Journal of Analytical & Bioanalytical Techniques
Open Access

Collision-induced dissociation; CID; Glycan analysis; Glycoprotein analysis; Carbohydrate fragmentation; Mass spectrometry; Structural elucidation; Glycomics; Glycoproteomics

Introduction

Glycans and glycoproteins are integral to numerous biological functions, including cell-cell communication, immune response, protein folding, and signal transduction. These complex carbohydrates are involved in a wide array of physiological processes and diseases, making them critical targets for research in molecular biology and biochemistry. Understanding their structure is vital for uncovering their roles in cellular and molecular functions. However, their structural complexity, diverse linkages, and heterogeneity make them challenging to analyze, requiring sophisticated analytical techniques to decode their architecture [1].

One of the most powerful methods for analyzing glycans and glycoproteins is mass spectrometry (MS), which offers high sensitivity and specificity. In particular, Collision-Induced Dissociation (CID) has emerged as a key tool for the fragmentation and structural analysis of glycans and glycoproteins. CID allows researchers to break down large, intact molecules into smaller ions, facilitating the identification of the individual sugar residues, glycosidic linkages, and other modifications [2].

Description

Collision-Induced Dissociation (CID) is a widely used technique in tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) for the fragmentation of ions. It involves the collision of an ionized molecule with a neutral gas (often nitrogen or argon), which imparts energy to the ion, causing it to fragment into smaller ions. These fragment ions are then analyzed in a second mass spectrometer, providing structural information about the original molecule. CID is particularly valuable for the analysis of biomolecules such as proteins, peptides, and carbohydrates, including glycans and glycoproteins.

The process of CID begins when a precursor ion, typically selected by the first stage of the mass spectrometer, is accelerated into a collision cell. In the collision cell, the precursor ion collides with neutral gas molecules, transferring energy to the ion. This energy causes the molecular bond to break, resulting in the formation of fragment ions. These fragments are then analyzed in the second mass spectrometer, where the m/z (mass-to-charge ratio) of each fragment is recorded. The key advantage of CID is its ability to produce predictable fragmentation patterns that can be used to deduce structural information about the original molecule. The nature of the fragmentation is influenced by the chemical structure of the ion, which allows researchers to infer the sequence of sugar residues, the type of glycosidic linkages, and the presence of modifications such as sulfation, phosphorylation, or acetylation [4-7].

Glycans are complex carbohydrates that consist of a variety of sugar residues linked together by glycosidic bonds. These sugar chains are often attached to proteins, forming glycoproteins, which play essential roles in numerous biological processes. The analysis of glycans and glycoproteins is challenging due to the diversity of sugar structures, the variety of possible linkages, and the presence of modifications. CID offers a powerful means of studying these structures by providing detailed fragmentation information.

The structural complexity of glycans, which often contain multiple branching points, varying sugar residues, and different types of glycosidic linkages, presents significant challenges for their characterization. CID helps to break down the glycan into smaller fragments, allowing the identification of individual monosaccharide units and the analysis of their glycosidic linkages. By analyzing the fragmentation patterns, researchers can determine the sequence of sugar residues and the branching structure of the glycan.

For example, CID can distinguish between different types of glycosidic bonds, such as α- or β-linkages, which are crucial for understanding the function and interactions of the glycan. Fragment ions generated by CID can also reveal modifications, such as sulfation or acetylation, which are common in glycan structures and contribute to their functional diversity. Glycoproteins, which are proteins with covalently attached glycans, are involved in a wide range of cellular processes, including cell signaling, immune response, and protein folding. The analysis of glycoproteins presents additional challenges, as it involves not only the characterization of the glycan moiety but also the protein backbone. CID plays a critical role in this analysis by enabling the fragmentation of both the glycan and the peptide backbone [8].

In glycoprotein analysis, CID can provide detailed information about the glycan structure, including the composition of sugar residues, the type of glycosidic linkages, and the presence of modifications. It can also provide insights into the location of the glycan attachment site on the protein, which is important for understanding the functional implications of glycosylation. Additionally, CID can help to identify glycoforms of glycoproteins, which are variants of a glycoprotein with different glycan structures attached.

The interpretation of CID data is essential for deriving meaningful structural information from fragmentation patterns. In glycan and glycoprotein analysis, CID data can be used to identify the monosaccharide units in a glycan and determine the glycosidic linkages between them. The fragmentation patterns of glycans typically produce characteristic ions that reflect the position of the glycosidic bonds and the identity of the sugar residues [9].

For example, CID of a glycan may produce ions corresponding to the loss of specific sugar units or the cleavage of glycosidic bonds. By analyzing the m/z ratios of these fragments, researchers can deduce the sequence of sugar residues and the branching structure of the glycan. Similarly, in glycoprotein analysis, CID can provide information about both the glycan and the peptide backbone, enabling researchers to identify glycosylation sites and determine the structure of the glycoprotein. To aid in data interpretation, various software tools have been developed that help researchers visualize and analyze CID fragmentation patterns. These tools can automatically match fragment ions with known structures, significantly speeding up the analysis process [10].

Discussion

The ability of CID to produce detailed fragmentation patterns has made it an essential tool in the study of glycans and glycoproteins. This technique has numerous applications in the fields of glycomics and glycoproteomics, particularly in the following areas.

CID is widely used in glycomics to profile glycans in biological samples. Researchers can use CID to identify the glycan structures present in complex mixtures, such as serum or tissue samples. This is crucial for understanding the roles of glycans in health and disease, as changes in glycosylation patterns are often associated with various conditions, including cancer, autoimmune diseases, and infectious diseases.

While CID is a powerful tool for glycan and glycoprotein analysis, it also presents several challenges. One of the main difficulties in CID is the complexity of carbohydrate structures. Glycans often exhibit a high degree of heterogeneity, with variations in sugar composition, branching patterns, and linkages. This can make it challenging to interpret CID data accurately, as the fragmentation patterns can be complex and overlapping.

Conclusion

Collision-Induced Dissociation (CID) is a powerful and essential technique for the structural analysis of glycans and glycoproteins. By providing detailed fragmentation information, CID enables researchers to decode the complex structures of carbohydrates and their protein conjugates, offering insights into their roles in biological processes and disease mechanisms.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Hoffmann S, de Vries R, Stephens ML, Beck NB, Dirven HA, et al.  (2017) A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology. Arch Toxicol 91:2551-2575.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Cole R (2019) Toxicology in the super resolution era. Curr Protoc Toxicol 80:e77.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Maurer HH (2010) Analytical  toxicology. Molecular Clinical and Environmental Toxicology 317-338.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Liu S, Yin N, Faiola F (2017) Prospects and frontiers of stem cell toxicology. Stem Cells Dev 26:1528-1539.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Satoh T (2016) History of japanese society of toxicology. J Toxicol Sci 41:SP1-SP9.

                Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Skoog DA, Holler FJ, Crouch SR (2017) Principles of instrumental analysis 6th ed. Delhi Cengage learning  806-835.

Google Scholar

7. (2005) Validation of analytical procedures: Text and Methodology Q2 (R1). ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline 4-13.

Google Scholar

8. Lambert S, Valiulis Q (2018) Cheng Advances in optical sensing and bioanalysis enabled by 3D printing. ACS Sens 3: 2475-2491.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Kim E, Kim J, Choi I, Lee J, Yeo WS, et al. (2020) Organic matrix-free imaging mass spectrometry. BMB reports 53:349.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Wang Y, Han Y, Hu W, Fu D, Wang G (2020) Analytical strategies for chemical characterization of bio‐oil. Journal of separation science 43:360-371.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref