ISSN: 2161-0711

Journal of Community Medicine & Health Education
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Opinion Article   
  • J Community Med Health Educ, Vol 11(7)
  • DOI: 10.4172/2161-0711.1000714

Care of the ICU Survivor: What Primary Care Providers Need to Know?

Karen Korzick*, Daniel Lepone, Erin Hall, Katherine Kelley, Cynthia Beiter and Hilary Hayhurst
*Corresponding Author: Dr. Karen Korzick, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States, Email: kakorzick@geisinger.edu

DOI: 10.4172/2161-0711.1000714

View PDF Download PDF

Introduction

There are increasing numbers of ICU survivors who remain complexly ill with prolonged sequelae of their ICU stay post hospital discharge. These patients have Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS), which affects one or more of three domains: physical health, behavioral health, and/or cognitive health. PICS increases mortality, morbidity, and consumption of health care resources [1-7]. PICS can also affect family members (PICS-F) [1,8]. Patients who survive ARDS, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, sepsis or prolonged delirium are at greatest risk for PICS [2-7,9]. PICS are not limited to elderly or chronically ill patients and can cause transient or permanent disabilities [2-4].

Recognition and management of PICS and PICS-F is crucial for patient and family caregiver recovery. While it is ideal to have ICU Survivor clinics, the reality is most ICU survivors currently receive their ICU recovery care from their primary care provider. Unfortunately, current primary care processes appear to be inadequate to meet the needs of PICS patients [4,10-13]. Given newly acquired behavioral health and cognitive dysfunctions in a significant proportion of ICU survivors, discharge and primary care processes that presume these patients are cognitively normal and can understand, retain and recall health education provided at discharge or by brief case management contact post discharge is dubious. To date, there is no proven best process to care for PICS and PICS-F, however some interventions are effective, and it is likely a combination of these interventions is required. Beneficial interventions include ICU survivor clinics, ICU diaries, ICU support groups and close follow up and coordination of care [4,14,15].

Geisinger’s ICU Survivor Care Process is an interprofessional team approach to identify and treat PICS and PICS-F. Our care process starts while patients are in the hospital and delivers intensive case management by an experienced Nurse Case Manager (RN CM) through the first ICU survivor clinic about 4 weeks after return to home and for at least 90 days post hospital discharge [4]. Our RN CM provides recurrent telephonic education, support, and guidance on issues of recovery and navigating a complex healthcare system. Our first clinic visit is three hours long and includes a one hour evaluation with imbedded education by each of a neuropsychologist, a psychologist, and an intensivist to ensure every domain of PICS has been assessed, a patient specific treatment plan has been developed, and patient and family caregiver comprehension of the recovery care plan, and signs and symptoms for which they should contact the RN CM, is maximized. This comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach is likely the source of the statistically significant reduced mortality rates, the first care process in the ICU survivor literature to achieve this result, as well as a financially significant reduction in readmission events and a significant net cost savings attained by our care process [4].

Behavioral health in ICU survivors

There is a significant prevalence of psychological sequel experienced by patients and caregivers following ICU admission. PICS may include any combination of psychiatric symptoms or disorders, most commonly depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorders (PTSD) [16]. Rates of psychological morbidity vary: roughly 30% of survivors experience depression [5,17-19], one in five survivors experience PTSD [5,16-18,20], and one in three survivors experience clinically significant anxiety [5,16,21]. Specific risk factors have been identified to increase the likelihood of psychological distress, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome [5].

In addition, PICS-F encompasses symptoms of distress in patient caregivers or family members, such as problems with sleep, anxiety, depression, PTSD, and complicated grief, that occur during or following the acute hospitalization or death of the loved one [8,16]. Prior studies suggest that caregivers commonly suffer from depression [22-29], more than half experience anxiety [22,24-26], and PTSD may be prolonged in one third of family caregivers [22-24,26-29].

Many psychological symptoms may not be apparent or offered by patients or caregivers if not asked appropriate questions to elicit them. In our clinic, we have observed a difference on self-report questionnaires versus by verbal report from patients, with symptoms gathered by patient interview frequently representing more severe symptomology. It is not uncommon that patients will disclose more distress as the appointment progresses. This is likely due to an increased comfort level and information gathering that normalizes distress in patients and caregivers. Our patients commonly report symptoms of depression, sleep problems, nightmares, anxiety about future negative health events, and symptoms of PTSD. We have found distress in caregivers to vary as well – with some demonstrating significant PTSD, fears of leaving the patient alone, and of the possibility of the patient’s premature death in the future.

No mental health screening tools have been validated for use in PICS, although multiple screening tools are useful for identifying psychological distress. We use three screeners to assess for symptoms of anxiety, depression and PTSD: the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) [30], the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) [31], and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5) [32]. These are completed by both the patient and primary caregiver, if present. Questionnaires are an easy way to assess for distress in any setting in which an ICU survivor or caregiver is seen post discharge. It is recommended that screening for distress be done in two step fashion, initially screening patients using brief measures in an outpatient clinic setting and, if indicated, referral for more complete assessment of PICS by specialized providers [33].

Neurocognitive health in ICU survivors

Cognitive dysfunction impacts 30%-80% of ICU survivors, with executive functioning the most common domain affected [34], although memory, attention/processing speed, and verbal fluency can be impacted [2,33,35-37]. ICU survivors are at higher risk of developing dementia [33,38], especially if they experienced ICU delirium. Post- ICU cognitive dysfunction can diminish judgment/insight and the ability to adequately follow hospital discharge recommendations and/ or adhere to new medication regimens, as well as engage in successful management of activities of daily living (ADLs) and/or instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs).

Neurocognitive screening early in recovery is vital to ensure ICU survivors receive necessary care, with referral for neuropsychological testing, cognitive rehabilitation, or neurology referrals, as needed. Screening measures are not intended to be diagnostic and are not equivalent to a full neuropsychological evaluation, as neuropsychologists rely heavily on normative data from a standardized sample, as well as their clinical judgment and training. Medical professionals, including home healthcare staff, can perform basic screening to assess ICU survivors. A clock drawing task can quickly screen for executive dysfunction [39]. Word list recall is sensitive to memory impairment [40], a frequent concern in this population. The Mini-Cog is a 3 min-5 min screening tool that incorporates both executive functioning and memory, is simple to learn and administer, and requires only a form and a pen [41]. In older adults, it is beneficial to obtain a measure of semantic fluency (i.e., animal naming), which can be used to determine if there is risk of an incipient neurodegenerative process, such as Alzheimer’s disease. Although the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has been favored in the literature, it now requires training, approval to administer and does not account for age or specific education level, which is imperative when determining a decline from cognitive baseline [42].

Research has shown a significant relationship between executive functioning and ability to complete IADLs [43-45]. An informant report of cognitive functioning (i.e., Quick Dementia Rating Scale: QDRS) [46], and an informant report of IADLs (i.e., Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale) [47], can help assess functional and cognitive status, if a caregiver is available. Cutoff scores are provided and help to delineate when a referral to neuropsychology is appropriate.

Our neuropsychologist performs cognitive assessment with a combination of clinical interview and brief neurocognitive screening to determine the need for further evaluation. We use the Cognistat Five, a graded measure designed for rapid testing of mild cognitive impairment Vs dementia. This is a shorter version than the original Cognistat and is convenient for serial testing.

Many of our patients describe mental fogginess since hospitalization, but there is not always a corresponding decline on objective cognitive measures. There are many factors in addition to general recovery that may exacerbate cognitive dysfunction, such as mood/anxiety, medical history/cerebrovascular risk factors, education/neurodevelopmental history, pain, adjustment/acceptance to physical limitations, sleep, appetite, psychosocial stressors, and medications.

Conclusion

We are deeply concerned that current primary care processes do not meet the needs of a significant proportion of PICS patients. This patient population requires thorough screening of all three domains of PICS, as well as potentially very complex coordination of care that is beyond the ability of the patient or their family caregiver to pursue unassisted in the first weeks on return to home. In our System, a primary care provider is allotted 40 minutes for the first visit post hospital discharge for an ICU survivor, regardless of the complexity of their PICS. This places an overwhelming burden on primary care providers and creates a disservice to ICU survivors, who depend on their primary care provider to keep track of all the details of their complex care needs in recovery. It is imperative that access to psychologists and neurocognitive specialists is available for primary care providers caring for PICS patients suffering from newly acquired and persistent behavioral or neurocognitive dysfunctions. A significant opportunity exists for research on how to help primary care providers improve their care delivery to PICS patients in a time efficient but medically effective manner, to deliver education to primary care providers on the importance of screening for all three domains of PICS, and for health care systems to re-examine their current processes of care delivery by primary care providers for PICS patients.

Based on the evaluation of the workshop, better workshop will be held in future to develop a better program. These collaborative workshops could help developing feasible obesity prevention programs as well as development of human resources of school health in urban Uganda.

References

  1. Wunsch H, Guerra C, Barnato A, Angus D, Li G, et al. (2010) Three-year outcomes for medicare beneficiaries who survive intensive care. J American Med Asso 303(9): 849-856.
  2. Pandharipande P, Girard T, Jackson J, Morandi, A, Thompson J, et al. (2013) Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. N Engl J Med 369: 1306-1316.
  3. Herridge M, Tansey C, Matté A, Tomlinson G, Diaz-Granados N, et al. (2011) Functional disability 5 years after Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 364(14): 1293-1304.
  4. Snell K, Beiter C, Hall E, Junod A, Wilson B, et al. (2020) A Novel Approach to ICU survivor care: A population health quality improvement project. Crit Care Med. 48(12): e1164-e1170.
  5. Mikkelsen M, Christie J, Lanken P, Biester R, Thompson B, et al. (2012) The adult respiratory distress syndrome cognitive outcomes study: Long-term neuropsychological function in survivors of acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 185: 1307–1315.
  6. Davydow D, Hough C, Zatzick D, Katon W (2014) Psychiatric symptoms and acute care service utilization over the course of the year following medical-surgical ICU admission: A longitudinal investigation. Crit Care Med. 42:2473–2481.
  7. Herridge M, Moss M, Hough C, Hopkins R, Rice T, et al. (2016) Recovery and outcomes after the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in patients and their family caregivers. Intensive Care Med. 42(5): 725–738.
  8. Davidson J, Jones C, Bienvenu O (2012) Family response to critical illness: Postintensive care syndrome-family. Crit Care Med 40(2): 618-624.
  9. Harvey M, Davidson J. (2016) Postintensive care syndrome: right care, right now…and later. Crit Care Med 44(2): 381-385.
  10. Loeb D, Bayliss E, Candrian C, DeGruy F, Binswanger I. (2016) Primary care providers’ experiences caring for complex patients in primary care: A qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 17: 34.
  11. Bodenheimer T, Chen E, Bennett H (2009) Confronting the growing burden of chronic disease: Can the US health care workforce do the job? Health Aff 28(1): 64–74.
  12. Okie S. (2012) The evolving primary care physician. N Engl J Med. 366: 1849–1853.
  13. Goroll A, Hunt D (2015) Bridging the hospitalist-primary care divide through collaborative care. N Engl J Med 372(4): 308–309.
  14. McPeake J, Boehm L, Hibbert E, Bakhru R, Bastin A, et al. (2020) Key components of ICU recovery programs: What did patients report provided benefit? Crit Care Explor 2(4), e0088.
  15. McPeake J, Iwashyna T, Boehm L, Hibbert E, Bakhru R, et al. (2021) Benefits of peer support for intensive care unit survivors: Sharing experiences, care debriefing, and altruism. Am J Crit Care 30(2): 145-149.
  16. Needham D, Davidson J, Cohen H, Hopkins R, Weinert C, et al. (2012) Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders' conference. Crit Care Med 40(2): 502-509.
  17. Jackson J, Pandharipande P, Girard T, Brummel N, Thompson J, et al. (2014) Depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and functional disability in the BRAIN-ICU study: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2(5): 369-379. 
  18. Patel M, Jackson J, Morandi A, Girard T, Hughes C, et al. (2016) Incidence and risk factors for intensive care unit-related post-traumatic stress disorder in veterans and civilians. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 193(12): 1373-1381.
  19. Davydow D, Gifford J, Desai S, Bienvenu O, Needham D (2009) Depression in general intensive care unit survivors: A systematic review. Intensive Care Med 35(5): 796-809.
  20. Davydow D, Gifford J, Desai S, Needham D, Bienvenu O. (2008) Posttraumatic stress disorder in general intensive care unit survivors: A systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 30(5): 421-434.
  21. Nikayin, S, Rabiee, A, Hashem M, Huang M, Bienvenu O, et al. (2016) Anxiety symptoms in survivors of critical illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 43; 23-29.
  22. Gries C, Engelberg R, Kross E, Zatzick D, Nielsen E, et al. (2010) Predictors of symptoms of posttraumatic stress and depression in family members after patient death in the ICU. Chest 137(2): 280-287.
  23. Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, Chevret S, Aboab J, et al. (2005) Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171(9): 987-994.
  24. Jones C, Skirrow P, Griffiths R, Humphris G, Ingleby S, et al. (2004) Post-traumatic stress disorder-related symptoms in relatives of patients following intensive care. Intensive Care Med 30(3): 456-460.
  25. McAdam J, Dracup K, White D, Fontaine D, Puntillo K. (2010) Symptom experiences of family members of intensive care unit patients at high risk for dying. Crit Care Med 38(4): 1078-1085.
  26. Harlan E, Miller J, Costa D, Fagerlin A, Iwashyna T, et al. (2020) Emotional Experiences and Coping Strategies of Family Members of Critically Ill Patients. Chest 158(4): 1464-1472.
  27. Anderson W, Arnold R, Angus D, Bryce C (2008) Posttraumatic stress and complicated grief in family members of patients in the intensive care unit. J Gen Intern Med 23(11): 1871-1876.
  28. Paparrigopoulos T, Melissaki A, Efthymiou A, Tsekou H, Vadala C, et al. (2006) Short-term psychological impact on family members of intensive care unit patients. J Psychosom Res 61(5): 719-722.
  29. Petrinec A, Martin B (2018) Post-intensive care syndrome symptoms and health-related quality of life in family decision-makers of critically ill patients. Palliat Support Care 16(6): 719-724
  30. Kroenke K, Spitzer R, Williams J (2001) The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 16(9): 606-613.
  31. Spitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams J, Löwe B (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Medicine 166(10): 1092-1097.
  32. Blevins C, Weathers F, Davis M, Witte T, Domino J (2015) The Posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation. J Trauma Stress 28(6): 489-498.
  33. Spies C, Krampe H, Paul N, Denke C, Kiselev J, et al. (2021) Instruments to measure outcomes of post-intensive care syndrome in outpatient care settings: Results of an expert consensus and feasibility field test. J Intensive Care Soc 22(2): 159-174.
  34. Myers E, Smith D, Allen S, Kaplan L (2016) Post-ICU syndrome: Rescuing the undiagnosed. JAAPA 29(4): 34-37.
  35. Wolters A, Slooter A, van der Kooi A, van Dijk D (2013) Cognitive impairment after intensive care unit admission: A systematic review. Intensive Care Med 39(3): 376-386.
  36. Rengel K, Hayhurst C, Pandharipande P, Hughes C (2019) Long-term cognitive and functional impairments after critical illness. Anesth Analg 128(4): 772-780.
  37. Sakusic A, Rabinstein A (2018) Cognitive outcomes after critical illness. Curr OpinCrit Care 24(5): 410-414.
  38. Guerra C, Hua M, Wunsch H (2015) Risk of a diagnosis of dementia for elderly medicare beneficiaries after intensive care. Anesthesiology 123(5): 1105-1112.
  39. Strauss E, Sherman E, Spreen O (2006) A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.), Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
  40. Gavett B, Horwitz J (2012) Immediate list recall as a measure of short-term episodic memory: Insights from the serial position effect and item response theory. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 27(2): 125-135. 
  41. Doerflinger D (2007) How to try this: The Mini-Cog. Am J Nurs 107(12): 62-71.
  42. Nasreddine Z, Phillips N, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, et al. (2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment J Am Geriatr Soc 53(4): 695-699.
  43. Bell-McGinty S, Podell K, Franzen M, Baird A, Williams M. (2002) Standard measures of executive function in predicting instrumental activities of daily living in older adults. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 17(9): 828-834.
  44. Cahn-Weiner D, Boyle P, Malloy P (2002) Tests of executive function predict instrumental activities of daily living in community-dwelling older individuals. Appl Neuropsychol 9(3): 187-191.
  45. Jefferson A, Paul R, Ozonoff A, Cohen R (2006) Evaluating elements of executive functioning as predictors of instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Arch Clin Neuropsychol  21(4): 311-320.
  46. Galvin J (2015) The Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS): A rapid dementia staging tool. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 1(2): 249-259. 
  47. Lawton M, Brody E (1969) Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9(3): 179-186.
Post Your Comment Citation
Share This Article
Recommended Journals
Viewmore
Open Access Journals
Viewmore
Article Tools
Article Usage
  • Total views: 2243
  • [From(publication date): 0-2021 - Nov 23, 2024]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views: 1685
  • PDF downloads: 558

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh
Peer Reviewed Journals

Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals

Journals by Subject

Agri and Aquaculture Biochemistry Bioinformatics & Systems Biology Biomedical Sciences Business & Management Chemical Engineering Chemistry Clinical Sciences Computer Science Economics & Accounting Engineering Environmental Sciences Food & Nutrition General Science Genetics & Molecular Biology
Geology & Earth Science Immunology & Microbiology Informatics Materials Science Mathematics Medical Sciences Nanotechnology Neuroscience & Psychology Nursing & Health Care Pharmaceutical Sciences Physics Plant Sciences Social & Political Sciences Veterinary Sciences

Clinical & Medical Journals

Anesthesiology Cardiology Clinical Research Dentistry Dermatology Diabetes & Endocrinology Gasteroenterology Genetics Haematology Healthcare Immunology Infectious Diseases Medicine Microbiology
Molecular Biology Nephrology Neurology Nursing Nutrition Oncology Ophthalmology Orthopaedics Pathology Pediatrics Physicaltherapy & Rehabilitation
Psychiatry Pulmonology Radiology Reproductive Medicine Surgery Toxicology
International Conferences 2024-25
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Conferences by Country

USA Australia Italy Germany UK Japan Brazil South Korea Netherlands
Spain Canada China France India Singapore South Africa New Zealand Philippines
Poland Austria Finland Denmark Mexico Norway Romania

Medical & Clinical Conferences

Microbiology Diabetes & Endocrinology Nursing Healthcare Management Neuroscience Immunology Gastroenterology Genetics & MolecularBiology Pathology Alternative Healthcare Pediatrics Ophthalmology
Oncology & Cancer Cardiology Dentistry Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Psychiatry Infectious Diseases Medical Ethics & Health Policies Palliativecare Reproductive Medicine & Women Healthcare Surgery Radiology

Conferences By Subject

Pharmaceutical Sciences Pharma Marketing & Industry Agri, Food & Aqua Nutrition Physics & Materials Science Environmental Science EEE & Engineering Veterinary Chemical Engineering Business Management Massmedia Geology & Earth science
Top