Industrial Chemistry
Open Access

Creation of a Preliminary Inherent Safety Evaluation Tool for Chemical Process Design

Introduction

Chemical processes play a pivotal role in various industries, from pharmaceuticals to petrochemicals, facilitating the production of essential goods. However, these processes inherently carry risks, including potential hazards such as fires, explosions, and toxic releases. Recognizing and addressing these hazards early in the design phase is critical to minimizing risks and ensuring the safety of both workers and the surrounding environment [1]. Inherent safety is a concept that emphasizes the design of processes to minimize or eliminate hazards rather than relying solely on protective measures. Unlike traditional safety approaches that focus on adding layers of protection, inherent safety seeks to design out hazards from the outset [2,3]. Developing tools to assess inherent safety at the early stages of process design is essential for integrating safety considerations seamlessly into the design process. Chemical processes are integral to numerous industries, ranging from pharmaceuticals to manufacturing, providing the foundation for the production of essential goods and materials. However, these processes inherently harbor various risks, including potential hazards such as fires, explosions, and toxic releases. Ensuring the safety and integrity of chemical processes is paramount to protect both personnel and the environment [4,5]. In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on inherent safety – a proactive approach that aims to design out hazards from processes rather than relying solely on mitigative measures [6]. Unlike traditional safety strategies that primarily focus on adding layers of protection, inherent safety seeks to eliminate or minimize hazards at the source, thereby reducing the likelihood of accidents and their potential consequences. While the concept of inherent safety is well-established within the realm of process safety, its practical implementation during the early stages of chemical process design remains a challenge. Designing inherently safer processes requires a systematic approach to identify and evaluate potential hazards, as well as the integration of safety considerations into the design process from its inception [7,8]. To address this challenge, researchers and practitioners have recognized the need for a preliminary inherent safety evaluation tool tailored specifically for the early stages of chemical process design. This tool aims to provide engineers and designers with a systematic framework for assessing inherent safety factors, identifying potential hazards, and exploring opportunities for hazard reduction or elimination right from the outset of the design process [9,10].

Significance of inherent safety

The importance of inherent safety in chemical process design cannot be overstated. By prioritizing the elimination or reduction of hazards at the source, inherent safety offers several advantages over traditional safety measures. These include:

Prevention of accidents: Inherent safety reduces the likelihood of accidents by design, minimizing the reliance on additional safety systems that may fail or be bypassed.

Cost-effectiveness: Addressing safety considerations early in the design phase is more cost-effective than retrofitting safety measures later in the process.

Environmental protection: Inherent safety not only protects personnel but also reduces the risk of environmental pollution by preventing or minimizing releases of hazardous substances.

Sustainability: By minimizing resource use and waste generation, inherent safety aligns with sustainability principles, contributing to the overall environmental footprint of chemical processes.

Development of a preliminary evaluation tool

To address these challenges, researchers and practitioners have embarked on the development of a preliminary inherent safety evaluation tool specifically tailored for early-stage chemical process design. This tool aims to provide a systematic framework for assessing inherent safety factors and identifying opportunities for hazard reduction or elimination.

Key features of this evaluation tool include

Simplified methodology: The tool incorporates simplified models and heuristics to streamline the evaluation process, making it accessible to a wide range of users, including those with limited technical expertise.

Risk screening criteria: By focusing on key inherent safety indicators such as toxicity, reactivity, and flammability, the tool enables rapid screening of potential hazards early in the design phase.

Decision support system: The tool includes a decision support system that guides users through the evaluation process, helping them prioritize mitigation strategies and design modifications to enhance inherent safety.

Integration with design software: Integration with existing process design software enhances the tool's usability and allows for seamless incorporation of safety considerations into the design workflow.

Conclusion

The development of a preliminary inherent safety evaluation tool represents a significant step forward in advancing chemical process safety. By providing a systematic framework for assessing inherent safety at the early stages of design, this tool empowers engineers and designers to integrate safety considerations seamlessly into the design process. Moving forward, ongoing research and collaboration will be essential to refine and validate the tool, ensuring its effectiveness in enhancing the safety and sustainability of chemical processes worldwide. the development of a preliminary inherent safety evaluation tool represents a significant advancement in the field of chemical process safety. By providing engineers and designers with a systematic framework for assessing inherent safety factors during the early stages of process design, this tool offers a proactive approach to hazard identification and risk mitigation. The integration of inherent safety considerations into the design process from its inception holds the potential to yield substantial benefits, including improved safety performance, reduced risks of accidents and incidents, and enhanced sustainability. Furthermore, by enabling engineers to identify and address potential hazards early on, the tool facilitates more informed decision-making and design optimization, ultimately leading to more robust and cost-effective process designs.

Discussion

The development of a preliminary inherent safety evaluation tool for chemical process design marks a significant step forward in enhancing process safety and sustainability. In this discussion, we delve deeper into the implications, challenges, and future directions of this innovative tool. One of the primary implications of the preliminary inherent safety evaluation tool is its potential to shift the paradigm of process safety from reactive to proactive. Traditional approaches to process safety often focus on mitigating risks after they have been identified, leading to the reliance on protective measures such as alarms, relief systems, and containment structures. In contrast, inherent safety emphasizes the design of processes to eliminate or minimize hazards from the outset. By providing engineers with a systematic framework to assess inherent safety factors during the early stages of design, the evaluation tool enables them to identify and address potential hazards before they become entrenched in the process.

References

1. Douros A, Renoux C, Yin H, Filion KB, Suissa S et al. ( 2017) Concomitant use of direct oral anticoagulants with antiplatelet agents and the risk of major bleeding in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation Am J Med 132 : 191-199.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Bargnoux AS, Piéroni L, Cristol JP (2013) Analytical study of a new turbidimetric assay for urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin determination. Clin Chem Lab Med 51: 293-296.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Westhoff JH, Tönshoff B, Waldherr S (2015) Urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 predicts adverse outcome in pediatric acute kidney injury. Plos One 10: 143-628.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Gillespie IMM, Philip JC (2013)Bioremediation an environmental remediation technology for the bioeconomy.Trends Biotechnol31: 329-332.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Anand S, Mande SS (2018)Diet, Microbiota and gut-lung connection. Front Microbiol 9: 21-47.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Barolo MI, Ruiz Mostacero N, caricaL (2014) An ancient source of food and health.Food Chem 164: 119–127.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Ala-Korpela M. (2019) The culprit is the carrier, not the loads: cholesterol, triglycerides and Apo lipoprotein B in atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease. Int J Epidemiol 48: 1389-1392.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Esper RJ, Nordaby RA (2019) cardiovascular events, diabetes and guidelines: the virtue of simplicity. Cardiovasc Diabetol 18: 42.

Indexed at, Google   Scholar, Crossref

9. Lorentzen HF, Benfield T, Stisen S, Rahbek C (2020) COVID-19 is possibly a consequence of the anthropogenic biodiversity crisis and climate changes.Dan Med J67: 20-25.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

10. Abrahamsson TR, Jakobsson HE, Andersson AF, Bjorksten B, Engstrand L et al. (2014)Low gut Microbiota diversity in early infancy precedes asthma at school age. Clin Exp Allergy 44: 842-850.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref