Advances in Crop Science and Technology
Open Access

Digital farming; Agri food; Crops

Introduction

In the past few years, digital farming has emerged as a revolutionary concept, transforming conventional agricultural practices. In simple terms, digital farming is the use of modern technologies such as sensors, drones, and algorithms to develop a data-driven approach towards farming. To understand the impact of digital farming, we need to take a closer look at the challenges faced by traditional farming practices [1]. Agri-food systems are under enormous pressure to feed the world’s growing population while ensuring food security, sustainability, and profitability. At the same time, climate change is causing extreme weather events, reducing crop yields, and threatening the livelihoods of millions of farmers. Traditional farming practices are simply not equipped to deal with these challenges. Many farmers still rely on trial-and-error approaches to farming, using pesticides and fertilizers excessively and damaging soil quality in the process. Traditional methods are not only unsustainable but also pose serious environmental and health risks for humans and animals [2-5]. This is where digital farming comes in. By using technologies like sensors, drones, and algorithms, farmers can collect, analyze and use data to make more informed decisions regarding crop management, soil health, and climate conditions. Digital farming enables farmers to monitor specific crop and soil conditions in real-time, which makes it possible to intervene proactively and prevent crop damage [6,7].

For example, sensors can measure soil moisture, nutrient levels, and temperature, and send data to cloud-based systems. Farmers can then use this information to make real-time decisions about irrigation, fertilizer application, and crop protection measures, reducing waste and increasing yields.

Drones can be used for a range of agricultural activities, including crop monitoring, mapping, plant counting, and spraying. With sensors and cameras, drones can capture highly accurate aerial images of crops, enabling farmers to detect problems such as nutrient deficiencies, water stress, and pest infestations. They can also be used to deliver targeted sprays and fertilizers, reducing the need for chemicals and minimizing environmental pollution. Digital farming also enables farmers to take a proactive approach to climate change adaptation. By monitoring climate patterns and soil conditions, farmers can adjust planting dates, irrigation, and nutrient inputs to minimize the impact of extreme weather events. This not only increases the resilience of crops but also helps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Perhaps the most significant benefit of digital farming is that it enables farmers to operate more efficiently and sustainably. By using data to make decisions, farmers can reduce waste, save resources, and improve profitability. This is especially important for smallholder farmers who are often the most vulnerable to climate change and market forces [8-10]. With digital farming, smallholder farmers can access the same tools and technologies as large-scale agribusinesses, which can help to level the playing field. Digital farming also has the potential to transform the relationship between consumers and farmers. By tracking the origin, quality, and sustainability of crops, farmers can provide consumers with more transparency and traceability in the food supply chain. This has implications not only for food safety but also for ethical concerns such as fair trade and animal welfare.

Despite its potential benefits, there are some challenges to the adoption of digital farming. Many small-scale farmers lack the resources and technical knowledge to implement digital farming practices. There is also a need for more affordable and accessible technologies that can be adapted to local conditions and languages.

Conclusion

Digital farming is still a relatively new concept, and there is much to learn about how it can be used most effectively. However, there is no doubt that digital farming has the potential to transform agriculture and contribute to sustainable food systems. By using data to make decisions, farmers can produce more food with fewer resources, reduce waste and environmental impacts, and improve profitability. Digital farming can also help to create more transparent and sustainable food supply chains, benefiting both farmers and consumers.

As the world faces increasing challenges related to climate change, food security, and sustainability, digital farming is emerging as a crucial tool for transforming agricultural practices and creating a more sustainable future.

1. Anders C, Bargsten K, Jinek M (2016) Structural plasticity of PAM recognition by engineered variants of the RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Mol Cell 61(6): 895-902.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Bao A, Burritt DJ, Chen H, Zhou X, Cao D, et al. (2019) The CRISPR/Cas9 system and its applications in crop genome editing. Crit Rev Biotechnol 39(3): 321-336.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Barcaccia G, Albertini E (2013) Apomixis in plant reproduction: a novel perspective on an old dilemma. Plant Reproduction 26: 159-179.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Hatzios KK, Penner D (1985) Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. RevWeed Sci 1: 1-63.

     Google Scholar

5. Jianhua Zhang, Allan S Hamill, Susan E (2017) Antagonism and Synergism between Herbicides: Trends from Previous Studies. Herbs J A 2: 56-96.

     Google Scholar

6. Mennan H, D Isik (2003) Invasive weed species in onion production systems during the           last 25 years in Amasya, Turkey. Pak J Bot 35 (2): 155 - 160.

       Google Scholar

7. Firehun Yirefu, Yohannes Zekarias , Leul Mengistu (2009) Weed competition in the sugarcane plantations of Ethiopia: Influence of variety and duration of competition. Ethio Sugar Develop Agency Res Directorate Wonji 26: 65-96.

     Google Scholar          

8. Green JM (1991) Maximizing herbicide  efficiency with  mixtures  and  expert  systems.  Weed Sci Society of Am 2: 23-30.

      Google Scholar    

9. Green JM (1989)Herbicide antagonism at the whole plant level. Weed Technol 3: 217-226.

        Google Scholar    

10. Grichar WJ, Boswell TE (1987) Herbicide combinations in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol 1: 290-293.

     Google Scholar