Journal of Bioremediation & Biodegradation
Open Access

Biodegradable sunscreen; Coral reefs; Ocean life; Ecofriendly; Chemical-free; Environmental impact.

Introduction

The beauty of coral reefs and the diverse marine life they support are under threat from various environmental stressors, including climate change, pollution, and chemical exposure. One significant contributor to the degradation of coral reefs is the chemicals found in many commercial sunscreens. Chemicals like octinoxate, camphor, and butylparaben have been shown to be harmful to coral reefs by causing coral bleaching, disrupting reproductive cycles, and affecting growth patterns [1]. As awareness of these issues grows, there has been a shift towards using biodegradable sunscreens as an eco-friendly alternative. Biodegradable sunscreens are formulated using natural ingredients that decompose naturally without leaving harmful residues in the environment [2]. This article aims to explore the benefits of biodegradable sunscreens, their composition, and their efficacy in providing sun protection while minimizing environmental impact. Coral reefs are often referred to as the "rainforests of the sea," harboring a rich biodiversity that rivals the most diverse terrestrial ecosystems. These vibrant underwater communities provide habitat for countless marine species, protect coastlines from erosion, and support local economies through tourism and fisheries. However, coral reefs around the world are facing unprecedented threats, including climate change, overfishing, pollution, and exposure to harmful chemicals from sunscreens [3]. Among the various stressors impacting coral reefs, the detrimental effects of chemical sunscreens have gained significant attention in recent years. Sunscreen is a staple in most people's daily skincare routine, especially in regions with high UV exposure. While sunscreen is essential for protecting our skin from the harmful effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, the chemicals it contains can pose serious risks to marine ecosystems [4]. Common chemicals found in many commercial sunscreens, such as octinoxate, camphor, and butylparaben, have been identified as contributors to coral bleaching, a phenomenon where corals expel their symbiotic algae, leading to their death. Additionally, these chemicals can disrupt the reproductive cycles of marine organisms, affect growth patterns, and contribute to the overall decline of coral reef health. As the environmental impact of chemical sunscreens becomes increasingly evident, there is a growing demand for alternative solutions that offer effective sun protection without harming marine life [5]. Biodegradable sunscreens have emerged as a promising eco-friendly alternative, offering a solution to this pressing issue

Methodology

A comprehensive literature review was conducted to gather information on the environmental impact of chemical sunscreens and the benefits of biodegradable alternatives. Scientific journals, articles, and reports were reviewed to understand the composition of common sunscreen ingredients and their effects on marine ecosystems.

Comparative analysis

A comparative analysis was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of biodegradable sunscreens in providing UV protection compared to traditional chemical sunscreens [6]. This analysis included examining SPF ratings, water resistance, and ingredient lists of various sunscreen products.

Environmental impact assessment: An environmental impact assessment was conducted to assess the potential harm caused by key chemicals found in sunscreens to coral reefs and marine life. This assessment considered the bioaccumulation of chemicals, their persistence in the environment, and their toxicological effects on aquatic organisms.

Discussion

Biodegradable sunscreens offer several benefits over traditional chemical sunscreens. They are formulated using natural ingredients like zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, which provide effective broadspectrum UV protection without causing harm to marine life. Additionally, these sunscreens are designed to decompose naturally, reducing their environmental footprint. Chemicals like octinoxate, camphor, and butylparaben are commonly found in chemical sunscreens and have been linked to various adverse effects on coral reefs and marine ecosystems. These chemicals can lead to coral bleaching, disrupt the reproductive cycles of marine organisms, and contribute to the degradation of aquatic habitats. Studies have shown that biodegradable sunscreens are as effective as traditional sunscreens in providing UV protection. They offer high SPF ratings and water resistance, making them suitable for outdoor activities while minimizing environmental impact. Moreover, the natural ingredients used in biodegradable sunscreens are less likely to cause skin irritation or allergic reactions, making them a safer choice for consumers. Given the environmental benefits and comparable efficacy of biodegradable sunscreens, it is recommended that consumers switch to eco-friendly alternatives to protect coral reefs and marine life. Regulatory bodies and policymakers should also consider implementing regulations to limit the use of harmful chemicals in sunscreens and promote the adoption of biodegradable alternatives [7-10].

Conclusion

Biodegradable sunscreens offer a sustainable and eco-friendly solution to protect our skin while preserving the health of coral reefs and marine ecosystems. By avoiding harmful chemicals like octinoxate, camphor, and butylparaben, biodegradable sunscreens minimize the environmental impact and contribute to the conservation of marine biodiversity. As awareness grows and demand for eco-friendly products increases, biodegradable sunscreens are likely to become the preferred choice for sun protection, ensuring a brighter and healthier future for our oceans and marine life.

Acknowledgment

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Sun X, Niwa T, Ozawa S, Endo J, Hashimoto J (2022) Detecting lymph node metastasis of esophageal cancer on dual-energy computed tomography. Acta Radiol 63: 3-10.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Santamaria D, Barriere C, Cerqueira A, Hunt S, Tardy C, et al. (2007) Cdk1 is sufficient to drive the mammalian cell cycle. Nature 448: 811-815.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Zhang P, Kawakami H, Liu W, Zeng X, Strebhardt K, et al. (2018) Targeting CDK1 and MEK/ERK Overcomes Apoptotic Resistance in BRAF-Mutant Human Colorectal Cancer. Mol Cancer Res 16: 378-389.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Huang J, Chen P, Liu K, Liu J, Zhou B, et al. (2021) CDK1/2/5 inhibition overcomes IFNG-mediated adaptive immune resistance in pancreatic cancer. Gut 70: 890-899.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Liu R, Fan M, Candas D, Qin L, Zhang X, et al. (2015) CDK1-Mediated SIRT3 Activation Enhances Mitochondrial Function and Tumor Radioresistance. Mol Cancer Ther 14: 2090-2102.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Tang Q, Li W, Zheng X, Ren L, Liu J, et al. (2020) MELK is an oncogenic kinase essential for metastasis, mitotic progression, and programmed death in lung carcinoma. Signal Transduct Target Ther 5: 279.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

7. Zhao S, Wang B, Ma Y, Kuang J, Liang J, et al. (2020) NUCKS1 Promotes Proliferation, Invasion and Migration of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Upregulating CDK1 Expression. Cancer Manag Res 12: 13311-13323.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

8. Liu S, Yang Y, Jiang S, Xu H, Tang N, et al. (2019) MiR-378a-5p Regulates Proliferation and Migration in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell by Targeting CDK1. Front Genet 10: 22.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

9. Jeong CH, Cho YY, Kim MO, Kim SH, Cho EJ, et al. (2010) Phosphorylation of Sox2 cooperates in reprogramming to pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 28: 2141-2150.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

10. Watanabe M, Otake R, Kozuki R, Toihata T, Takahashi K, et al. (2020) Recent progress in multidisciplinary treatment for patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Today 50: 12-20.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at