Early Detection of Semantic Memory Changes May Help Predict the Course of Alzheimer's Disease

¹Department of Psychology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan

²Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

³Department of Psychology, College of Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

*Corresponding Author:

MauSun Hua
Department of Psychology
College of Science, National Taiwan University
No.1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road
Taipei 106, Taiwan
Tel: +886 2 33663101
E-mail: huams@ntu.edu.tw

Received date: May 26, 2017; Accepted date: June 02, 2017; Published date: June 09, 2017

Citation: Chang HT, Chiu MJ, Hua MS (2017) Early Detection of Semantic Memory Changes May Help Predict the Course of Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis Parkinsonism 7:333. doi:10.4172/2161-0460.1000333

Copyright: © 2017 Chang HT, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Alzheimers Disease & Parkinsonism

Over the course of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), patients suffer from relentless progressive dementia. Characterization of at-risk stages of AD is crucial for targeted prevention of dementia [1]. Neuropathological evidence suggests that earliest AD affects declarative memory [2- 4], which can be further categorized as either episodic memory or semantic memory [5,6]. Episodic memory deals with specific events of the past, whereas semantic memory deals with general knowledge of the world [6,7]. The earliest neuropathological changes in patients with AD may correlate more strongly with semantic memory than episodic memory [2,8,9]. Therefore, detecting early changes in the semantic memory of AD patients may be clinically important. Semantic memory impairment has been well-documented among patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) [10-19] and among patients with prodromal stage of DAT (amnestic mild cognitive impairment, aMCI) [20-29]. Semantic memory deficits may occur early in the disease course of AD and therefore comprise useful markers of disease progression. However, the predictive value of semantic memory impairment remains controversial [20,22,27,29]. The previously observed inconsistencies may be attributable to distinct processes of semantic memory retrieval [10,30]. Many complex mental operations associated with semantic memory retrieval can be performed with minimal attentional capacity by dint of extensive practice. These types of mental operations are considered ‘automatic’. Conversely, other tasks that involve semantic memory retrieval require considerable attentional capacity to perform and are commonly referred to as ‘effortful’. AD patients display disproportionally poor performance on semantic tasks that require the effortful retrieval of semantic memories, whereas automatic retrieval tends to be better preserved [10]. Chang et al. [31]. Compared effortful and automatic retrieval of semantic memory among individuals with aMCI [32], DAT or subjective memory impairment (SMI) [1]. In this study, patients with DAT and aMCI-multiple domain (aMCI-md) [32] displayed poor performance on all semantic memory tasks. Conversely, patients with aMCI-single domain (aMCI-sd) [32] were found to have performed more poorly on a semantic memory task that required a relatively high degree of effortful retrieval. In addition, the risk of conversion from MCI to DAT (approximately 27 months after the first evaluation) among aMCI-sd patients who displayed poor performance on semantic memory tasks requiring effortful retrieval exceeded the risk faced by aMCI-sd patients who performed normally on the same tasks by more than two-fold in this study (50% vs. 23%). In contrast, aMCI-md patients who presented poor semantic memory in tasks that required automatic retrieval were at higher risk of conversion to DAT (58% vs. 38%). Nonetheless, the sensitivity of performance on the semantic memory task requiring high degree of effortful retrieval in predicting conversion from aMCI to DAT was relatively low compared to specificity in this study. Recent studies have suggested that combining performance on semantic memory tasks with biomarkers of AD may facilitate the prediction [22,28,33]. In addition, novel neurophysiological markers have been proposed by researchers to detect early neuropathological changes in AD and other cognitive disorders (e.g. increased excitability of motor cortex in transcranial magnetic stimulation studies [34-38]). The relatively low sensitivity of semantic memory performance in predicting DAT conversion among aMCI patients in Chang et al. [31] may be due to that the study did not incorporate the biomarkers of AD in the prediction. Moreover, combining other tasks requiring effortful semantic memory retrieval may also improve the sensitivity in predicting DAT conversion among aMCI patients [39-41].

Overall, neuropathological evidence has revealed that the deterioration of semantic memory generally occurs earlier than the deterioration of episodic memory in the disease course of AD. The controlled processes involved in semantic memory retrieval may provide cognitive markers for the characterization and prediction of neuropathological changes among patients in the prodromal stage AD. We suggest that future researchers perform a large-scale longitudinal study incorporating biomarkers to address various aspects of semantic memory retrieval that characterize the early disease stages of AD (e.g. SMI). Such a study should help to more fully elucidate the value of semantic memory in predicting the conversion of MCI to DAT.

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan (NSC 102-2410-H-002-051-MY3). The authors have no disclosures to report.

References

1. Jessen F, Amariglio RE, van Boxtel M, Breteler M, Ceccaldi M, et al. (2014) A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 10: 844-852.
2. Braak H, Braak E (1991) Neuropathological staging of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol 82: 239-259.
3. Squire LR (1992) Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys and humans. Psychol Rev 99: 195-231.
4. Henke K (2010) A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nat Rev Neurosci 11: 523-532.
5. Squire LR, Alvarez P (1995) Retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation: A neurobiological perspective. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5: 169-177.
6. Tulving E (2001) Episodic memory and common sense: How far apart? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356: 1505-1515.
7. Tulving E (1983) Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
8. Mayes A, Montaldi D, Migo E (2007) Associative memory and the medial temporal lobes. Trends Cogn Sci 11: 126-135.
9. Didic M, Barbeau EJ, Felician O, Tramoni E, Guedj E, et al. (2011) Which memory system is impaired first in Alzheimer's disease? J Alzheimers Dis 27: 11-22.
10. Arroyo-Anlló EM, Bellouard S, Ingrand P, Gil R (2011) Effects of automatic/controlled access processes on semantic memory in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 25: 525-533.
11. Chertkow H, Bub D (1990) Semantic memory loss in dementia of Alzheimer's type. What do various measures measure? Brain 113: 397-417.
12. Grossman M, Koenig P, Glosser G, DeVita C, Moore P, et al. (2003) Neural basis for semantic memory difficulty in Alzheimer's disease: An fMRI study. Brain 126: 292-311.
13. Grossman M, Peelle JE, Smith EE, McMillan CT, Cook P, et al. (2013) Category-specific semantic memory: Converging evidence from bold fMRI and Alzheimer's disease. NeuroImage 68: 263-274.
14. Henry JD, Crawford JR, Phillips LH (2004) Verbal fluency performance in dementia of the Alzheimer's type: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 42: 1212-1222.
15. Hodges JR, Patterson K (1995) Is semantic memory consistently impaired early in the course of Alzheimer's disease? Neuroanatomical and diagnostic implications. Neuropsychologia 33: 441-459.
16. Hodges JR, Salmon DP, Butters N (1992) Semantic memory impairment in Alzheimer's disease: Failure of access or degraded knowledge? Neuropsychologia 30: 301-314.
17. Saykin AJ, Flashman LA, Frutiger SA, Johnson SC, Mamourian AC, et al. (1999) Neuroanatomic substrates of semantic memory impairment in Alzheimer's disease: Patterns of functional MRI activation. J Int Neuropsych Soc 5: 377-392.
18. Vita MG, Marra C, Spinelli P, Caprara A, Scaricamazza E, et al. (2014) Typicality of words produced on a semantic fluency task in amnesic mild cognitive impairment: Linguistic analysis and risk of conversion to dementia. J Alzhermers Dis 42: 1171-1178.
19. Wakefield SJ, McGeown WJ, Shanks MF, Venneri A (2014) Differentiating normal from pathological brain ageing using standard neuropsychological tests. Curr Alzheimer Res 11: 765-772.
20. Barbeau EJ, Didic M, Joubert S, Guedj E, Koric L, et al. (2012) Extent and neural basis of semantic memory impairment in mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis 28: 823-837.
21. Duong A, Whitehead V, Hanratty K, Chertkow H (2006) The nature of lexico-semantic processing deficits in mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia 44: 1928-1935.
22. Gainotti G, Quaranta D, Vita G, Marra C (2014) Neuropsychological predictors of conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. J Alzhermers Dis 38: 481-495.
23. Gardini S, Cuetos F, Fasano F, Pellegrini FF, Marchi M, et al. (2013) Brain structural substrates of semantic memory decline in mild cognitive impairment. Curr Alzheimer Res 10: 373-389.
24. Hodges JR, ErzinÃÂ?§lioÃÂ?Ÿlu S, Patterson K (2006) Evolution of cognitive deficits and conversion to dementia in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a very-long-term follow-up study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 21: 380-391.
25. Joubert S, Brambati SM, Ansado J, Barbeau EJ, Felician O, et al. (2010) The cognitive and neural expression of semantic memory impairment in mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia 48: 978-988.
26. Molinuevo JL, Gómez-Anson B, Monte GC, Bosch B, Sánchez-Valle R, et al. (2011) Neuropsychological profile of prodromal Alzheimer's disease (Prd-AD) and their radiological correlates. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 52: 190-196.
27. Quaranta D, Vita MG, Spinelli P, Scaricamazza E, Castelli D, et al. (2014) Does semantic memory impairment in amnestic MCI with hippocampal atrophy conform to a distinctive pattern of progression? Curr Alzheimer Res 11: 399-407.
28. Venneri A, Gorgoglione G, Toraci C, Nocetti L, Panzetti P, et al. (2011) Combining neuropsychological and structural neuroimaging indicators of conversion to Alzheimer's disease in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Curr Alzheimer Res 8: 789-797.
29. McLaughlin PM, Wright MJ, Larocca M, Nguyen PT, Teng E, et al. (2014) The "Alzheimer's type" profile of semantic clustering in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 20: 402-412.
30. Pouliot S, Gagnon S (2005) Is egocentric space automatically encoded? Acta Psychol (Amst) 118: 193-210.
31. Chang HT, Chiu MJ, Chen TF, Cheng TW, Hua MS (2015) Distinct patterns and clinical implications of semantic memory deterioration among patients with MCI. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Dis 29: 124-134.
32. Petersen RC (2004) Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med 256: 183-194.
33. Dong A, Toledo JB, Honnorat N, Doshi J, Varol E, et al. (2017) Heterogeneity of neuroanatomical patterns in prodromal Alzheimer's disease: Links to cognition, progression and biomarkers. Brain 140: 735-747.
34. Pennisi G, Ferri R, Lanza G, Cantone M, Pennisi M, et al. (2011) Transcranial magnetic stimulation in AlzheimerâÂ?Â?s disease: A neurophysiological marker of cortical hyperexcitability. J Neural Transm 118: 587-598.
35. Lanza G, Bramanti P, Cantone M, Pennisi M, Pennisi G, et al. (2017) Vascular cognitive impairment through the looking glass of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Behav Neurol 2017: 1421326.
36. Bella R, Ferri R, Cantone M, Pennisi M, Lanza G, et al. (2011) Motor cortex excitability in vascular depression. Int J Psychophysiol 82: 248-253.
37. Bella R, Ferri R, Lanza G, Cantone M, Pennisi M, et al. (2013) TMS follow-up study in patients with vascular cognitive impairment-no dementia. Neurosci Lett 534: 155-159.
38. Concerto C, Lanza G, Cantone M, Pennisi M, Giordano D, et al. (2013) Different patterns of cortical excitability in major depression and vascular depression: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. BMC Psychiatry 13: 300.
39. Marra C, Gainotti G, Fadda L, Perri R, Lacidogna G, et al. (2016) Usefulness of an integrated analysis of different memory tasks to predict the progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease: The episodic memory score (EMS). J Alzheimers Dis 50: 61-70.
40. Saling MM (2009) Verbal memory in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: beyond material specificity. Brain 132: 570-582.
41. Chang JS, Chi YK, Han JW, Kim TH, Youn JC, et al. (2013) Altered categorization of semantic knowledge in Korean patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 36: 41-48.