Journal of Analytical & Bioanalytical Techniques
Open Access

Chromatography; Environmental monitoring; Pollutants; Toxic compounds; Gas chromatography; Liquid chromatography; Environmental analysis; Persistent organic pollutants; Analytical techniques

Introduction

Environmental pollution is a global concern that has widespread implications for human health, ecosystems, and biodiversity. Industrialization, urbanization, agricultural practices, and the improper disposal of chemicals have led to the accumulation of hazardous substances in air, water, and soil. Among the many techniques used to detect and quantify these pollutants, chromatography has emerged as one of the most effective and versatile methods. Chromatographic techniques provide precise and reliable means of analyzing complex environmental samples, identifying pollutants at trace levels, and ensuring compliance with environmental regulations [1].

This article delves into the role of chromatography in environmental monitoring, with a particular focus on its ability to detect pollutants and toxic compounds. We will examine the different types of chromatography employed in environmental analysis, their applications, benefits, and challenges, and discuss future trends in the field [2].

Description

Chromatography is a technique that separates components of a mixture based on their different interactions with a stationary phase and a mobile phase. Several types of chromatography are used in environmental monitoring, each suited to specific analytical needs [3].

Gas chromatography is one of the most commonly used chromatographic techniques for analyzing volatile and semi-volatile compounds, such as hydrocarbons, pesticides, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In GC, the sample is vaporized and carried through a column by an inert gas, typically helium or nitrogen. The stationary phase, usually a liquid or solid, interacts with the sample components, causing them to separate based on their chemical properties. The separated components are then detected by a detector such as a flame ionization detector (FID) or mass spectrometer (MS). GC is especially useful for analyzing pollutants in air and water, including pollutants such as benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX), as well as other VOCs that are of environmental concern due to their toxicity and persistence in the atmosphere [4].

Liquid chromatography is primarily used for the analysis of compounds that are not volatile or semi-volatile, such as pesticides, herbicides, and pharmaceuticals. In LC, the sample is dissolved in a liquid mobile phase, which is then passed through a column packed with a stationary phase. The interactions between the stationary phase and the components of the sample result in their separation. Detection methods in LC can include ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometry, fluorescence detection, or mass spectrometry. LC is widely used for detecting contaminants in water, soil, and sediments, particularly for polar compounds that do not easily vaporize under GC conditions [5].

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is a more advanced version of LC, characterized by higher resolution, faster analysis, and greater sensitivity. HPLC uses high-pressure pumps to force the mobile phase through the column, allowing for better separation and faster run times. This technique is particularly useful for complex environmental samples, such as those containing a mixture of toxic organic compounds, heavy metals, and emerging pollutants. HPLC is commonly used for analyzing persistent organic pollutants (POPs), including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dioxins, which are resistant to environmental degradation and can accumulate in the food chain [6].

Two-dimensional chromatography, including two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) and two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC), involves performing two successive separations on the same sample. This approach enhances the resolution of complex mixtures, enabling the detection of a wider range of pollutants. Hyphenating chromatography with techniques such as mass spectrometry (MS) or Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy further enhances the sensitivity and specificity of environmental analysis. Chromatography is used extensively to monitor pollutants and toxic compounds in various environmental compartments. Some of the most common applications include [7].

Chromatographic techniques are essential for analyzing water quality, particularly in the detection of pesticides, herbicides, heavy metals, VOCs, and pharmaceuticals. Water sources, including drinking water, rivers, lakes, and groundwater, may be contaminated by industrial runoff, agricultural runoff, or wastewater discharge. Chromatography helps identify pollutants at low concentrations, ensuring that water quality meets safety standards. For example, pesticide residues in water can be effectively detected using HPLC or GC, helping to assess the impact of agricultural practices on water resources [8].

Soil and sediment are crucial matrices for detecting pollutants that have accumulated due to industrial, agricultural, or domestic activities. Chromatography is particularly useful for identifying persistent organic pollutants (POPs) such as PCBs, dioxins, and flame retardants in soil and sediment samples. These compounds can remain in the environment for long periods, posing long-term risks to human and environmental health. Using GC and HPLC, environmental scientists can detect trace levels of such pollutants and assess the extent of contamination in soil and sediments.

Chromatography plays a key role in air quality monitoring by detecting VOCs and other gaseous pollutants. Airborne contaminants, such as carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and particulate matter (PM), are harmful to human health and the environment. GC is commonly used for the detection of VOCs, which contribute to smog formation and have adverse effects on respiratory health. For example, GC can measure VOCs such as formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and xylene, which are emitted from industrial processes, vehicle exhaust, and the use of solvents [9].

Although chromatography is not directly used to detect heavy metals, it can be coupled with techniques like inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) or atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) to analyze metal contamination in environmental samples. By coupling chromatography with ICP-MS or AAS, scientists can achieve simultaneous separation and quantification of both organic and inorganic pollutants in environmental matrices.

Environmental samples are often complex, containing a wide variety of substances that can interfere with the chromatographic separation process. Matrices such as soil, water, and air may contain particulate matter, organic matter, and other contaminants that can affect the accuracy and precision of results. Pre-treatment steps, such as filtration, extraction, and concentration, are often required to prepare samples for analysis [10].

Environmental pollutants are often present at trace levels, requiring highly sensitive chromatographic techniques. Achieving the necessary sensitivity can be challenging, particularly for compounds that are difficult to isolate or that have low volatility. Advances in detector technology, such as mass spectrometry, have helped overcome some of these challenges, but they come with higher costs and more complex instrumentation.

Environmental monitoring is subject to stringent regulatory standards, and chromatographic methods must meet the required accuracy and precision to ensure compliance with regulations. Developing standardized methods for specific pollutants across different environmental matrices is critical for consistent and reliable results.

Discussion

Chromatography continues to evolve as a vital tool in environmental monitoring, particularly in detecting and quantifying pollutants and toxic compounds in diverse environmental media. The advent of advanced chromatographic techniques, including high-resolution methods and hyphenated techniques, has greatly enhanced the sensitivity, selectivity, and speed of analyses. These innovations have enabled more accurate and efficient monitoring of environmental contamination, helping to address the growing concerns of environmental pollution.

The combination of chromatography with complementary techniques like mass spectrometry (MS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and infrared spectroscopy has significantly advanced the detection capabilities for complex environmental samples. These developments are especially useful in identifying emerging pollutants that were previously difficult to detect using traditional methods. Despite these advancements, there remain challenges related to sample complexity, low concentrations of pollutants, and the need for highly specialized instrumentation. However, the integration of new technologies and continuous improvements in chromatographic methods are expected to overcome these limitations in the future.

Conclusion

Chromatography remains a cornerstone of environmental monitoring, providing essential data for understanding pollution trends, assessing environmental health, and formulating effective policies. By offering accurate, reliable, and precise analyses of pollutants and toxic compounds, chromatography enables the detection of a wide range of environmental contaminants, from VOCs and heavy metals to persistent organic pollutants. Although challenges remain, advances in chromatographic techniques, such as hyphenation with mass spectrometry and two-dimensional chromatography, are driving the future of environmental monitoring. As environmental concerns continue to escalate globally, the role of chromatography in ensuring cleaner, safer environments will only become more crucial. Future research into developing more sensitive, cost-effective, and rapid chromatographic techniques

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Hoffmann S, de Vries R, Stephens ML, Beck NB, Dirven HA, et al.  (2017) A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology. Arch Toxicol 91:2551-2575.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Cole R (2019) Toxicology in the super resolution era. Curr Protoc Toxicol 80:e77.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Maurer HH (2010) Analytical  toxicology. Molecular Clinical and Environmental Toxicology 317-338.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Liu S, Yin N, Faiola F (2017) Prospects and frontiers of stem cell toxicology. Stem Cells Dev 26:1528-1539.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Satoh T (2016) History of japanese society of toxicology. J Toxicol Sci 41:SP1-SP9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Bongiorno D, Di Stefano V, Indelicato S, Avellone G, Ceraulo L, et al. (2021)Bio‐phenols determination in olive oils: Recent mass spectrometry approaches. Mass Spectrometry Reviews: 21744.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Wang S, Blair IA, Mesaros C (2019) Analytical methods for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics studies. Advancements of Mass Spectrometry in Biomedical Research: 635-647.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Jang KS, Kim YH (2018) Rapid and robust MALDI-TOF MS techniques for microbial identification: a brief overview of their diverse applications. Journal of Microbiology 56:209-216.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Shoghi E (2013) SolubilitypH profiles of some acidic, basic and amphoteric drugs. Eur J Pharm Sci 48: 291300.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Voelgyi G (2010) Study of pH-dependent solubility of organic bases Revisit of Henderson-Hasselbalch relationship. Anal Chim Acta 673: 406.

Indexed at, Google Scholar