Clinical Research on Foot & Ankle
Open Access

Ankle sprains; Musculoskeletal injuries; Accurate diagnosis; Ligamentous damage; Chronic phases of injury

Introduction

Ankle sprains represent one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries encountered in both athletic and non-athletic populations worldwide. Whether incurred during a sporting activity, a slip on uneven terrain, or simply a misstep, ankle sprains can lead to significant pain, swelling, and functional limitations. However, with appropriate management, individuals can typically regain full function and return to their normal activities. This introduction provides an overview of the comprehensive management approaches for ankle sprains, spanning from the acute injury phase through rehabilitation and injury prevention strategies [1,2].

Description

Ankle sprains commonly occur as a result of excessive inversion or "rolling" of the foot, leading to stretching or tearing of the ligaments on the outer aspect of the ankle [3]. The severity of an ankle sprain can vary widely, ranging from mild stretching of ligaments to complete tears, with corresponding implications for treatment and recovery. Moreover, recurrent ankle sprains can predispose individuals to chronic ankle instability, further emphasizing the importance of comprehensive management strategies [4].

The initial management of ankle sprains focuses on accurate diagnosis and timely intervention to mitigate pain and swelling, promote healing, and prevent long-term complications. Clinical evaluation, including a detailed history and physical examination, is crucial for assessing the severity of the injury and ruling out associated fractures or ligamentous tears. Diagnostic imaging, such as X-rays and occasionally Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), may be utilized to further delineate the extent of injury and guide treatment decisions [5,6]. In the acute phase, the implementation of the RICE protocol (Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation) is standard practice to reduce inflammation and facilitate tissue healing. Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) may also be prescribed for pain management. Additionally, the use of ankle braces, splints, or taping techniques may provide external support and stability during the healing process, allowing for early mobilization while minimizing the risk of re-injury [7,8].

As individuals progress beyond the acute phase, rehabilitation plays a pivotal role in restoring ankle strength, range of motion, proprioception, and neuromuscular control. Rehabilitation programs are tailored to the individual's specific needs and may include a combination of therapeutic exercises, manual therapy techniques,and functional activities aimed at improving overall ankle function and reducing the risk of recurrence [9]. Furthermore, emphasis is placed on injury prevention strategies to mitigate the risk of future ankle sprains. This includes education on proper footwear selection, modification of training techniques, and participation in structured neuromuscular training programs aimed at improving ankle stability and biomechanics [10,11].

Conclusion

In summary, the management of ankle sprains requires a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach encompassing accurate diagnosis, acute injury management, rehabilitation, and injury prevention strategies. By implementing evidence-based practices and fostering collaboration among healthcare professionals, individuals affected by ankle sprains can achieve optimal outcomes and safely return to their desired level of activity.

1. Ogilvie Harris DJ, Reed SC, Hedman TP (1994). Disruption of the ankle syndesmosis: biomechanical study of the ligamentous restraints. Arthroscopy 10: 558-560.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

2. Edwards GS Jr, DeLee JC (1984). Ankle diastasis without fracture. Foot Ankle 4:305-312.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

3. Pankovich AM (1976). Maisonneuve fracture of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg 58: 337-342.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

4. Beumer A, van Hemert WL, Niesing R (2004). Radiographic measurement of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis has limited use. Clin Orthop 423: 227-234.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

5. Jenkinson RJ, Sanders DW, Macleod MD, Domonkos A, Lydestadt J (2005). Intraoperative diagnosis of syndesmosis injuries in external rotation ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 19: 604-609.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

6. Sinisaari IP, Lüthje PM, Mikkonen RH (2002). Ruptured tibio-fibular syndesmosis: comparison study of metallic to bioabsorbable fixation. Foot Ankle Int 23: 744-748.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

7. Marqueen T, Owen J, Nicandri G, Wayne J, Carr J (2005). Comparison of the syndesmotic staple to the transsyndesmotic screw: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int 26: 224-230.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

8. Böstman OM (1998). Osteoarthritis of the ankle after foreign-body reaction to absorbable pins and screws: a three- to nine-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 80: 333-338.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

9. Kaukonen JP, Lamberg T, Korkala O, Pajarinen J (2005). Fixation of syndesmotic ruptures in 38 patients with a malleolar fracture: a randomized study comparing a metallic and a bioabsorbable screw. J Orthop Trauma 19: 392-395.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

10. Bragonzoni L, Russo A, Girolami M (2006). The distal tibiofibular syndesmosis during passive foot flexion: RSA-based study on intact, ligament injured and screw fixedcadaver specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:304-308.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar