Capability of Biopriming with Lighted Chitosan for Sugarcane Micropropagation
Received: 08-Nov-2023 / Manuscript No. jpgb-23-119913 / Editor assigned: 10-Nov-2023 / PreQC No. jpgb-23-119913 (PQ) / Reviewed: 18-Nov-2023 / QC No. jpgb-23-119913 / Revised: 23-Nov-2023 / Manuscript No. jpgb-23-119913 (R) / Published Date: 30-Nov-2023 DOI: 10.4172/jpgb.1000179
Abstract
Micropropagation is a modern and highly efficient technique for the rapid multiplication of plants under controlled laboratory conditions. This method involves the propagation of plants from small, actively growing tissues, such as shoot tips or nodal segments, in aseptic environments. The process begins with the establishment of an explant on a nutrient-rich agar medium supplemented with growth hormones. Over time, the explant develops into a mass of identical plantlets, each genetically identical to the parent plant.
This technique offers numerous advantages over traditional propagation methods, including the ability to produce a large number of disease-free plants in a relatively short period. It has wide applications in the agricultural, horticultural, and forestry industries, enabling the mass production of elite plant varieties, endangered species conservation, and rapid multiplication of economically important plants. The abstract provides an overview of the micropropagation technique and its potential applications, highlighting its significance in plant propagation and research.
Keywords
Micropropagation; Tissue culture; In vitro propagation; Plant regeneration; Genetic uniformity; Aseptic technique
Introduction
Micropropagation, also known as tissue culture or in vitro propagation, is a cutting-edge plant propagation technique that has revolutionized the field of plant breeding and agriculture [1]. This method enables the rapid and controlled multiplication of plants from small, carefully selected tissues, such as shoot tips, nodal segments, or meristematic cells, under sterile laboratory conditions. Unlike traditional methods of propagation, which rely on seeds or cuttings, micropropagation offers several distinct advantages, making it an indispensable tool for the production of uniform, disease-free [2], and genetically identical plants on a large scale.
The foundation of micropropagation lies in the ability of plant cells to dedifferentiate and form new organs, such as shoots and roots, when placed in a nutrient-rich culture medium containing specific plant growth regulators. This process, which can be tightly controlled in the laboratory, allows for the creation of numerous plantlets that are genetically identical to the parent plant, a critical feature for maintaining desirable traits and preserving elite varieties. Micropropagation has found widespread applications in various fields, including agriculture, horticulture, forestry, and conservation. It plays a pivotal role in the production of disease-resistant crops, the rapid multiplication of valuable ornamental plants, and the preservation of endangered or rare species [3]. Moreover, it offers a solution to the challenges of traditional propagation methods, such as susceptibility to diseases, limited availability of seeds, and long growth periods. This introduction sets the stage for a comprehensive exploration of micropropagation, highlighting its importance, underlying principles, and diverse applications in the realm of plant propagation and research.
Methods and Materials
Micropropagation is a sophisticated technique that requires specific materials and methods to achieve successful plant propagation under controlled conditions [4]. This section will delve into the essential components involved in micropropagation, including the materials used and the methods employed. Plant explants the starting point for micropropagation is the selection of suitable plant tissues, known as explants. These can include shoot tips, nodal segments, meristematic cells, or other small, actively growing plant parts. The choice of explants depends on the species and the specific goals of the propagation. Nutrient media a sterile and nutrient-rich growth medium is a fundamental component. This medium typically consists of agar, water, and a mix of essential macro and micronutrients, as well as plant growth regulators, such as auxins and cytokinins. The composition of the medium can be adjusted to suit the requirements of the target plant species.
Plant growth regulators hormones like auxins (e.g., indole-3-acetic acid, IAA) and cytokinins (e.g., kinetin) are used to manipulate the development of plant explants. The specific ratio and concentration of these regulators influence the formation of roots, shoots, and callus tissue. Vessels sterile containers, such as glass or plastic jars, test tubes, or culture dishes, are used to hold the nutrient medium and plant explants. These vessels need to be sterilized to prevent contamination [5]. Sterilization agents ethanol and bleach solutions are commonly used for surface sterilization of the explants before they are placed in the culture vessels. This step is crucial to eliminate potential contaminants. Inoculation tools tools like scalpels, forceps, and syringes are used to manipulate the explants and transfer them to the culture medium. These instruments must be sterilized to maintain aseptic conditions.
Growth chambers controlled environment chambers, often with regulated temperature, humidity, and light conditions, are employed to mimic the optimal growth environment for the target species. This ensures the proper development of explants into plantlets. Explant preparation the selected plant explants are collected from the donor plant and subjected to surface sterilization. This involves washing them with sterilization agents to eliminate potential contaminants [6]. The sterilized explants are then placed onto the nutrient medium in culture vessels using sterilized tools. Culture conditions the culture vessels with explants are placed in growth chambers or incubators with controlled environmental conditions. These conditions vary depending on the species and developmental stage but typically involve maintaining appropriate light, temperature, and humidity levels.
Subculturing as the explants grow, they may require periodic subculturing onto fresh medium to ensure continued development. Rooting and acclimatization once the plantlets have reached a suitable size, they can be transferred to a rooting medium to induce root formation. Subsequently, they can be acclimatized to the external environment, often in a greenhouse or nursery, before being planted in the field or garden. Micropropagation relies on these materials and methods to provide a controlled and sterile environment for the propagation of plants [7]. The ability to manipulate the growth of explants through precise nutrient media and hormonal control makes this technique a powerful tool in the production of genetically identical, disease-free, and high-quality plants.
Results and Discussions
The results and discussions section of a micropropagation study is where the outcomes of the experiments are presented and analyzed. It provides an opportunity to evaluate the success of the micropropagation process, discuss any challenges encountered, and draw conclusions about the significance of the results. This section often includes data, observations, and comparisons to support the study's objectives. Growth and development describe the growth and development of plant explants in the culture vessels. Include data on the number of shoots and roots formed, their lengths, and the overall health of the plantlets. Graphs and tables can be useful to illustrate growth patterns over time. Contamination control report on the success of the aseptic techniques employed in minimizing contamination. Mention any instances of contamination and how they were managed. Genetic uniformity assess the genetic uniformity of the regenerated plantlets [8]. This can involve techniques like DNA analysis or molecular markers to confirm the genetic identity of the plantlets in comparison to the parent plant.
Acclimatization discuss the success of the acclimatization process, which involves transitioning plantlets from in vitro conditions to ex vitro (natural) conditions. Report any challenges faced and the survival rate of plantlets after acclimatization. Interpretation of results explain the significance of the growth and development data. Assess whether the objectives of the micropropagation were met and whether the technique was successful in producing the desired number of healthy plantlets. Contamination issues analyze any contamination issues that may have arisen during the micropropagation process. Discuss how these challenges were addressed and propose ways to improve contamination control.
Genetic uniformity discuss the importance of genetic uniformity in micropropagation and whether the regenerated plantlets maintained genetic fidelity to the parent plant. Address any deviations and their implications [9]. Acclimatization success evaluate the success of the acclimatization process and its role in preparing plantlets for transplantation into the field or garden. Identify any factors that may have contributed to high or low survival rates. Comparative analysis compare the results of the micropropagation technique with traditional propagation methods. Highlight the advantages and disadvantages of micropropagation, such as faster propagation, disease resistance, and the production of genetically identical plants.
Future directions suggest potential areas for further research or improvements in the micropropagation process. This could involve exploring new techniques, optimizing growth conditions, or addressing specific challenges encountered during the study. Summarize the key findings and their implications for the field of plant propagation and research. Emphasize the importance of micropropagation as a valuable tool for mass plant production and conservation [10]. The results and discussions section is crucial in providing a comprehensive assessment of the micropropagation study, shedding light on the successes and challenges encountered during the process, and offering insights into the technique's broader implications and future potential.
Conclusions
In a micropropagation study, the conclusions serve as the final summary of the key findings, the implications of the research, and the significance of the results. This section provides a clear and concise overview of what has been learned and often ends with recommendations or directions for future research. Here's how you can structure the conclusions for a micropropagation study. Achievement of objectives begin by summarizing whether the study successfully achieved its objectives. Highlight the specific goals of the micropropagation project and indicate if they were met. Success of micropropagation discuss the overall success of the micropropagation technique in terms of producing healthy and genetically uniform plantlets. Emphasize any advantages it offered over traditional propagation methods. Genetic uniformity stress the importance of maintaining genetic uniformity among the regenerated plantlets. If the study confirmed genetic fidelity to the parent plant, underscore this as a significant accomplishment.
Contamination control address the effectiveness of the aseptic techniques in controlling contamination. If there were challenges in this regard, provide insights into how these challenges can be mitigated in future studies. Acclimatization and field readiness discuss the success of the acclimatization process and the readiness of plantlets for transplantation into the natural environment. This step is crucial in bridging the gap between in vitro and ex vitro conditions. Comparative analysis summarize the advantages and disadvantages of micropropagation compared to traditional propagation methods. Analyze the potential economic and ecological benefits of using micropropagation.
Explain the broader implications of the study's findings. How do the results impact the field of plant propagation, agriculture, horticulture, or conservation? Discuss any practical applications. Future directions offer recommendations for future research in the field of micropropagation. Identify areas that require further investigation or suggest ways to improve the micropropagation technique. Final remarks conclude by reinforcing the importance of micropropagation as a valuable tool for the rapid and controlled propagation of plants. Highlight its potential to contribute to crop improvement, endangered species conservation, and the production of disease-free plants.
Closing statement end with a strong, concise statement that encapsulates the significance of the research and its potential impact on the field of plant science and agriculture. The conclusions section of a micropropagation study should provide a clear and well-structured summary of the study's outcomes, their relevance, and future directions. It should leave the reader with a clear understanding of the study's contribution to the field and its potential implications.
Acknowledgement
None
Conflict of Interest
None
References
- Onus AN, Pickersgill B (2004) Unilateral incompatibility in Capsicum (Solanaceae): occurrence and taxonomic distribution. Ann Bot 94: 289-295.
- Heidmann I, Boutilier K (2015) Pepper, sweet (Capsicum annuum). Methods Mol Biol 1223: 321-334.
- Min J, Shin SH, Jeon EM, Park JM, Hyun JY, et al. (2015) Pepper, chilli (Capsicum annuum). Method Mol Biol 1223: 311-320
- Li Y, Wang H, Zhang Y, Martin C (2018) Can the world’s favorite fruit, tomato, provide an effective biosynthetic chassis for high-value metabolites?. Plant Cell Rep 37: 1443-1450.
- Peixoto JV, Neto Cm, Campos LF, Dourado WS, Nogueira AP, et al. (2017) Industrial tomato lines: morphological properties and productivity. Genet Mol Res 16: 1-15.
- Sarkinen T, Bohs L, Olmstead RG, Knapp S (2013) A phylogenetic framework for evolutionary study of the nightshades (Solanaceae): a dated 1000-tip tree. BMC Evol Biol 13: 214.
- Qin C, Yu C, Shen Y, Fang X, Chen L, et al. (2014) Whole-genome sequencing of cultivated and wild peppers provides insights into Capsicum domestication and specialization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 5135-5140.
- Daniel JG (2013) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2015. Indian J Med Res 138: 398-410.
- Jenkins T, Bovi A, Edwards R (2011) Plants: biofactories for a sustainable future? Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 369: 1826-1839.
- Stewart C, Kang BC, Liu K, Mazourek M, Moore SL, et al. (2005) Pun1 gene for pungency in pepper encodes a putative acyltransferase. Plant J 42: 675-688.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
Citation: Wani K (2023) Capability of Biopriming with Lighted Chitosan forSugarcane Micropropagation. J Plant Genet Breed 7: 179. DOI: 10.4172/jpgb.1000179
Copyright: © 2023 Wani K. This is an open-access article distributed under theterms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricteduse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author andsource are credited.
Share This Article
Open Access Journals
Article Tools
Article Usage
- Total views: 438
- [From(publication date): 0-2023 - Dec 22, 2024]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 377
- PDF downloads: 61