Cancer Surgery
Open Access

Histologically, there are two types of lung cancer: small cell and non-small cell. Cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, and systemic symptoms like anorexia and weight loss are the most common signs of lung cancer. Chest radiography should be performed on high-risk patients who present with symptoms. Computed tomography and possibly positron emission tomography should be used if no likely alternative diagnosis is found. A diagnostic evaluation is necessary if there is a high suspicion of lung cancer. There are three simultaneous steps in the diagnostic evaluation—tissue diagnosis, staging, and functional evaluation—all of which have an impact on treatment planning and prognosis. It is best to employ the least invasive technique possible. A team of specialists, including a pulmonologist, a medical oncologist, a radiation oncologist, a pathologist, a radiologist, and a thoracic surgeon, are needed to diagnose and treat a patient with lung cancer. New targeted molecular therapies can be used to treat non-small cell lung cancer if various mutations are found in the samples. To ensure that the patient's values and wishes are taken into account and, if necessary, to coordinate end-of-life care, the family physician should remain involved in the patient's care. Quality of life is improved and survival may be prolonged by early palliative care. At each visit, family physicians should focus on early detection of lung cancer and encourage smoking cessation as a means of prevention. In high-risk patients, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography. The American Academy of Family Physicians, on the other hand, comes to the conclusion that there is insufficient evidence to recommend screening or not. The physician and the patient should jointly decide whether to screen high-risk patients.

Treatment options

In the United States of America (USA), lung cancer is the leading cause of death for both men and women. It is a cancer that spreads quickly, is highly invasive, and is prevalent. Lung cancer was predicted to cause 224,210 new cases and 159,260 deaths in the United States in 2014. In the United States, it kills more people than the next four most common types of cancer-prostate, breast, colon, and stomach— all put together. Having smoked for at least 20 years is consistently linked to its incidence and mortality patterns. Competitive gene– enzyme interactions that influence the activation or detoxification of procarcinogens, levels of DNA adduct formation, and the integrity of endogenous mechanisms for repairing DNA lesions may determine individual susceptibility to tobacco-induced lung cancer. Because lung cancer is so diverse and can develop at a variety of locations in the bronchial tree, its symptoms and signs can vary greatly depending on where it is located anatomically70% of lung cancer patients have advanced disease (stage III or IV) at diagnosis [1].

Squamous cell lung cancers (SQCLC) typically begin in the main bronchi and spread to the carina, accounting for between 25% and 30% of all lung cancers. Tumors that develop in the peripheral bronchi are called adenocarcinomas (AdenoCA), and they make up about 40% of all lung cancers. Lobar atelectasis and pneumonitis are produced by adenoCAs as they grow.Bronchioloalveolar cancers (BAC), which have been renamed adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), start in the alveoli and spread through the connections between them [2]. Patients with AIS and MIA have a very high 5-year rate of disease-free survival following complete resection. The most dedifferentiated type of lung cancer, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), typically develops in the mediastinum centralism. SCLC originates from the hormonal cells of the lung. SCLCs account for between 10 and 15 percent of all lung cancers. They are extremely aggressive, rapidly spreading to sub mucosal lymphatic vessels and regional lymph nodes, and almost never causing an invasion of the bronchi. Large cell anaplastic carcinomas (LCAC), also known as NSCLC not otherwise specified (NOS), tend to invade the mediastinum and its structures earlier locally and are located more proximally. About 10% of all NSCLC is caused by NSCLC-NOS and exhibits characteristics comparable to those of small cell cancer, including a rapid and fatal spread [3]. The superior sulcus is where pan coast cancer begins, and it spreads by local invasion into juxta-opposed structures. All cellular breakdown in the lungs types can become multifocal in the curve they emerge in (T3), or spread into the lung of beginning (T4), or spread to the contralateral lung (M1) (Figure 1) [3]. Invariably, advanced lymph node involvement is associated with the compression of mediastina structures, which can result in esophageal compression and difficulty swallowing, venous compression and congestion caused by collateral circulation, or tracheal compression. Before there is any knowledge of a primary lung lesion, signs of metastatic disease that involve distant sites like the liver, brain, or bone are seen [4].

The regulatory circuits that control normal cell proliferation and homeostasis are defective in lung cancer cells. It is thought that a series of genetic and epigenetic changes lead to the progression from a normal to malignant phenotype in lung cancer, eventually leading to invasive cancer through clonal expansion.The processes of invasion, metastasis, and resistance to cancer therapy are influenced by the continued accumulation of genetic and epigenetic abnormalities acquired during clonal expansion following the development of the primary cancer. In order to improve disease prevention, early detection, and treatment, it is crucial to identify and characterize these molecular changes. The personalized prognosis and ideal treatment selection for each patient will be significantly improved with knowledge of a patient's tumor characteristics and genetics [5,6].

An emerging hallmark of cancer is the tumor's microenvironment, which includes the intricate interactions of its various cell types and released signaling molecules .Stem cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, stromal cells, and an extensive collection of immune cells recruited into tumors make up this group. The growth microenvironment is modified to stifle have safe reactions, cultivate growth development, and assist disease cells with avoiding resistant reconnaissance .Natural killer (NK) cells, tumor-associated macrophages (TAM), dendritic cell (DC) subsets, cytotoxic and regulatory T-cells (CTLs and Tregs), and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are among the immune cells that are associated with tumors. In some cancers, the amount of various immune cell subsets present in the tumor microenvironment can be used as a predictor of treatment success and survival [7]. The active secretion of a number of growth factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), as well as the loss of antigen variants establish the altered tumor microenvironment created by cancer cells. Myeloid cells such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), macrophages, and dendritic cells (DC) can act as regulatory cells in the tumor microenvironment [8]. The immune cells that are present in the tumor microenvironment are impaired in function, and the newly infiltrating immune cells become alternatively activated, resulting in a perturbed phenotype. By increasing levels of NO synthase and arginase-1, inhibiting T-cell proliferation and activation releasing IL-10, and overproducing reactive oxygen species (ROS] [55], MDSCs produce their pro-tumor effects. In comparison to healthy controls, advanced stage NSCLC patients' peripheral blood contained higher levels of MSDC and lower levels of CD8+ T cells [9].

The pro-tumor M2-phenotype, which accumulates in the tumor stroma and is associated with decreased OS and poor patient outcome, is more prevalent in tumor-associated macrophages (TAM). The ability of these alternatively activated macrophages to appropriately co-stimulate T-cells and present antigen is impaired. In contrast, macrophages with the M1 phenotype accumulate intratumorally and express HLA-DR, iNOS, and TNF-, all of which have antitumor properties. Additionally, a higher intratumoral density of CD68+ macrophages is associated with improved NSCLC survival[10,11].

At the interface of the innate and adaptive immune systems, DCs are the most significant antigen-presenting cells [12]. DCs, on the other hand, are frequently in an immature state in the tumor microenvironment and are unable to effectively prime T-cells because they lack the ability to present antigen and have low expression levels of co-stimulatory molecules like CD80 and CD86. In NSCLC, peripheral blood lymphocytes can also be used as a predictor: 1) A lower hazard ratio for death was found to be associated with a higher lymphocyte count in the total blood count 2) a neutrophil to lymphocyte proportion (NLR) >3.81 was recognized in similar concentrate as an indicator of endurance in patients with Stage I NSCLC;3) Treg cells were also found to be higher in NSCLC patients' peripheral blood than in healthy controls [13].

References

1. Stroup D F,  Berlin J A,  Morton S C, Olkin I, Williamson G D, et al. (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Jama283:2008-2012.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Nicole S, Sheila S, Mohit B (2009) Methodological issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies in orthopaedic research. JBJS 3: 87-94.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Andreas S (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25: 603-605.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. James J B, Michael J R, William J M, Weidong K (2011) Association between time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama305: 2335-2342.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Poggio F, Bruzzone  M, Ceppi M, Ponde N F, Valle G et al. (2018) Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 29: 1497-1508.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Frank S H, Vanna C S, Gonzalez R, Jacques G, Piotr R, et al. (2018) Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol19: 1480-1492.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Jacob S, Antoni R, Georgina V L, Ana A, Jacques G, et al. (2017) Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006). Lancet390: 1853-1862.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Jedd D W, Vanna C, Rene G, Piotr R, Jacques G, et al. (2017) Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. NEngl J Med377: 1345-1356.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Edward B G, Naiyer A R, Rina H, Natasha L, Balmanoukian A S, et al. (2015) Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. NEngl J Med372: 2018-2028.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Roy S H, Paul B, Wan K, Enriqueta F, Gracia J P, et al. (2016) Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet387:1540-1550.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

11. Hussein A T, Peter A F, Alain A, Omid H, Stephen H, et al. (2018) Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in melanoma metastatic to the brain. NEngl J Med379: 722-730.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

12. Sarah B G, Scott N G, Amit M, Anne C C, Roy S H, et al. (2016) Pembrolizumab for patients with melanoma or non-small-cell lung cancer and untreated brain metastases: early analysis of a non-randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol17: 976-983.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

13. Georgina V L, Victoria A, Serigne L, Shahneen S, Alexander D G, et al. (2018) Combination nivolumab and ipilimumab or nivolumab alone in melanoma brain metastases: a multicentre randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol19: 672-681.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref