Biopolymers Research
Open Access

Acrylic polymers; Biodegradation rates; Biodegradative pathways; C-C backbone recalcitrance; Environmental fates

Introduction

Free radical ring-opening copolymerization of tert-butyl acrylate and 2-methylene-1,3-dioxepane in acidic conditions was followed by tert-butyl de-protection to create degradable poly(acrylic acid). The resulting biodegradable poly (acrylic acid) counterpart has ester groups inside the backbone, allowing for environmental hydrolysis into short chain oligomers that may then be biodegraded. When compared to a conventional non-degradable all carbon backbone version, the disclosed degradable poly (acrylic acid) demonstrates a significant degree of biodegradability (27.50% in 28 days) under environmental conditions.

Acrylic polymers (AP) are a complex class of substances with numerous uses, frequent occurrences, and rising demand. Polyacrylamide, polyacrylic acid, polymethyl methacrylates, and polyacrylonitrile are some of the most popular AP. The most often used AP has data of roughly 9 MT/year, which gives an estimate of the quantity of trash that can be produced after goods’ lifecycles even though information for the creation of all AP types is not provided. An AP product’s fate when its lifecycle is complete will depend on its chemical composition, the environment in which it was used, and the laws in place in each country regarding the disposal of plastic trash. Although recycling is the greatest option for plastic polymer wastes, the majority of AP cannot be recycled and end up in landfills. The need to establish legislation and create technology solutions for managing plastic trash is crucial given the environmental catastrophe in which the world is currently mired. In this sense, biotechnology methods that incorporate microbial activity can be appealing eco-friendly tactics. The wide range of AP variety, their characteristics and applications, and the variables influencing their biodegradability are discussed in this mini-review, which emphasises the significance of standardising biodegradation quantification approaches. We also outline the enzymes and metabolic routes used by microorganisms to attack the AP chemical structure and provide some predictions about the biochemical processes that may be involved in the biodegradation of quaternary carbon-containing AP.

Finally, we discuss methods for improving AP biodegradability and emphasise the need for additional research on AP biodegradation as well as stronger legislation for AP usage and waste management [1-5].

Drug distribution that is regulated and precise has been made possible by biodegradable polymers. Due to its advantageous qualities, polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) is one of the synthetic biodegradable polymers that have been the subject of substantial research. Due to its stimuli-sensitive behaviour, it is often referred to as a “Smart Polymer.” For the treatment or identification of a variety of diseases and disorders, a wide range of PLGA-based drug delivery devices have been reported. An overview of the chemistry, physical chemical characteristics, biodegradation behaviour, evaluation criteria, and applications of PLGA in drug delivery are given in the current review. We list and discuss many drug-polymer pairings that have been used to create drug delivery or carrier systems.

In controlled compost, the biodegradabilities of polymers and their composites were reported. As biodegradable polymers, polycaprolactone (PCL) and poly (lactic acid) (PLA) were used. In accordance with ISO 14855-2, the biodegradability of PCL and PLA samples in controlled compost was assessed using a Microbial Oxidative Degradation Analyzer (MODA). Also described was the sample preparation procedure for the ISO/DIS 10210 biodegradation test. The effects of sample sizes and shapes on biodegradability were investigated. The ISO 14855-2 biodegradation test’s reproducibility by MODA was confirmed. The ISO/DIS 10210 sample preparation procedure for polymer pellets, polymer film, and polymer products was shown to be valid for use with ISO 14855-2.

Discussion

Plastics have been widely used in many fields since the development of fully synthetic plastic in the 1900s, and they now account for a sizeable market because of their favourable qualities. Although most plastics are not biodegradable, this has led to an increase in plastic trash that is hazardous to both the environment and living things. As a result, standard test procedures have been devised to gauge the biodegradability of polymers, and biodegradable polymers have arisen as environmentally benign alternatives to non-biodegradable polymers. Sensors that allow for real-time biodegradability monitoring have been developed as a result of technological innovation and the shortcomings of traditional test methodologies. Biodegradable polymers have also been used to create sensors with a variety of functions. In light of this, the current work is the first to contrast and compare sensors that can recognise biodegradable polymers. A cutting-edge method for tracking biodegradability in real time is the detection using sensors. Additionally, biodegradable polymer-based sensors are there, and these sensors come in a variety of kinds and use cases. In order to enhance future research, the difficulties in creating these sensors are finally described [6-10].

Conclusion

The variety of AP materials is comparable to their wide-ranging and expanding applications in numerous fields. Since AP materials were thought to be safe for the environment and human health, many nations did not enact laws governing their usage and waste disposal. Despite this, laws for AP usage and waste management should be set in light of the existing knowledge on the impact AP releases generate the harms that might be expected by their accumulation in the environment, as well as the toxicity of some of their components. It would be possible to create better waste management strategies if there were thorough and in-depth evaluations of the potential environmental fates that AP could have after their lifecycles.

On some types of polymers and to some extent, AP microbial biodegradation is possible. The structure of the polymer, the microorganisms and environment where the process takes place, and the techniques employed to quantify AP degradation will all have an impact on an AP biodegradability evaluation, which determines the biodegradation rate a polymer experiences. The biodegradability assessment, which is essential in determining the scope of AP’s environmental impact, is greatly impacted by the C-C backbone, the presence of side groups, quaternary carbons, and contaminants in AP products. In order to provide comparable data and establish precise biodegradation rates, it would be advantageous to standardise the methods used to measure biodegradation. The more objective method is to use isotopic C-labeled AP materials to quantify transformation to CO2, biomass, or intermediate biodegradation products. Long-term experiments are necessary because short-term experiments measure the more quickly eliminated groups, which leads to overestimation of degradation rates because the most recalcitrant segment, the C-C backbone cleavage, is not quantified. This leads to false expectations about how long an AP would take to degrade.

1. Kripke ML (1981) Immunologic mechanisms in UV radiation carcinogenesis. Adv Cancer Res 34: 69-106.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

2. Homburger F, Russfield AB, Weisburger JH, Lim S, Chak SP, et al. (1975) Aging changes in CD-1 HaM/ICR mice reared under standard laboratory conditions. J Natl Cancer Inst 55(1): 37-45

Indexed at, Google Scholar

3. Boutwell Rk (1964) Some biological aspects of skin carcinogenisis. Prog Exp Tumor Res 4: 207-250.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

4. Digiovanni J, Slaga TJ, Boutwell RK (1980) Comparison of the tumor-initiating activity of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene and benzo[a]pyrene in female SENCAR and CS-1 mice. Carcinogenesis. 1(5): 381-389.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

5. Markham RV, Jr Sutherland JC, Mardiney MR (1973) The ubiquitous occurrence of immune complex localization in the renal glomeruli of normal mice. Lab Invest 29(1): 111-120.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

6. Ward JM, Argilan F, Reynolds CW (1983) Immunoperoxidase localization of large granular lymphocytes in normal tissues and lesions of athymic nude rats. J Immunol 131(1): 132-139.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

7. Ward JM, Singh G, Katyal SL, Anderson LM, Kovatch RM (1985) Immunocytochemical localization of the surfactant apoprotein and Clara cell antigen in chemically induced and naturally occurring pulmonary neoplasms of mice. Am J Pathol 118(3): 493-499.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

8. Percy DH, Jonas AM (1971) Incidence of spontaneous tumors in CD (R) -1 HaM-ICR mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 46(5): 1045-1065.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

9. Andrews BS, Eisenberg RA, Theofilopoulos AN, Izui S, Wilson CB, et al. (1978) Spontaneous murine lupus-like syndromes. Clinical and immunopathological manifestations in several strains. J Exp Med 148(5): 1198-1215.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

10. Slaga TJ (1983) Overview of tumor promotion in animals. Environ Health Perspect 50: 3–14.

Indexed at, Google Scholar