Journal of Biotechnology & Biomaterials
Open Access

Biotechnology; Biofuels; Pharmaceuticals; Glyco engineering; Cellulosic binding modules

Introduction

Yeast, particularly the well-studied Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has been a workhorse in biotechnology, playing a crucial role in the production of biofuels, pharmaceuticals, and various industrial chemicals. Recent advancements in biotechnological research have spotlighted the potential of cell surface engineering as a transformative strategy to enhance the functionality and versatility of yeast strains. This innovative approach involves modifying the outer layer of yeast cells, unlocking new possibilities for improved substrate utilization, product formation, and interaction with diverse environments.

Strategies for yeast cell surface engineering

Display systems: Display systems, such as the use of cell surface proteins or peptides, enable the presentation of heterologous proteins on the yeast cell surface. This strategy facilitates the direct interaction of the engineered yeast with specific substrates or target molecules [1].

Glyco engineering: Glycosylation patterns on the yeast cell surface play a crucial role in various cellular processes. Engineering these glycosylation patterns can impact protein folding, stability, and interaction with other molecules, thereby influencing the overall performance of the yeast strain [2].

Cellulosic binding modules: Incorporating cellulosic binding modules on the yeast cell surface enhances its ability to adhere to lignocellulosic substrates. This is particularly valuable in biofuel production, where efficient breakdown of plant biomass is a critical step [3].

Surface display of enzymes: Displaying enzymes directly on the yeast cell surface offers a unique advantage in industrial processes. This approach simplifies downstream processing, as the engineered yeast cells themselves become catalysts for specific reactions [4].

Synthetic biology approaches: Synthetic biology tools, including CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing, provide precise control over the yeast cell surface characteristics. This allows for the targeted introduction of genetic modifications to achieve desired functionalities [5].

Applications of yeast cell surface engineering

Biofuel production: Enhanced substrate binding and enzymatic activity on the yeast cell surface contributes to improved efficiency in biofuel production. Yeast strains engineered for optimal interaction with lignocellulosic biomass hold promise for advancing sustainable bioenergy technologies [6].

Biocatalysts and enzyme immobilization: Yeast cells engineered to display enzymes on their surface serve as effective biocatalysts. This immobilization strategy simplifies enzyme recovery and reuse, making industrial processes more economically viable [7].

Pharmaceutical production: Yeast cell surface engineering enables the display of therapeutic proteins and peptides, streamlining the production of pharmaceuticals. This approach offers advantages in terms of simplified downstream processing and increased protein yields [8].

Biosensors and bio adsorbents: Engineered yeast strains with modified cell surfaces can be employed as biosensors or bio adsorbents for environmental monitoring and remediation. Their tailored binding capabilities make them valuable tools for detecting specific molecules or removing pollutants from various environments [9].

Customized interactions in fermentation: Tailoring yeast cell surface properties allows for customized interactions in fermentation processes. This can influence the adhesion of yeast cells to specific substrates or enhance their resistance to harsh fermentation conditions [10].

Conclusion

In conclusion, yeast cell surface engineering represents a promising avenue in biotechnology, offering a toolkit to tailor yeast strains for specific applications. As our understanding of yeast biology and synthetic biology tools continues to advance, the potential for creating designer yeast strains with enhanced functionalities will likely revolutionize diverse industries, making yeast an even more versatile and powerful platform for biotechnological innovations.

1. Halverson KM (2005) Anthrax biosensor, protective antigen ion channel asymmetric blockade. J Biol Chem 280:34056–62.

Indexed at, Coss ref , Google Scholar

2. Bayley H, Martin CR (2000) Resistive-pulse sensing – From microbes to molecules. Chem Rev 100:2575–94.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

3. Graham MD (2003). The Coulter principle: Foundation of an industry. J Lab Autom 8:72–81.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

4. Wang C, Zou P, Yang C, Liu L, Cheng L, et al. (2019). Dynamic modifications of biomacromolecules: mechanism and chemical interventions.Sci China Life Sci62: 1459-1471.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

5. Prosdocimi F, Farias ST, José MV (2022) Prebiotic chemical refugia: multifaceted scenario for the formation of biomolecules in primitive Earth.Theory Biosci141: 339-347.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

6. Wanunu M (2012) Nanopores: A journey towards DNA sequencing.Phys Life Rev 125-158.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

7. Hazen RM (2006). Mineral surfaces and the prebiotic selection and organization of biomolecules.Am Mineral 91: 1715.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

8. Vay LK, Mutschler H (2019) The difficult case of an RNA-only origin of life.Emerg Top Life Sci3: 469-475.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

9. Deblois RW, Bean CP, Wesley RKA (1977) Electrokinetic measurements with submicron particles and pores by resistive pulse technique. J Colloid Interface Sci 61:323–35.

Indexed at, Crossref, Google Scholar

10. Kasianowicz JJ, Robertson JWF, Chan ER, Reiner JE, Stanford VM (2008). Annual review of analytical chemistry. Annual Reviews 1:737–66.

Indexed at, Google Scholar