Journal of Materials Science and Nanomaterials
Open Access

Nanomaterials, Characterization, SEM, TEM, AFM

Introduction

Nanomaterials, defined as materials with at least one dimension in the range of 1 to 100 nanometers, have gained immense attention due to their unique properties and potential applications across various fields, including medicine, electronics, and materials science [1,2]. These properties often differ significantly from those of bulk materials, necessitating precise characterization techniques to fully understand and utilize them. Traditional analytical methods, while useful, may not always be adequate due to the small size and high surface-to-volume ratio of nanomaterials [3,4]. Therefore, a variety of advanced characterization techniques have been developed to address these challenges and provide detailed information about the structural, chemical, and physical properties of nanomaterials [5,6].

Discussion

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

TEM is one of the most powerful techniques for imaging and analyzing the structure of nanomaterials at atomic resolution [7]. It provides detailed information about the size, shape, and morphology of nanoparticles. Recent advancements in high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) allow for the observation of lattice fringes and defects at the atomic scale, which is crucial for understanding the material's properties [8].

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

SEM offers high-resolution imaging of the surface morphology of nanomaterials. It is particularly useful for examining the topography and compositional features of nanoparticles [9]. Techniques such as field emission SEM (FESEM) enhance imaging capabilities by providing higher resolution and better contrast [10].

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

AFM provides topographical maps of nanomaterials by scanning the surface with a sharp probe. It is capable of measuring mechanical properties like hardness and elasticity, as well as the surface roughness at the nanometer scale. Additionally, AFM can be used to study interactions between nanoparticles and their environment.

X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

XRD is essential for identifying the crystalline phases and determining the size of nanocrystals. The technique involves measuring the diffraction patterns of X-rays as they interact with the material's atomic lattice, providing insights into the crystallographic structure and phase purity.

Dynamic Light scattering (DLS)

DLS measures the size distribution and stability of nanoparticles in solution based on the fluctuations in scattered light intensity. This technique is widely used for characterizing colloidal nanoparticles and understanding their dispersion properties.

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)

XPS is employed to analyze the elemental composition and chemical states of nanomaterials' surfaces. By measuring the binding energies of core electrons, XPS provides detailed information about the surface chemistry and oxidation states of the elements present.

Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)

FTIR is used to identify functional groups and molecular bonding within nanomaterials. The technique involves measuring the absorption of infrared light by the material, which provides information on its chemical structure and interactions.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy

NMR spectroscopy provides insights into the local environment of nuclei within nanomaterials, offering information on molecular dynamics and interactions. It is particularly useful for studying organic or hybrid nanomaterials.

Raman spectroscopy

Raman spectroscopy provides information about molecular vibrations and is useful for characterizing the phonon modes of nanomaterials. It is especially valuable for studying carbon-based nanomaterials like graphene and carbon nanotubes.

Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopie (UV-Vis)

UV-Vis spectroscopy is commonly used to study the optical properties of nanomaterials. It provides information about electronic transitions and can be used to monitor the size and shape of nanoparticles based on their absorption and scattering characteristics.

Conclusion

Characterizing nanomaterials requires a diverse set of techniques due to their unique and complex properties. Each technique offers distinct advantages and limitations, making it crucial to select the appropriate methods based on the specific characteristics of the nanomaterials under investigation. Advances in these techniques continue to enhance our ability to understand and manipulate nanomaterials, leading to innovations across various scientific and industrial domains. As nanotechnology evolves, ongoing improvements in characterization methods will play a vital role in advancing research and applications in this dynamic field.

References

1. Ismaili K, Hall M, Donner C, Thomas D, Vermeylen D, et al. (2003) Results of systematic screening for minor degrees of fetal renal pelvis dilatation in an unselected population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188: 242-246.

Google Scholar Crossref

2. Coplen DE, Austin PF, Yan Y, Blanco VM, Dicke JM (2006) The magnitude of fetal renal pelvic dilatation can identify obstructive postnatal hydronephrosis, and direct postnatal evaluation and management. J Urol 176: 724-727.

Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Grignon A, Filion R, Filiatrault D, Robitaille P, Homsy Y, et al. (1986) Urinary tract dilatation in utero: classification and clinical applications. Radio 160: 645-647.

Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Ocheke IE, Antwi S, Gajjar P, McCulloch MI, Nourse P (2014) Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction at Red Cross Children’s Hospital, Cape Town:a six year review. Arab J Nephro Tran 7: 33-36.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

5. Capello SA, Kogan BA, Giorgi LJ (2005) Kaufman RP. Prenatal ultrasound has led to earlier detection and repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 174: 1425-1428.

Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Rao NP, Shailaja U, Mallika KJ, Desai SS, Debnath P (2012) Traditional Use Of Swarnamrita Prashana As A Preventive Measure: Evidence Based Observational Study In Children. IJRiAP 3: 1-5.

Indexed at Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Aniket P, Pallavi D, Aziz A, Avinash K, Vikas S (2017) Clinical effect of suvarna bindu prashan. JAIMS 2: 11-18.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

8. Gaikwad A (2011) A Comparative pharmaco-clinical study of Madhu-Ghrita and SwarnaVacha Madhu-Ghrita on neonates. Ayurved MD Research thesis. Jam 12: 2-7.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Singh (2016) A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on Swarna Prashana and its Immunomodulatory Activity in Neonates. Jam 24: 4-9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Rathi R, Rathi B (2017) Efficacy of Suvarnaprashan in Preterm infants-A Comparative Pilot study J Ind Sys Med 5: 91.

Google Scholar, Crossref