Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production
Open Access

COVID-19 impact; Small-scale fisheries; Aquatic food supply chains; Market disruption; Livelihoods; Food security.

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has unleashed unprecedented disruptions across various sectors, profoundly affecting global food systems and local economies [1]. Among the most impacted are small-scale fisheries, which play a crucial role in providing food security and livelihoods, particularly in coastal and rural communities [2]. These fisheries, characterized by their reliance on traditional practices and informal markets, have faced significant challenges as a result of the pandemic's widespread economic and social upheavals. Small-scale fisheries are integral to the aquatic food supply chain, supplying a substantial portion of the world's fish consumption and supporting millions of people worldwide. However, the pandemic has strained these systems through a combination of market closures, restricted mobility, and shifts in consumer demand [3].

The closure of international and local markets, disruptions in supply chains, and constraints on transportation have led to reduced income opportunities and increased post-harvest losses. These challenges have been exacerbated by pre-existing vulnerabilities in the sector, such as limited access to financial resources and inadequate infrastructure.

This introduction aims to set the stage for an exploration of the various impacts of COVID-19 on small-scale fisheries and the broader aquatic food supply chains. By examining the specific ways in which the pandemic has affected these areas, this study seeks to highlight the immediate and long-term consequences for fishers, consumers, and policy-makers. Understanding these impacts is essential for developing effective strategies to support and strengthen small-scale fisheries, ensuring their resilience and sustainability in the face of future crises [4].

Discussion

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected small-scale fisheries and aquatic food supply chains, revealing both vulnerabilities and areas of resilience within these critical sectors. This discussion synthesizes the key findings regarding the pandemic’s impact, exploring the multifaceted challenges faced by small-scale fisheries and their broader implications for aquatic food systems [5]. One of the most immediate effects of the pandemic on small-scale fisheries was the disruption of supply chains. The closure of international and local markets, along with restrictions on transportation and trade, severely impacted the ability of small-scale fishers to sell their catch. Market closures led to an oversupply of fish, driving down prices and increasing post-harvest losses. Many fishers, especially those in developing countries, faced significant financial strain due to reduced income and the inability to access global markets. The economic repercussions of the pandemic have been particularly harsh for communities dependent on small-scale fisheries. The loss of income has exacerbated existing socioeconomic challenges, including poverty and food insecurity [6].

Small-scale fishers often lack financial safety nets and social protections, making them highly vulnerable to economic shocks. The decline in earnings has affected not only the fishers but also associated communities, including vendors, processors, and distributors, further straining local economies. In response to the disruptions, small-scale fisheries have demonstrated remarkable adaptability [7]. Many communities have implemented innovative strategies to cope with the crisis, such as diversifying income sources, exploring new markets, and adjusting fishing practices. Some fishers have shifted to direct sales through digital platforms, while others have engaged in community-supported fisheries models to strengthen local supply chains. These adaptive responses highlight the resilience of small-scale fisheries and their capacity to innovate under pressure. The pandemic has underscored the need for robust support systems for small-scale fisheries. There is a pressing need for policies that enhance the resilience of these fisheries, such as improving access to financial resources, investing in infrastructure, and developing contingency plans for future crises. Strengthening social safety nets and providing targeted support can help mitigate the impacts of economic shocks and ensure the sustainability of small-scale fisheries [8].

Additionally, building more resilient supply chains and diversifying market opportunities can help reduce vulnerability to future disruptions [9]. The experience of the COVID-19 pandemic offers valuable lessons for the future of small-scale fisheries and aquatic food systems. Emphasizing resilience and adaptability in policy and practice can help better prepare for and respond to future crises. Investments in research, technology, and infrastructure are essential to support the recovery and sustainability of small-scale fisheries. Collaborative efforts between governments, NGOs, and the private sector can foster more resilient and equitable food systems, ensuring that small-scale fisheries continue to play a vital role in global food security and community well-being. , the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted both the vulnerabilities and the resilience of small-scale fisheries and aquatic food supply chains. Understanding these impacts and implementing strategic interventions can help support the recovery and long-term sustainability of these critical sectors [10].

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the critical role that small-scale fisheries play in global food systems and the significant challenges they face during crises. The disruptions to supply chains, market access, and livelihoods have highlighted the vulnerabilities of small-scale fisheries, revealing how deeply interconnected these sectors are with broader economic and social systems. The immediate impacts of the pandemic market closures, reduced income, and increased post-harvest losses have had severe consequences for fishers and their communities. The economic strain has exacerbated existing issues such as poverty and food insecurity, demonstrating the need for more robust support systems and safety nets.

References

1. CSA (2022) Agricultural Sample Survey, Volume II report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings). Central Statistical Agency (CSA): Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Google Scholar

2. FAO (2010) Chicken genetic resources used in smallholder production systems and opportunities for their development. FAO Smallholder Poultry Production Paper NO. 5.

Google Scholar    

3. Solomon D (2007) Suitability of hay box brooding technology to the rural household poultry production system. Inter J Res Sust Develop World Agri CIPAV, Cali, Colombia.

Google Scholar

4. Biazen A, Mengistu U, Negassi A, Getenet A, Solomon A, et al. (2019b) FAO Poultry Sector Ethiopia, Animal Production and Health Livestock Country Reviews. No. 11. Rome.

Google Scholar

5. Shapiro BI, Gebru G, Desta S, Negassa A, Nigussie K, et al. (2015) Ethiopia livestock master plan. ILRI Project Report. Inter Live Res Inst (ILRI).

Google Scholar

6. CSA (2020) Agricultural Sample Survey Volume II report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings). Central Statistical Agency (CSA): Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Google Scholar

7. Kumsa B, Beyecha K, Geloye M (2008) Ectoparasites of sheep in three agro-ecological zones in central Oromia, Ethiopia. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 79: 1-7.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Fitsum M, Aliy M (2014) Poultry Production System and Role of Poultry Production in Tigray Region, Northern Ethiopia: A Review. J Biol Agri Healthc 4: 27.

Google Scholar

9. Solomon D (2007) Suitability of hay box brooding technology to the rural household poultry production system. Inter J Res Sust Develop World Agri CIPAV, Cali, Colombia.

Google Scholar

10. CSA (2022) Agricultural Sample Survey, Volume II report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings). Central Statistical Agency (CSA): Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Google Scholar