ISSN: 2155-6199

Journal of Bioremediation & Biodegradation
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Comparison of Biological Aerobic and Anaerobic Carbon, Sulfur and Nitrogen Removal

Saima Fazal1,2, Shaobin Huang1,2*, Hao Xu1,2, Yongqing Zhang1,2, Waseem Hayat1,2, Xiaodong Du1,2, Fazal Raziq3, Liang Qiao3 and Zahid Ullah4
1School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Science and Technology, Guanzhou, P.R. China
2Guangdong Ecological Environment Control Engineering Technology Research Center, China
3School of Physics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China
4Department of Environmental Sciences, Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan
*Corresponding Author: Shaobin Huang, School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Science and Technology, Guanzhou, P.R. China, Tel: +86-20-39380587, Email: chshuang@scut.edu.cn

Received: 22-May-2018 / Accepted Date: 30-May-2018 / Published Date: 31-May-2018 DOI: 10.4172/2155-6199.1000443

Retraction Note

The article entitled “Comparison of Biological Aerobic and Anaerobic Carbon, Sulfur and Nitrogen Removal” has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Bioremediation & Biodegradation considering the statements provided in the article as personal opinion of the author which was found not having any conflict or biasness towards anything. As the article was a perspective one, information provided by the author was considered as an opinion to be expressed through publication.

Publisher took decision to make the article online solely based on the reviewers suggestion which considered the article not but a personal opinion of the author. However, it is found that the author have some personal concerns and issues, therefore, being retracted from the journal

Top