ISSN: 2572-4983

Neonatal and Pediatric Medicine
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Mini Review   
  • Neonat Pediatr Med, Vol 7(6)
  • DOI: 10.4172/2572-4983.1000214

Challenges with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Migration in Neonates

Ceyda Acun*
Department of Neonatology, Cleveland Clinic Children’s, Cleveland, OH, USA
*Corresponding Author: Ceyda Acun, Department of Neonatology, M31-37, Cleveland Clinic Children’s, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA, Tel: +1216 444 2568, Email: AcunC@ccf.org

Received: 24-May-2021 / Accepted Date: 04-Jun-2021 / Published Date: 11-Jun-2021 DOI: 10.4172/2572-4983.1000214

Abstract

The use of peripherally inserted central catheter in neonatal intensive care unit is a common practice, but it is associated with various complications. Catheter migration is the most common complication in neonates. The incidence of PICC migration in neonates ranges from 8% to 33%. The majority of the PICC migration is seen in first 3 days after PICC placement. Periodic imaging is strongly recommended to monitor the PICC tip position. X-Ray is still the standard method for evaluation of the PICC tip position, but supportive evidence of point of care ultrasound is increasing.

Keywords: Neonates; Complications; Migration

Introduction

The number of extremely low-birth-weight infants and the number of neonates requiring surgical procedures are increasing with continuing progress in clinical practices which enhances the importance of reliable lines to provide long-term parenteral nutrition to support their growth. Peripheral intravenous and umbilical catheters have a limited dwell time and increased risk of complications which limit their use. Surgically inserted central venous catheters have been successfully placed in neonates but are more costly when compared to other techniques. The use of Peripherally Inserted Catheters (PICC) is a safe and reliable technique for providing vascular access in neonates which was first described in 1973 by Shaw [1]. Although the use of PICC in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) is a common practice, it is associated with various complications including infection, thrombosis, dysrhythmias, pericardial effusion, pleural effusion, neurological complications and malposition of catheter [2-5]. Catheter migration is the most common complication in neonates [6]. Catheter migration occurs when the catheter tip location changes from a satisfactory documented post-insertion location to a different location after initial placement. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the tip of the PICC should reside in the superior vena cava for upper-body insertions and the thoracic inferior vena cava above the level of diaphragm for lower extremity insertions and recommended that ‘the catheter tip should not be placed in or be allowed to migrate into the heart’ [7,8]. The position for the superior vena cava has been described as the T3-T5 level, but varies depending on radiographic technique and infant anatomy. The lower one-half to one-third of the superior vena cava as the ideal top location for upper body insertions. Appropriate catheter tip placement in the inferior vena cava is between the right atrium and the diaphragm, described as T8-T10. Catheters whose tips reside outside the superior vena cava or inferior vena cava are associated with 3 to 8 times higher risk of a PICC-related complications [7-10].

The movement of PICCs within the body may occur spontaneously or as a result of extremity movement and position [11,12]. Consistent patient positioning is very important to monitor PICC tip migration. Variations in the position of the extremity of the insertion site can lead to misinterpretation of the radiograph for catheter migration and subsequent unnecessary withdrawal or exchange of the catheter. The optimal patient position for radiographic monitoring is unclear. It has been recommended that radiographs should consistently be taken in a position tip location closest to right atrium to minimize the risk of the catheter moving further inward with patient movements [2]. Most research suggest that upper extremity adduction during placement confirmation radiographs results in PICC tips in the deepest central location, regardless of the specific vein cannulated [11-13].

Incidence and Timing

The incidence of PICC migration ranges from 8% to 33% in neonates [14-17]. There has been only one study that specifically investigated the timing of PICC migration in neonates. In this study, 83% of the migration was detected within 3 days after PICC placement [17]. Another study investigated the risk factors for PICC complications which reported 8.1% of line malposition overall with 4.1% occurring within the first 72 hours, and 4% after 72 hours [16]. Zaghloul et al. also has reported that PICC tip malposition rate decreases over time [18].

Risk Factors

Wen and colleagues reported that premature infants with birth weight >1500 gram were less likely to have PICC complication than infants with birth weight ≤ 1500 gram [19]. Pet and colleagues also reported that prematurity (gestational age at birth <37 weeks) was associated with an increased risk of malposition over time [16].

Some studies reported less migration in lower extremity PICCs than upper extremity PICCs in neonates [15,16,20].

In one study PICC migration was associated with difficulty advancing PICC at insertion and with dressing change [17].

Gnant colleagues reported that silicone PICCs move less than PICCs made of polyurethane in pediatric patients [21].

For neonates with prolonged PICC duration, growth can also effect catheter tip location, but it is challenging to assess the association between PICC migration and growth in neonates because the majority of PICCs are only needed for a short period of time, especially in premature infants.

Signs and Symptoms

Catheter migration may be asymptomatic. The symptoms of reported cases with PICC migration including; pain and irritability, erythema or edema, change in catheter function (difficulty flushing or withdrawing), change in visible measurable length of external catheter segment, symptoms specific to a particular complication (i.e., dysrhythmia, pericardial or pleural effusion) [22].

Monitoring

Radiographic monitoring and reconfirmation of the catheter tip location is invaluable in detecting migration and malposition of the catheter [17,23,24], but there is no uniform practice in the NICU for radiographic confirmation of the catheter tip location. X-Ray still is the standard method used for evaluation of the PICC tip position. Consistent positioning when X-rays are taken is very important, variations in the position can lead to misinterpretation for catheter migration. Several recent studies examining PICC tip location, performed in more than 400 neonates, demonstrated that concordance between X-ray and ultrasound was 59-94% [18,25-29]. Ultrasound has less turn-around time, no radiation exposure, also allows staff to immediately manipulate the line at the time of insertion to an appropriate position. One of the barriers to the widespread use of ultrasound is the highly operator-dependent nature of this technology. Catheter tips “within the liver”, outside of the vena cava may cause diagnostic challenges [30], also hyper inflated lung, pneumothorax, and gaseous abdomens may obscure tip position location [26].

Prevention

Prevention of PICC migration is limited due to dynamic factors, such as tortuous course of vessels and movement of blood around PICC in the first couple of days after insertion. Every NICU needs to have PICC guidelines and monitor their complications closely. Current strategies that minimize the risk of migration include;

1. Maintaining the security of the catheter with intact dressing and secure device.

2. Verifying the catheter tip location upon insertion, 3rd day after PICC placement as most migration occurred within three days after insertion [17,22] and an ongoing basis.

3. Meticulous documentation of the external catheter length before and during dressing changes and obtaining imaging after dressing change if there is a change in measurement.

4. Consistent extremity positioning when imaging is performed [2,11-13].

Conclusion

PICC migration is the most common PICC related complication in neonates. Prevention of the PICC migration is limited, including maintaining the security of the catheter, documentation of the external length during dressing changes and monitoring PICC tip location periodically. X-Ray is still the standard method for evaluation of the PICC tip position, but supportive evidence and use of point of care ultrasound is increasing. According to current literature we recommend to confirm the tip of PICC location at 12-24 hours, 3rd day after PICC placement and an ongoing basis per each NICU unit’s protocols. More research is needed to determine the frequency of imaging to monitor PICC tip location and to investigate the risk factors associated with PICC migration in neonates.

Disclosure Statements

The author has no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

  1. Shaw JCL ( 1973) Parenteral nutrition in the management of sick low birth-weight infants. Pediatr Clin North Am 20:333-358.
  2. Nadroo AM, Lin J Green RS, Magid MS, Holzman IR ( 2001) Death as a complication of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates. J Pediat 138 :599-601
  3. Trotter CW( 2009) Inadvertent catheterization of the ascending lumbar vein. Neonatal Netw. 28:179-83
  4. Evans M, Lentsch D(1999) Percutaneously inserted polyurethane central catheters in the NICU: One unit’s experience. Neonatal Netw 18:37-46
  5. Payne R, Sieg EP, Choudhary A, Lantosca M. Pneumorrhachis(2016) Resulting in Transient Paresis after PICC Line Insertion into the Ascending Lumbar Vein
  6. Sharpe E, Kuhn L, Ratz D, Krein SL, Chopra V(2017) Neonatal peripherally inserted central catheter practices and providers: Results from the neonatal picc survey. Adv Neonatal Care. 17:209-21
  7. Food and Drug Administration(1989). FDA Drug Bulletin: Precautions Necessary with Central Venous Catheters. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration 19:15-6
  8. Scott WL(1995) Central venous catheters. An overview of Food and Drug administration activities. Surg Oncol Clin N AM. 4:377-93.
  9. Colacchio K, Deng Y, NorthrupV, Bizarro MJ(2012) Complications associated with central and non-central venous catheters in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 32:941-6.
  10. Jumani K, Advani S, Reich NG, Gosey L, Milstone AM(2013) Risk factors for peripherally inserted central venous catheter complications in children. JAMA Pediatr 167:429-35
  11. Connolly B, Amaral J, Walsh S, Temple M, Chait P, et al. (2006) Influence of arm movement on central tip location of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Pediatr Radiol 36:845-50
  12. Nadroo Am, Glass RB, Lin J, Green RS, Holzman IR(2002). Changes in upper extremity position cause migration of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates. Pediatrics 110:131-6.
  13. Newberry DM, Young TE, Robertson T, Levy J, Brandon D(2014) Evaluation of neonatal peripherally inserted central catheter tip movement in a consistent upper extremity position. Advances in Neonatal Care 14:61-8
  14. Gupta R, Drendel AL, Hoffmann RG, Quijano CV, Uhing MR (2016) Migration of central venous catheters in Neonates. A radiographic assessment. American Journal of Perinatology 33:600-4
  15. Srinivasan HB, Tjin ATA, Galang R, Hecht A, Srinivasan G (2013) Migration patterns of peripherally inserted central venous catheters at 24 hours post insertion in neonates. American Journal of Perinatology 30:871-4.
  16. Pet GC, Eickhoff JC, McNevin KE, Do J, Mcadams RM (2020) Risk factors for peripherally inserted central catheter complications in neonates. J Perinat 40:581-8
  17. Acun C, Baker A, Brown LS, Iglesia KA, Sisman J (2021) Peripherally inserted central catheter migration in neonates: Incidence, timing and risk factors. J Neonatal Perinatal
  18. Zaghloul N, Watkins L, Choi-Rosen J, Perveen S, Kurepa D (2019) The superiority of point of care ultrasound in localizing central venous line tip position over time. Eur J Pediatr. 178:173-9.
  19. Wen J, Yu Q, Chen H, Chen N, Huang S, Cai W (2017) Peripherally inserted central venous catheter-associated complications exert negative effects on body weight gain in neonatal intensive care units. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 26:1-5.
  20. Wrightson DD(2013) Peripherally inserted central catheter complications in neonates with upper versus lower extremity insertion sites. Adv Neonatal Care 13:198-204
  21. Gnannt R, Connolly BL, Parra DA, Amaral J, Moineddin R, et al. (2016) Variables decreasing tip movement of peripherally inserted central catheters in pediatric patients. Pediatr Radiol 46:1532-8
  22. Wyckoff M, Sharpe E. Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Guideline for practice. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: National Association of Neonatal Nurses 2015.
  23. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA (2011) Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter related infections. Clin Infect Dis 52:e162-93.
  24. Chathas MK, Paton JB (1997) Meeting the special nutritional needs of sick infants with a percutaneous central venous catheter quality assurance program. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 10:72-87.
  25. Jain A, McNamara PJ, Ng E, El-Khuffash A (2012) The use of targeted neonatal echocardiography to confirm placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates. Am J Perinatol 29:101-6.
  26. McGee WT, Mailloux PT, Martin RT (2011) Safe placement of central venous catheters: A measured approach. J Intensive Care Med 26:392-6.
  27. Ohki Y, Tabata M, Kuwashima M, Takeuchi H, Nako Y, et al. (2000) Ultrasonographic detection of very thin percutaneous central venous catheter in neonates. Acta Paediatr 89:1381-4.
  28. Tauzin L, Sigur N, Joubert C, Parra J, Hassid S, et al. (2013) Echocardiography allows more accurate placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in low birthweight infants. Acta Paediatr;102:703-6
  29. Katheria AC, Fleming SE, Kim JH (2013) A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided peripherally inserted central catheters compared with standard radiograph in neonates. J Perinatol 33:791-4.
  30. Brissaud O, Harper L, Lamireau D, Jouvencel P, Fayon M (2010) Sonography-guided positioning of intravenous long lines in neonates. Eur J Radiol 74:e18-e21.

Citation: Acun A (2021) Challenges with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Migration in Neonates. Neonat Pediatr Med 7:214. DOI: 10.4172/2572-4983.1000214

Copyright: &copy; 2021 Acun A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top