v/v) ≤ 10 (% v/v) ND
Aromatics max. ≤ 35 (% v/v) ≤ 35 (% v/v) ND/(42.77 wt%)
Benzene max. 1.0 (% v/v) 1.0 (% v/v) ND/(5.07 wt%)
Oxygen max. 2-3 (w/w%) 2.-5 (w/w%) ND
Sulphur max. 0.005 (wt/wt% ) 0.003 (wt/wt% ) ND
Lead content (mg/L) max. 5.0 (w/w%) 5.0 (w/w%) ND
ahttps://www.mabalive.co.uk/products/unleaded-petrol.
bhttps://www.transportpolicy.net/standard/india-fuels-diesel-and-gasoline.
cStandard test limits are produced from Pakistan standard 1430:1999(UDC:665.733.5) and ministry of petroleum and natural resources of Pakistan has directed “to report “ the specific gravity at 60/60 °F.
dAnalytical Studies on the quality and environmental impact of commercial moto gasoline available Multan region of Pakistan. Pak J Anal Envirn Chem. Vol.9, No.2 (2008).
eA Review of Transport and Urban Air Pollution in Pakistan. J Appl Sci Environ Manage. 2007;11(2):113-121.
ND: No. Data available

Table 1: Standard specification of European, Indian and Pakistani gasoline/petrol.

Pakistani gasoline consists of above mentioned chemicals (especially aromatic ones) at very high concentration and is unsuitable environmentally. PSO, SHELL and CALTEX brands of gasoline are used in Pakistan. CALTEX gasoline has 32.98 wt% concentration of aromatics, PSO has 43.19 wt% and SHELL has 42.35 wt%. European standards have 1% v/v limit for benzene in gasoline [4]. In Pakistan, the benzene concentration in PSO gasoline is 4.54 wt%, 5.44 wt% in SHELL and 5.25 wt% in CALTEX [5]. These concentrations of benzene in motor gasoline are very high which is alarming for the health of workers. The use of gasoline is increasing day by day. It can be a serious threat to workers as well as the general population of Pakistan in the future.

Gasoline vapors deteriorate Ambient Air Quality (AAQ) through the fugitive and exhaust emission. Oxygenates are mixed as octane improvers in petrol to decrease CO emission. In Pakistan no such preventive measures are taken by the ministry of petroleum, whereas in Europe 2-3 wt/wt% oxygenates are mixed in gasoline to protect the environment [6].

During the refueling at the service station, the saturated air with gasoline vapors is expelled out through the nozzle around the filling pipe and moved into the respiratory zone of working. These volatile hydrocarbons are readily inhaled by the workers and may cause a wide range of adverse health effects. Several factors such as exposure intensity and duration, chemical and molecular properties of the gasoline as well as inter individual differences (pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics variations) affect the health of workers.

Workers at filling station are at the highest risk of being exposed to toxic hydrocarbons and other gasoline constituents. Dealing with petrol fumes/vapors can have a variety of side effects on hematological investigations, renal function demolition, hepatic, central nervous systems and lung functions [7]. Platelets are blood cells in plasma that prevent bleeding by sticking together to form a clot. Clinically high platelets levels can lead to the certain condition including stroke, heart attack or clot in the blood vessel [8]. Plateletcrit (PCT) is a bioactive peptide and secreted by thyroid C cells. It is released into the blood that is an indicator of infection and inflammation in the clinic [9]. Elevation in Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) levels has been recognized as an independent factor for myocardial infarction in patients with coronary heart disease [10]. MPV has been found to be clinically useful in characteristic Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) from thrombocytopenia caused by underproduction of the platelets. Ntaios G and others observed that an increase in MPV was observed in Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) [11]. The high MPV also predicting poor prognosis in acute ischemia [12].

World Health Organization (WHO) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) declared that gasoline fumes contain toxic carcinogenic compounds which cause oxidative stress, dermatological problems, respiratory confusion, cytogenetic effects, structural changes in DNA, immune system deformity and also threats of leukemia, lymphoma and other types of cancer. The toxicity of gasoline constitutes is shown in Figure 1.

tyoa-Health

Figure 1: Health effects of toxic gasoline components.

In Pakistan, the majority of gasoline filling stations workers are not using any type of protective equipment’s to avoid exposure to the toxic gasoline vapors. Multan is a very densely populated city in Pakistan where the environmental influence is very worrying and alarming. There is a need of regular medical check-up of workers. The complete blood count and urinalysis is an essential diagnostic tool to investigate the deleterious effects of gasoline fumes on hematological and urinary damage in them.

Materials and Methods

Study subject: Total seventy five healthy male individual (nonsmoker) were included in the study from fifteen dynamic gasoline retail outlets (PSO, SHELL and CALTEX) in Multan whose working experience was (range 3 to 10 years) on the same brand of gasoline. Out of total, five samples were collected from each filling station. On the basis of their age, the subjects were divided into three groups: Group-I consisted of the age of 21-30 years, group-II 31-40 years and group-III 41-50 years. Each age group contains twenty five sampled [13].

Control subject: Healthy (non-smokers) individuals were selected as control subject that never worked at gasoline filling stations. Every individual was clinically examined (viral markers are screened by immune chromatographic test and biochemical parameters was examined by chemistry analyzer P500 Diatron). Age of control and grouping were same as the study subject.

Inclusion/exclusion criteria: The study was limited to only the gasoline retail outlet workers that were exposed to gasoline vapors at working hours. They also never used cigarettes, alcoholism, cocaine, and other abuse addictions. The attendants that worked in multiple brands were excluded.

Sample collection: The blood samples were taken (from July to August 2018) into k-2 EDTA vacutainers (5.4 mg, 3.0 ml, Becton Drive, Franklin Lakes, USA) and kept immediately at 8°C ± 2°C. Midstream urine samples (approximately 40 ml) were taken from every subject in sterilized sample cups [14]. The samples were transferred into the clinical laboratory of MINAR within one hour after collection. All blood and urine samples were collected in relaxed condition from the subjects in the all days.

Hematological analysis: Complete blood counts were analyzed on automatic Celltac G MEK-9100 (Nihon Kohden, Japan)after the quality control with standard reference material of different concentration (low, medium and high). White blood counts with differential neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils, red blood cell counts and hemoglobin level with their indices HCT, MCV, MCHC, RDW-CV, RDW-SD, and platelet counts with its indices PCT, MPV, PDW and P-LCR parameter were included in the study.

Urine composition analysis: Assessment of urine composition was performed by visual reading using the color patch strip analysis (Combur-10 Test, Roche Diagnostics, Germany) at room temperature for all the days of sampling collection. The test strip was dipped (about 3 second) into the urine sample and taken reading within 45 second. The developed reaction color was compared with the specific color labeled on the urinalysis box and taken reading (Analysis).

Statistical analysis: Data analysis was performed in IBM SPSSStatistics, version-24. P-value was calculated between the study group and the control by paired T-test after the verification of normal distribution by D’Agostino Pearson test. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to calculate the difference for those parameters that had a non-normal distribution. Fisher exact test was applied for nominal data of urine compositions. Mean percent change difference was calculated by the formula (mean % difference=(test value-reference value)/ reference value x 100) [15]. One way ANOVA was applied among the age-groups and brands. P<0.05 was considered significant results.

Results

The main results investigated from this study are presented in Table 2 and Figures 2-5. In hematological profiles; White Blood Cell counts (WBC) with differentials Eosinophil’s (EO) and Basophils (BA), the Platelet Counts (PLT) with its indices Plateletcrit (PCT) and Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) were significantly increased in three age groups (I, II and III).

Parameters (unit) Group-I (21-30 years) Group-II (31-40 years) Group-III (41-50 years)
Control Worker Mean % difference (p-value) Control Worker Mean % difference (p-value) Control Worker Mean % difference (p-value)
aWBC x (103/µL) 8.02 ± 1.30 9.06 ± 0.95 12.9 (0.02)* 7.96 ± 1.07 9.97 ± 2.15 25.2 (<0.01)** 7.39 ± 1.06 10.23 ± 2.09 38.4 (<0.01)**
aNE x (103/µL) 4.03 ± 1.18 4.46 ± 0.78 10.6 (0.25) 4.20 ± 0.66 5.48 ± 1.01 30.4 (<0.01)** 3.95 ± 0.90 4.93  ± 0.43 24.81 (0.06)
aLY x (103/µL) 3.49 ± 0.86 2.93 ± 0.56 -16.0 (0.02)* 2.95 ± 0.35 3.31 ± 0.90 12.2 (0.17) 2.65 ± 0.50 3.37 ± 0.65 27.16 (0.01)*
bEO x (103/µL) 0.29 ± 0.29 0.49 ± 0.33 68.9 (0.03)* 0.32 ± 0.21 0.72 ± 0.29 125.0 (<0.01)** 0.23 ± 0.08 0.75  ± 0.33 226.0(<0.01)**
aMO x (103/µL) 0.47 ± 0.12 0.43 ± 0.11 -8.5 (0.54) 0.56 ± 0.17 0.66 ±  0.63 39.3 (0.40) 0.50 ±  0.10 0.88  ±  0.79 76 (0.23)
bBA x (103/µL) 0.07 ± 0.03 0.10 ± 0.03 42.8 (0.03)* 0.07 ± 0.02 0.13 ±  0.10 85.7 (<0.01)** 0.06 ± 0.03 0.19  ± 0.12 216.6 (<0.01)**
aRBC x (106/µL) 5.67 ± 0.43 5.22 ± 0.40 -8.0 (0.01)* 5.56 ± 0.38 5.13 ± 0.49 -7.7 (<0.01)** 5.26 ± 0.47 4.71 ± 0.28 -10.4 (<0.01)**
aHGB (g/dl) 15.87 ± 1.38 14.80± 0.86 -6.7 (0.02)* 15.55 ± 0.95 14.44 ± 1.56 -7.1 (<0.01)** 14.87 ± 0.72 13.51 ± 1.10 -9.1 (<0.01)**
aHCT (%) 48.25 ± 2.63 44.33± 2.63 -8.1(<0.01)** 47.91 ± 4.02 42.68 ± 5.30 -10.9 (0.02)* 46.02 ± 0.62 40.11 ± 4.10 -12.9 (<0.01)**
bMCV (fL) 90.72 ± 2.86 87.85±3.14 -3.1 (0.04)* 88.76 ± 2.94 83.64 ± 6.22 -5.76 (<0.01)** 86.94 ± 4.41 78.14 ± 6.14 -9.3 (<0.01)**
aMCH (pg) 28.62 ± 1.28 27.39± 1.42 -4.3 (0.04)* 28.76 ± 0.57 26.48 ± 2.61 -7.4 (<0.01)** 28.68 ± 1.94 25.65 ± 3.32 -10.6 (<0.01)**
aMCHC (g/dl) 31.82 ± 1.09 32.64± 0.58 2.5 (0.05) 30.59 ± 2.25 28.00 ± 4.49 -9.0 (0.04)* 31.46 ± 0.87 30.86 ± 4.38 -1.9 (0.24)
aRDW-CV (%) 13.29 ± 0.77 13.14 ± 1.35 -1.1 (0.62) 13.96 ± 0.82 13.59 ± 2.24 2.65 (0.50) 13.92 ± 2.22 13.30 ± 2.20 -4.5 (0.28)
aRDW-SD (fL) 46.61 ± 2.94 46.20 ± 3.28 -0.8 (0.60) 47.92 ± 4.44 44.57 ± 3.75 -7.0 (0.07) 46.16 ± 4.72 44.25 ± 2.90 -4.1 (0.27)
aPLT x (103/µL) 254.55 ± 43.33 293.48 ± 31 15.2 (0.03)* 231.00 ± 25.43 288.50 ± 40.54 24.8 (<0.01)** 243.92 ± 25.75 314.43 ± 45.04 29.2 (<0.01)**
aPCT (%) 0.20 ± 0.04 0.25 ± 0.04 25.0 (<0.01)** 0.16± 0.03 0.23± 0.07  43.7 (<0.01)** 0.20 ± 0.03 0.29 ± 0.07 45.0 (<0.01)**
aMPV (fL) 7.47 ± 0.37 7.89  ± 0.54 5.6 (0.03)* 7.52± 0.80 8.35± 0.84 11.0 (<0.01)** 7.71 ± 0.84 8.71 ± 0.84 12.9 (<0.01)**
bPDW (%) 17.94 ± 0.96 17.63  ± 0.54 -1.7 (0.15) 17.76 ± 0.72 18.18 ± 0.68 2.36 (0.16) 17.67 ± 1.09 18.05 ± 0.61 -2.1 (0.19)
aP-LCR (%) 38.86 ± 5.11 41.04 ± 3.24 5.6 (0.14) 39.63 ± 6.77 43.57 ± 11.71 9.1 (0.19) 42.10 ± 9.46 43.62 ± 16.42 3.61 (0.76)
aNeutrophils-Lymphocyte ratio 1.26 ± 0.52 1.58 ± 0.46 25.3 (0.06) 1.44± 0.30 1.73± 0.43 19.4 (0.07) 1.53 ± 0.46 1.52 ± 0.33 -0.65 (0.92)
aPlatelet-Lymphocyte ratio 78.24 ± 26.47 106.45 ± 33.77 36.0 (0.01)* 75.47 ± 12.38 92.75 ± 25.52 22.8 (0.01) 103.46 ± 27.99 92.33 ± 13.21 -10.7 (0.22)
Urine
aSpecific gravity 1.01 ± 0.00 1.03 ±  0.00 1.6 (<0.01)** 1.01 ± 0.00 1.03 ± 0.04 1.4 (<0.01)** 1.01  ±  0.00 1.03   ±  0.00 1.6 (<0.01)**
bpH value 6.00  ± 0.00 5.30 ± 0.50 -11.7 (<0.01)** 6.00 ± 0.00 5.07 ± 0.27 -14.9 (<0.01)** 5.94  ± 0.02 5.05 3 ± 0.24 -14.9 (<0.01)**

Table 2: Results of all worker groups with control for blood counts and urine composition.

tyoa-white

Figure 2: Significant variation of white blood counts b/w healthy persons and gasoline workers.

tyoa-red

Figure 3: Significant variation of red blood counts b/w healthy persons and gasoline workers.

tyoa-levels

Figure 4: Significant variation of hemoglobin levels b/w healthy persons and gasoline workers.

tyoa-platelet

Figure 5: Significant variation of platelet counts b/w healthy persons and gasoline workers.

Red Blood Cell counts (RBC) and Hemoglobin (HGB) level with their indices Hematocrit (HCT) and Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH) was significantly decreased in three age groups (I, II and III). The Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) was also significantly increased in age group-I [16].

The significant variations were found among the RBC, HGB, MCV, MCH, PCT, MPV and NE across the age groups. Significant variations were also found in MCV and PCT in the three brands workers presented in Table 3.

Parameters (unit) Age group  Gasoline brands
Group-I (21-30 years) Group-II (31-40 years) Group-II (41-50 years) P-value PSO (workers) SHELL (workers) CALTAX (workers) P-value (workers)
WBC x (103/µL) 9.06 ± 0.95 9.97 ± 2.15 10.23 ± 2.09 0.21 10.77+2.02 10.26+2.25 9.84+2.06 0.58
NE x (103/µL) 4.46 ± 0.78 5.48 ± 1.01 4.93 ± 0.43 0.00** 5.53+1.43 5.64+1.07 4.7+1.02 0.13
LY x (103/µL) 2.93 ± 0.56 3.31 ± 0.90 3.37 ± 0.65 0.25 3.56+1.02 3.34+1.01 3.48+0.98 0.08
EO x (103/µL) 0.49 ± 0.33 0.72 ± 0.29 0.75 ± 0.33 0.07 0.53+0.29 0.72+0.30 0.75+0.37 0.21
MO x (103/µL) 0.43 ± 0.11 0.66 ± 0.63 0.88 ± 0.79 0.16 0.74+0.71 0.77+0.70 0.77+0.75 0.91
 BA x (103/µL) 0.10 ± 0.03 0.13 ± 0.10 0.19 ± 0.12 0.06 0.15+0.12 0.15+0.11 0.15+0.12 0.98
RBC x (106/µL) 5.22 ± 0.40 5.13 ± 0.49 4.71 ± 0.28 0.00** 5.06+0.69 5.10+0.40 4.84+0.52 0.44
HGB (g/dl) 14.80 ± 0.86 14.44 ± 1.56 13.51 ± 1.10 0.03* 14.64+2.05 14.56+1.45 13.68+1.21 0.23
HCT (%) 44.33 ± 2.63 42.68 ± 5.30 40.11 ± 4.10 0.15 44.5+7.7 42.6+6.1 39.83+5.12 0.28
MCV (fL) 87.85 ± 3.14 83.64 ± 6.22 78.14 ± 6.14 0.00** 86.85_6.0 83.03+7.33 79.87+5.87 0.04*
MCH (pg) 27.39 ± 1.42 26.48 ± 2.61 25.65 ± 3.32 0.33 27.22_2.38 26.91+2.95 25.78+4.38 0.51
MCHC (g/dl) 32.64 ± 0.58 28.00 ± 4.49 30.86 ± 4.38 0.00** 30.13+2.20 28.56+0.22 30.14+4.72 0.38
RDW-CV (%) 13.14 ± 1.35 13.59 ± 2.24 13.30 ± 2.20 0.75 13.66+1.4 13.90+2.53 13.30+0.81 0.21
RDW-SD (fL) 46.20 ± 3.28 44.57 ± 3.75 44.25 ± 2.90 0.29 46.82+3.42 45.15+3.7 43.44+3.39 0.08
PLT x (103/µL) 293.48 ± 31.0 288.50 ± 40.54 314.43 ± 45.04 0.23 291.80+35.35 279.41+40.97 305.54+35.57 0.27
PCT (%) 0.25 ± 0.04 0.23 ± 0.07 0.29 ± 0.07 0.02* 0.23+0.02 0.23+0.03 0.27+0.08 0.03*
MPV (fL) 7.89 ± 0.54 8.35 ± 0.84 8.71 ± 0.84 0.01* 8.34+0.51 8.51+0.63 8.73+0.71 0.71
PDW (%) 17.63 ± 0.54 18.18 ± 0.68 18.05 ± 0.61 0.06 17.76+0.51 18.14+0.62 18.31+0.69 0.12
P-LCR (%) 41.04 ± 3.24 43.57 ± 11.71 43.62 ± 16.42 0.8 40.80+11.19 43.95+13.37 40.21+12.32 0.73
Urine
Specific gravity 1.03 ± 0.00 1.03 ± 0.04 1.03 ± 0.00 0.06 1.02+0.004 1.028+0.003 1.02+0.002 0.32
pH 5.30 ± 0.50 5.07 ± 0.27 5.053 ± 0.24 0.8 5.15 ± 0.37 5.00 ± 0.02 5.05 ± 0.00 0.34

Table 3: Comparison of blood and urine parameters across the age groups and the brands of gasoline

In the result of the urine composition, significant variation was observed in specific gravity, pH values, nitrate, protein, ketone, Urobilinogen (UGB) and bilirubin presented in Table 4.

Group Nitrate Protein Ketone UGB Bilirubin
Group I (21-30 years)
  N P N P N P N P N P
Control 24 1 25 0 25 0 25 0 24 1
Study 4 21 13 12 14 11 7 18 3 22
P Value <0.01** <0.01** <0.01** <0.01** <0.01**
Group II (31-40 years)
  N P N P N P N P N P
Control 25 0 25 0 25 0 23 2 25 0
Study 3 22 7 18 12 13 10 15 2 23
P Value <0.01** <0.01** <0.01** <0.01** <0.01**
Group III (41-50 years)
  N P N P N P N P N P
Control 23 2 25 0 25 0 25 0 25 0
Study 5 20 5 20 16 9 4 21 4 21
P Value <0.01** <0.01** <0.01** <0.01** <0.01**

Table 4: Comprehensive results of nominal parameters for urine composition.

Discussion

Every day of human life, the uses of gasoline are increasing commercially, and its vapors are recognized toxic for human health [17]. Experimental studies in animals have proved evidence of cancer exposed to vapors of gasoline in various organs and tissues.

Different gasoline vapors affect the hematopoietic system and result in altered hematological parameters. Significant increase in the white blood cell counts, Eosinophils (EO) and Basophils (BA) were analyzed by Avogbe, et al., Christian, et al., D’Andrea and Reddy, et al., Dede, et al., with exposure of gasoline vapors in different duration. White blood cells take part a most significant function in phagocytosis, immunity and therefore in protection against infection. The high level in white blood cells means the body is sending more and more cells to fight off infections. Elevation of these may also observe in patients with different type of cancer leukemia and lymphomas.

Eosinophils and basophils can become increased in patients with allergic disorders asthma, certain parasitic and dermatology disorders. Eosinophils play a significant role in the inflammation related to allergic, eczema and asthma. The elevation in the blood above the normal range (more than 500 eosinophils per μl) is considered eosinophilia disease. The scores of EO more than three times of normal range may cause hypereosinophila [18].

Our findings of RBC and HGB are similar to Okro, et al., he investigated the exposure of gasoline fumes cause bone marrow hyperplasia. Concluded by some other studies are supported to our investigation in the significant reduction of RBC counts and HGB level with their indices.

The HGB level is low from normal levels is called anemia. In anemia patients, measurements of MCV allows to classify either a microcytic anemia (MCV below normal range), normocytic anemia (MCV within normal range), or macrocytice anemia (MCV above normal range). The hemoglobin levels and Hematocrit (HCT) is more than the normal range in patients with critically dehydrated lower than normal range in patients is fluid overloaded. Low quantity of iron in the blood can cause low MCH level. The lower scores of MCH also affect the skin (pale/bruise). The high value (MCH) may be the result of liver disease and an overactive thyroid gland.

The finding of the present study showed that Platelet (PLT) counts with indices PCT and MPV were observed significantly raising in all study group of gasoline workers compare to control group. This study is consistence with the pervious study which indicated that mean WBC and platelet counts were significantly increased in benzene exposed (non-smoker) attendants worked at gasoline filling stations.

The study was executed by al Jothery et al., concluded that Platelet (PLT) counts were significantly raised whereas Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) was significantly decreased in non-smoking gasoline workers.

In result of urine parameters presented in Table 4, the variation of nitrate, protein, urobilinogen, ketone and bilirubin in urine were significantly observed. However, abnormalities in these variations were highly significant in higher age group. Analysis of nitrate is done routinely to the diagnosis of bacterial cystitis. The positive nitrate shows in Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) due to the occurrence of bacteria [19]. The presence of bilirubin in urine composition can occur to buildup jaundice before clinical indication and is an early sign of liver disease. The possibility of the liver disease may be occurred in gasoline workers due to toxic vapors exposure. Urobilinogen (UGB) normally appears in the low fraction in urine. The positive results of Urobilinogen (UGB) assist to identify liver disease like hepatitis, cirrhosis and such situation related to increasing the Red Blood Cell counts (RBC) demolition in hemolytic anemia. The presence in bilirubin and UGB in urine marks to possible red blood cell fracture due oxidative stress particularly prolonging the duration of exposure to gasoline vapors [20].

In spite of that, the findings of this study revealed that exposure to gasoline fumes is associated with significant health concerns, which causes the abnormalities in hematological parameters, and alter the urine composition and also disturbed other body organ functions. Therefore it is important for workers who are exposed to gasoline fumes need to monitor frequent periodic checkups and laboratory blood functions to detect further long-term toxicities to the bone marrow, kidney and other organs. Further studies are needed to determine its long-term health effects in affected workers.

Conclusion

In conclusion abnormalities were found in blood picture and urine composition of attendants working at gasoline filling stations. The seriously affected blood parameterswere: White Blood Cell counts (WBC), Eosinophils (EO), Basophils (BA), Red Blood Cell counts (RBC), Hemoglobin level (HGB), Hematocrit (HCT), Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH), Platelet counts (PLT), Plateletcrit (PCT), Mean Platelet Volume (MPV). These parameters show the sensitive indicators in the early hematological changes among the workers exposed to gasoline vapors. Significant variations also found in specific gravity, PH values, nitrate, protein, urobilinogen, ketone and bilirubin. The abnormalities were elevated in higher age group (41-50 years) comparatively to other both groups. Our investigation shows the possibility of anemia and bone marrow depression dropping in the RBC, HBG and HCT. Positive nitrate in the urine composition also indicates immune depressing effects. Further studies are essential to investigate the hematotoxicity of gasoline vapors.

Ethical Clearance

The study was conducted by the approval (ref. No.M-3(13)/2018) of the institutional ethical committee of MINAR, Nishtar hospital Multan. The Institution’s ethical board administrated and monitored the whole work of the study carefully.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge with thanking to enlighten the real research guidance of Dr. Khan Muhammad Sajid, Chief Scientist, MINAR, Pakistan.

Recommendations

• It is suggested that workers must be protected from exposure to vapors by training with the equipment, wearing protective devices to avoid the possibility of any abnormalities and clinical check may be done on a regular basis.
• There is a serious need to check the standard quality and specification of gasoline at public distribution points. It is also suggested that Pakistan Standards and Control Authority (PSQCA) may collect randomly sampling the gasoline and check analytically specification especially carcinogenic chemical from retail outlets and Pakistani Environment Protection Agency (EPA) may check the ambient air quality at the gasoline stations.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

No funding was provided directly or indirectly from any supportive organization for the present work.

References

Citation: Hussain S, Mehmood R, Iqbal F, Yousaf S (2024) Effect of Gasoline Fumes on Blood and Urine Parameters of Attendants (non-smokers) among Different Age-Groups and Brands (PSO, SHELL and CALTEX) of Gasoline Filling station in Multan, Pakistan. Toxicol Open Access 10: 259.

Copyright: © 2024 Hussain S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

https://sekillinickyazma.com.tr/

Top