Journal of Community & Public Health Nursing
Open Access

It has been apparent for quite some time that places and communities have multiple and various impacts on individual- position and community- position health issues. Research in a Canadian population shows that people who dislike aspects of their neighbourhood's physical terrain are 1.5 times more likely to report habitual health conditions [1], while those who like their neighbourhood's physical environment are less likely to report fair/poor health. Neighbourhood terrain is also associated with being fat and obese. Further, perceived social cohesion in a community is linked with better health and good. In community health, addressing neighbourhood aspects(e.g., quality of casing, access to amenities, safety and social cohesion) in addition to further conventional determinants of health(e.g., low income, life behaviour) is of adding significance to original health policy [2].

Especially in depressed neighbourhoods, there's growing interest among experimenters and policymakers to understand the part of place and community in reducing health inequalities. Research suggests that citizen perceptions of their neighbourhood and housing problems may intervene the health goods of neighbourhood deprivation [3]. Thus, perfecting community health requires close collaboration with citizens, communities and social healthcare providers as well as other stakeholders, for illustration, casing associations, transport services, wellbeing enterprise. The Alma Ata protestation of the World Health Organisation endorses the significance of sectors other than the health sector [4], similar as the ‘social sector’, to attain the ‘highest possible position’ of health. The WHO also describes the significance of the involvement of the public in their health as ‘the right and duty to share collectively and inclusively in the planning and perpetration in their health care.

The involvement of citizens in perfecting community health can do in numerous different gradations. Citizen science is an illustration of citizen participation in which citizens or local residers are laboriously involved as exploration partners in scientific exploration [5]. Citizen science uses the collaborative strength of communities to identify exploration questions, collect and analyse data, interpret results, make new discoveries and develop technologies and operations. Citizen wisdom engages citizens to address and answer to complex environmental and societal issues and has the capability to generate large amounts of data. Likewise, citizen science is an important tool for standardizing science and stimulating equitable and universal access to scientific data and information.

Methods

Setting and participants

The study was conducted in four low socioeconomic neighbourhoods in Maastricht, the Netherlands between June 2018 and April 2019. The four targeted neighbourhoods were also the setting of an integrated community approach (ICA) aimed at perfecting population health. In the ICA health and social care providers, the municipality, the primary health insurer, the Provincial State, professionals and citizens unite together since December 2016 to ameliorate the health of the community [6]. One of the main rudiments of the ICA is active involvement of the citizens living in the four neighbourhoods and thus a citizen science approach was initiated. The citizens in the four neighbourhoods face health challenges and socioeconomic problems which impact their health status, similar as low self- perceived health[7], poverty, life problems (e.g., fat) and a feeling of misfortune of control over their claim lives. The neighbourhoods are characterised by a advanced number of non-western emigrants (range 15 in Wyckerpoort to 21 in Limmel, compared to 11 in Maastricht). In spite of the fact that the neighborhoods share the same challenges, they also have a few special highlights. The neighbourhood Limmel has a relatively large pupil population (15 – 25 times old) compared to the rest of the Maastricht region (33vs. 19). Wyckerpoort has a fairly high number of single homes compared to the rest of Maastricht (39vs. 29).

Eligible participants in this citizen science project were citizens progressed 18 times and aged from the four neighbourhoods who were suitable to communicate in Dutch and were motivated to ameliorate the health of their neighbourhoods. We signed citizens through being networks in the community (e.g., community health workers, wellknown active citizens) and by using snowball sampling [8]. Flyers with information about the design were displayed at four community centres and the two primary care centres. Also, one of the experimenters (SG) joined a being information request on running community enterprise in order to inform citizens in the communities about the design.

Community health in the neighbourhood The citizen scientists together interviewed 49 people and conducted 50 compliances in the neighbourhoods. All interviewees were 18 times or aged and lived in one of the four deprived neighbourhoods of Maastricht.

Forty themes surfaced from the interviews and observations. Two citizen scientists took prints of linked themes during the interviews to illustrate their data (i.e., structure trace lair, healthy casing). One of the citizen researchers as it were made perceptions [9]. Some of the citizen scientists saw this design as a good reason to talk to community members who, in their opinions, lived as a isolate in the community. The 40 themes were categorised into the six disciplines of Positive Health during data analysis. all themes categorised in one of the six disciplines and divided into ‘ health barrier ’ and ‘ health enabler ’. In the following paragraphs, the most mentioned themes are developed.

Discussion

In this paper, we inspected how citizen science can contribute to picking up knowledge into community wellbeing and to the wellbeing of the citizen researchers themselves. To answer our first question, it appeared that the citizen scientists collected precious data on community health in their neighbourhoods [10]. The results show that the citizen scientists were impeccably suitable to identify core issues in the depressed neighbourhoods since utmost particulars which were set up are also described in the being literature as health determinants in depressed neighbourhoods. For illustration, ‘not feeling secure’ was a prevailing thing which was display in all four neighborhoods.

Conclusion

There are a growing number of citizen science projects around the globe; still, citizen science in the field of community health is fairly new. Our design has shown that citizen wisdom can contribute to gaining insight into community health and contribute to the individual health perception of the citizen scientists themselves by empowering them as activeco-researchers rather of passive exploration objects. Still, further exploration needs to be done with similar locations and groups to produce a large and useful dataset to increase knowledge on this content.

1. Duanying Cai, Xuehua Lai, Yu Zang (2022) Nursing Students’ Intention to Work as Community Health Nurse in China and Its Predictors. Jou com healt n 39: 170-177.
   

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
   

2. Aazam H, Maryam Rassouli, Simin Jahani, Nasrin Elahi, Shahram M(2022) Scope of Iranian community health nurses ‘services from the viewpoint of the managers and nurses: a content analysis study. BMC Nursing 21: 1.
   

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
   

3. Xiuxiu Shi, Ying Zhou, Zheng Li (2021) Bibliometric analysis of the Doctor of Nursing Practice dissertations in the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. J Adv Nurs 3: 776-786.
   

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
   

4. Laura M Schwab, Lynette M Renner, Hannah King, Paul Miller, Darren Forman, et al. (2021) “They’re very passionate about making sure that women stay healthy”: a qualitative examination of women’s experiences participating in a community paramedicine program. BMC 21:1167.
   

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
   

5. Tuba B, İrem Nur O, Abdullah B, İlknur Y, Hasibe K(2021) Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Scale on Community Care Perceptions (Scope) for Nursing Students. Clin Exp Health Sci 12: 162 – 168.
   

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
   

6. Gittelsohn J, Evans M, Story M, Davis SM, Metcalfe L, et al. (1999) Multi-site Formative Research to Prevent Obesity in American Indian School Children. Am J Clin Nutr AM 69: 767–772.
   

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
   

7. Gittelsohn J, Steckler A, Johnson CC, Pratt C, Grieser M, et al. (2006) Formative research in school and community-based health programs and studies: “State of the Art” and the TAAG approach. Health Education & Behavior, 33: 25–39.
   

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
   

8. Gittelsohn J, Roache C, Kratzmann M, Reid R, Ogina J, et al. (2010) Participatory research for chronic disease prevention in Inuit communities. Am J Health Behav 34: 453-464.
   

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
   

9. Gittelsohn J, Jock B, Redmond L, Fleischhacker S, Eckmann T, et al. (2017) OPREVENT2: Design of a multi-institutional intervention for obesity prevention and control for American Indian adults. BMC Public Health 17: 105.
   

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
   

10. Jernigan V, Salvatore A, Styne DM, Winkleby M (2012) Addressing food insecurity in a Native American reservation using community-based participatory research. Health Educ Res 27: 645–655.
    

    Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref