Bacterial Contamination of Indoor Air in Schools of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Biology Department, Princess Norah Bent Abdul Rahman University, Scientific Section, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author:

Dr. Samiah HS Al-Mijalli
Biology Department, Princess Norah Bent Abdul Rahman University
Scientific Section, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Tel: +00966555200510
E-mail: dr.samiah10@hotmail.com

Received date: October 30, 2016; Accepted date: November 03, 2016; Published date: November 10, 2016

Citation:Al-Mijalli SHS (2016) Bacterial Contamination of Indoor Air in Schools of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Air Water Borne Dis 5:131. doi: 10.4172/2167-7719.1000131

Copyright: © 2016 Al-Mijalli SHS. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Air & Water Borne Diseases

Abstract

Background: The presence of bacteria in the indoor air pose a serious problem from the point of view of health protection and environmental engineering. Precise determination of various groups of bacteria indoors is necessary for both to estimate the health hazard and to create standards for indoor air quality control. This is especially important in such densely populated facilities like educational institutions. Results: In the present study, 252 samples of indoor air and air conditioners of 25 schools (Middle Schools) Public and Special, those were collected from east and centre of Riyadh in, Saudi Arabia, between October and November 2015. The most common bacterial isolates were, Gram negative bacteria (Pseudomonas stutzeri, Francisella tularensis and Ralstonia mannitolilytica ) of the total airborne bacteria. Whereas, the prevailing Gram positive bacteria were the Staphylococcus aureus, followed by Kocuria kristinae. Also, Pseudomonas stutzeri was isolated from the air conditioners of special schools. Results revealed that the highest level of bacterial contamination was detected in the class rooms during lessons. Conclusions: High concentrations of bacteria was observed in the public schools (where overcrowded classrooms). Results obtained in this study showed that the bacterial species varied in their susceptibility to all the antimicrobials used. Majority of them showed resistance to one or more of antimicrobials compounds. It was observed that Ciprofloxacin was the most effective antibiotic to all bacterial species used during this study.

Keywords

Bacterial; Contamination; Air; School; Antibiotic susceptibility

Introduction

Millions of children and adults across the nation spend their days in school buildings, and they need safe, healthy environments to thrive, learn, and succeed [1]. Indoor air quality has become an important public health concern as most people spend more than 90% of their time in indoors like houses, offices and schools [2]. Air in the indoor environment can be polluted by a number of pollutants among which airborne microorganism (bacteria and fungi) are one of the most important. It has been estimated that one-third of indoor air quality (IAQ) complaints may be due to microbial contamination [3] and exposure to these may cause allergies, respiratory and immunotoxic diseases [4]. Several investigators have reported these contaminants in different indoor environments such as schools and hospitals [5-8]. Schools are public places inhabited by thousands of students every day and tend to have high levels of activity that typically result in higher levels of airborne fungi and bacteria [6]. Biological contamination of indoor air is mostly caused by bacteria, moulds and yeast. They can be dangerous as pathogenic living cells but they can also secrete some substances harmful for health [9]. These are different kinds of toxic metabolism products, for example mycotoxins [10-12]. The amount of the microbial content of indoor air of school is an important parameter because it has a direct impact on the mental heal [13], physical development and performance of the students. Epidemiological studies show that too high concentration of microorganisms in the air can be allergenic; however, sometimes even very low concentrations of some particular microorganisms can cause serious diseases [14]. Childhood asthma is one of the commonest chronic respiratory disorders in Asian countries [15-18] also noted that allergic disease (nasal allergy, asthma, and other allergies) is the number one chronic childhood illness. The conditioning systems are to provide occupants with a more comfortable environment. Nevertheless, such artificial environments may be favorable to fungi, bacteria, protozoan and mites growth, which may bring health risks to users, either by hypersensitivity or infections [19-22]. According to the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHARAE, 2000), the health effects caused by microorganisms that are in indoor environments with air conditioning systems can be infective or immunological. Diriba L et al. [23] revealed that Lack of cleaning and checking out of the heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems (HVAC) may allow microbial growth, which causes rhinitis, bronchitis, pharyngitis, pneumonia, conjunctivitis and keratitis in the users. Several studies have occurred on antibiotic susceptibility of indoor airborne bacteria isolated from selected places have done by [24,25] and others.

The objective of the present study is qualitative determination of airborne and air conditioner bacterial contamination at school classrooms of different indoor schools at Riyadh and to study the effect of several antibiotics on the cultures of isolated bacterial species.

Materials and Methods

Samples Collection: 252 samples of 25 schools (Middle Schools)* Public and Special, that were collected from east and centre of Riyadh in, Saudi Arabia between October and November 2015 (Table 1). Collecting of the samples was conducted in the autumn during this season, the percentage of moisture environmental content was relatively between 21% and 36% during October and November and the temperature degree was relatively between (41°C- 15.4°C). The minimum temperature degrees were (20.9°C - 15.4°C) and the maximum were (28.1°C - 21.4°C). During the collection, the air sampler remained about one meter above floor level. Cotton swabs were used for collecting of Air conditioners samples. The Cultural media, that were studied for isolation and identification of bacteria, isolated from schools air and air-conditioners samples were, nutrient agar, sheep blood agar, MacConkey agar, Mueller Hinton agar. In each Class were opened two plates (1 BA and 1 NA) for 10 min and, swab was taken from the filters of each air-conditioner and streaked onto the surface of (BA and NA) media. The samples were incubated at 37°C for overnight. Then saved in the refrigerator to complete the bacterial identification and to examine the antibiotics sensitivity of the bacterial isolates. (Table 2) After the incubation period at 37°C for overnight, the cultural plates were checked for bacterial growth. It was observed that the colonies on Nutrient Agar plates were fewer and rare in the opposite of Blood Agar that was heavy. Representative colonies were purified in 79 plates on Sheep blood agar and MacConkeyagar and incubated at 37°C for overnight. Samples were identified, and analyzed by using microscan Virtek 2 – Compact “Biomerieux”, the antibiotic resistance rates were measured by (AST-P580 and AST-GN75) but some samples were measured by traditional way (Disk methods) in Mueller Hinton agar [26].

Table 1: Kind of schools and numbers of bacterial isolated samples.

Table 1a: Suspension turbidities used for card inoculation.

Table 2: Most common disease in schools between teachers and students.

Microbial identification

Objective: The VITEK 2 is an automated microbial identification system that provides highly accurate and reproducible results (VITEK 2) (Figure 1).

Figure 1: VITEK 2 compact instrument and workstation.

Reagent cards: The reagent cards have 64 wells that can each contain an individual test substrate. Substrates measure various metabolic activities such as acidification, alkalinization, enzyme hydrolysis, and growth in the presence of inhibitory substances. An optically clear film present on both sides of the card allows for the appropriate level of oxygen transmission while maintaining a sealed vesselthat prevents contact with the organism-substrate admixtures. Each card has a preinserted transfer tube used for inoculation. Cards have bar codes that contain information on product type, lot number, expiration date, and a unique identifier that can be linked to the sample either before or after loading the card onto the system. Figure 2 shows the GN card (VITEK 2).

Figure 2: VITEK 2 GN colorimetric identification card.

There are currently four reagent cards available for the identification of different organism classes as follows:

1. GN - Gram-negative fermenting and non-fermenting bacilli

2. GP - Gram-positive cocci and non-spore-forming bacilli

3. YST - Yeasts and yeast-like organisms

4. BCL - Gram-positive spore-forming bacilli

Culture requirements: The on-line product information contains a culture requirements table that lists parameters for appropriate culture and inoculum preparation. These parameters include acceptable culture media, culture age, incubation conditions, and inoculum turbidity (VITEK 2).

Suspension preparation: A sterile swab or applicator stick is used to transfer a sufficient number of colonies of a pure culture and to suspend the microorganism in 3.0 mL of sterile saline (aqueous 0.45% to 0.50% NaCl, pH 4.5 to 7.0) in a 12 × 75 mm clear plastic (polystyrene) test tube. The turbidity is adjusted accordingly (Table 1) and measured using a turbidity meter called the DensiChekTM (VITEK 2) (Table 1a).

Inoculation: Identification cards are inoculated with microorganism suspensions using an integrated vacuum apparatus. A test tube containing the microorganism suspension is placed into a special rack (cassette) and the identification card is placed in the neighbouring slot while inserting the transfer tube into the corresponding suspension tube. The cassette can accommodate up to 10 tests (VITEK 2 Compact) (Figure 3). The filled cassette is placed manually (VITEK 2 compact) into a vacuum chamber station. After the vacuum is applied and air is re-introduced into the station, the organism suspension is forced through the transfer tube into micro-channels that fill all the test wells (VITEK 2).

Incubation: The carousel incubator can accommodate up to 30 or up to 60 cards. All card types are incubated on-line at 35.5 + 1.0°C. Each card is removed from the carousel incubator once every 15 minutes, transported to the optical system for reaction readings, and then returned to the incubator until the next read time. Data are collected at 15-minute intervals during the entire incubation period (VITEK 2).

Using the Biomérieux Vitek^® 2 system automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems (Figures 3 and 4)

Figure 3: VITEK 2 compact cassette loaded with 10 cards and suspension tubes and bar code scanner for data entry.

Figure 4: VITEK 2 cassette loaded with cards and suspension tubes being loaded into the automatic transport system.

Optical system: A transmittance optical system allows interpretation of test reactions using different wavelengths in the visible spectrum. During incubation, each test reaction is read every 15 minutes to measure either turbidity or colored products of substrate metabolism. In addition, a special algorithm is used to eliminate false readings due to small bubbles that may be present.

Antimicrobial screen: We have used a range of ESBL, Ampicillin, Ampicillin/Sulbactam, Piperacillin, Cefazolin, Cefoxitin Cefazidime, Ceftriaxone, Cefepim, Ertapenem, Meropenem, Amikacin, Gentamicin, Tobramycin, Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, Nitrofurantoin, Trimethoprin/Sulfamethoxazole, Cefoxitin, Benzylpenicillin, +Amoxicillin, +Ampicillin, +Ampicillin/Clavulanic acid, Piperacillin/ Tazobactam, Oxacillin, +Cefaclor, +Cefradine, +Cefuroxime, +Cefdinir, +Cefixime, +Cefotaxiacillin, +Cefaclor, +Cefradine, +Cefuroxime, +Cefdinir, +Cefixime, +Cefotaxime, +Ceftazidime, +Ciprofloxacin, Moxifloxacin, InducibleClindamycin Resistance, +Clarithromycin, Erythromycin, Clindamycin, Linezolid, Teicoplanin, Vancomycin, +Doxycycline, Tetracycline, Tigecycline, Fosfornycin, Nitrofurantoin, FusidicAcid, Mupirocin, Rifampicin, +Trimethoprim, Trimethoprim/ Sulfamethoxazole, Augmentin, Cefotaxime 3rd, Ciprofloxacin, Doxycycline, Amoxycillin, Cefuroxime, Norfloxacin, Trimethroprim- Sulfame, Cefixime 3rd, Azithromycin, Clindamycin.

Special Middle schools have Three grades each grade have Two classes.

Results and Discussion

From the present study 252 samples of indoor air and air conditioners of 25 schools (Middle Schools) Public and Special, that was collected from east and centre of Riyadh in, Saudi Arabia between October and November 2015 (Table 1). Collecting of the samples were conducted in the autumn during this season, the mean humidity value was relatively (21% and 36%) in October and November respectively, with the decrease in the environmental temperature, due to the use of air conditioners. The minimum temperature degrees were (20.9°C - 15.4°C) and the maximum were (28.1°C - 21.4°C). Bouillard L et al. [27] found that the humidity recorded in the autopsy room was significantly low in the summer (because of air conditioner).The mean humidity value of the room at the time of the autopsy was 56%. It was determined that humidity had no effect on the amount of bacteria and fungi grown by two methods during each sampling season (p>0.05). The amount of the microbial content of indoor air of school is an important parameter because it has a direct impact on the mental health, physical development and performance of the students. Numerous studies have shown that occurrence of bacteria and moulds in the air of school poses a great risk to children [14,17,18,28,29]. In the present study the most common bacterial isolates were, Gram negative bacteria (Pseudomonas stutzeri, Francisella tularensis and Ralstonia mannitolilytica ) of the total airborne bacteria. Whereas, the prevailing Gram positive bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus, followed by Kocuria kristinae (Table 3). Pastuszka JS et al. [30] found that some bacteria, such as coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium and Bacillus, were predominant (42.7%, 20.4% and 6.9% of the total, respectively) in the indoor air of primary schools in Edirne City, Turkey. While [25] observed that the bacterial profile of indoor air sample showed that S. aureus was the most frequently isolated species among potential pathogenic bacteria identified in both SW and OR units. But, in Chalachew G et al. [24] stated that Staphylococcus is the most frequently occurring bacteria in clinic/hospital rooms 44 followed by Micrococcus, which together contributed 58-78% of total bacteria concentration [31]. However, Bouillard L et al. [27] point out that the amount of normal bacterial flora, particularly such as CNS, diphteroid bacillus and Micrococcus spp., were increased with the number of staff present in the room. Microbiological indoor air quality of a school is an important factor for children’s health, as school serve a daily environment for them. Microbial concentration of indoor air of the school is affected by many factors, including human activity, the age of school building, ventilation conditions, outdoor air, season (primarily temperature and humidity), etc. [13]. Strong relationship between occupant density, human activity and microorganisms concentration in the indoor air was reported elsewhere [32-34]. Among the five schools that were included during this study, it was found that the highest bacterial concentration in heavily populated in workplaces. Also, the highest level of bacterial contamination was detected in the class rooms during lessons. Relatively high concentrations of bacteria was observed in the public schools (where overcrowded classrooms). This study is in agreement with the work of, Li WM et al. [34] who suggests that the highest bacterial concentration in heavily populated workplaces. While Fleische RM et al. [34] states that in schools the highest level of bacterial contamination was detected in the corridor and in rooms. During lessons and after lessons the number of microorganisms was much lower. But, Carvalho CL et al. [35] evaluating many shopping centres in Hong Kong found different bacteria levels on the weekend when the number of people inside the building increased. However, Stryjakowska-Sekulska et al. [9] reported in their investigation just after the short period of high microorganism’s concentration in the air of investigated rooms a gradual decrease of microbial contamination. The bacterial species isolated during this investigation from the indoor air of the special schools were Pseudomonas stutzeri, Ralstonia mannitolytica and Staphylococcus aureus, also Pseudomonas stutzeri was isolated from the air conditioners (Table 3). But, Kocuria kristinae and Francisella tularensis were isolated only from the indoor air of public schools. In the special schools the level of bacterial contamination was lower than public schools. Among the bacterial pathogens present in the tested classrooms there were Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularaemia [36]. Stryjakowska-Sekulska et al. [9] Considered the analysis of bacterial flora composition in investigated University rooms revealed dominating contributions of bacteria from the following genera: Micrococcus spp., Bacillus spp., Staphylococcus spp. (e.g. Staphylococcus aureus), Sarcina spp., and Serratia spp. Also some gram negative bacteria belonging to Escherichia genus were isolated from indoor air of toilets. While, MaĆ?gorzata GS et al. [13] recorded that the bacterial species from Micrococcus and Bacillus genera were predominant indoors,(Micrococcus luteus, Micrococcus spp., Staphylococcus warneri, Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus cereus) strains present in the air were also isolated in settled dust samples from the ducts of the AC systems. According to some previous studies the microbiological quality of indoor air is highly influenced by the microbiological composition of outdoor air, which itself very much influenced by environment, season, the weather and even daytime [9,37]. During this study, the cases observed of the most common disease in the investigated schools between teachers and students varied between acute disease (sore throat, stomach ache, cold, fever, tonsillitis, flu cough, headache and dizziness) and chronic disease (asthma, anaemia, urinary tract infection, rheumatoid, eczema, chest allergy) (Table 2). It was observed that the diseases were common when the student›s age was between (11-16) years but, the diseases were fewer when the teacher›s age was between (29-40). Results of this study confirm the considerable microbial contamination of most investigated school settings. It should be emphasized that a real hazard of such pollution levels may be more serious because there are suggestions that in some cases the level of total bacteria may be even up to 5-times higher than the number of cultural bacteria determined. It’s clear that high contamination of indoor air at schools poses a serious problem both from the point of view of health protection and environmental engineering [38]. Exposure to these microorganisms may cause allergies, respiratory and immunotoxic diseases [4]. But, considered that a great number of those microorganisms are emitted into the air during talking, coughing, sneezing or peeling of the epidermis. Also, lack of cleaning and checking out of the heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems (HVAC) may allow microbial growth, which causes rhinitis, bronchitis, pharyngitis, pneumonia, conjunctivitis and keratitis in the users. While, Colleen Nelson [39] evaluating dangerous bacteria in some air conditioners may be making you sick it leads to Legionnaire›s disease, or pontiac fever. You can contract it by inhaling a water organism often found in air conditioners. Also, Teklu S et al. [40] states that hot temperatures and rain are turning air conditioners into potential breeding grounds for bacteria. But they still suggest cleaning the filters of your air conditioners every few months. With the cooler months approaching he says›s it becomes even more important to make sure your air conditioner is clean (Table 3).

Table 3: Bacterial species isolated from the indoor air and air conditioners of five schools.

Results obtained in this study showed that the bacterial species varied in their susceptibility to all the antimicrobials used. Majority of them showed resistance to one or more of antimicrobials compounds. It was observed that Ciprofloxacin, was the most effective antibiotic to all bacterial species used during this study. The same instance was evident in a study conducted by Mohammedaman M et al. [41] who reported that all gram-negative bacteria isolates were susceptible to Ciprofloxacin. In the present investigation, Cefuroxime, Cefotaxime, Clindamycin and +Doxycycline were effective to all bacterial species except Pseudomonas stutzeri, which showed high resistance to Nitrofurantoin (256) and also resistance to Cefazolin and Cefoxitin (64), but it was sensitive toTrimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole [40]. While, Mulu A et al. [42] stated that Gentamicin, Norfloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, Vancomycin and Amikacin were the most effective antibiotics to all bacterial isolates. In this study, Staphylococcus aureus was resistance to Benzylpenicillin, +Amoxicillin, +Ampicillin, +Cefixime, +Ceftazidime. This was consistent with study done elsewhere [43-47]. The same isolate was intermediate to Rifampicin and it was sensitive to Vancomycin beside 25 antibiotic compound as shown in Table 4. This study is in agreement with the work of Bibi S et al. [48], Shamsuzzaman A et al. [49], Gelaw A [50], Shriyan A et al. [51]. WHO reported that clinical Staphylococci are 100% sensitive to Vancomycin. Also, in this study, Ralstonia mannitolilytica was sensitive to11 antibiotics compound Table 4. However, K. kistinae and F. tularensis were sensitive to 9 antibiotics and were resistant to Azithromycin, while these two species recorded the least resistance to Trimethroprim-Sulfame. This study was comparable with the previous studies done by Chalachew G et al. [24] and Sneath PHA et al. [25] (Table 4).

Table 4: Antimicrobial agent’s susceptibility of isolated bacteria.

Conclusions

The bacterial profile of indoor air samples showed that Pseudomonas stutzeri, Ralstonia mannitolytica and Staphylococcus aureus, were isolated from the special schools, also Pseudomonas stutzeri was isolated from the air conditioners. But, Kocuria kristinae, Staphylococcus aureus and Francisella tularensis were isolated only from the indoor air of public schools. Among the bacterial pathogens present in the tested classrooms there were Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularaemia. It was found that the highest bacterial concentration in heavily populated in workplaces. Also, the highest level of bacterial contamination was detected in the class rooms during lessons. Relatively high concentrations of bacteria was observed in the public schools (where overcrowded classrooms). Lack of cleaning and checking out of the heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems (HVAC) may allow microbial growth, which causes several diseases in the users. Cleaning the filters of air conditioners every few months. With the cooler months approaching it becomes even more important to make sure that air conditioner is clean. The study revealed that there was alarmingly high level of antimicrobial resistance among bacteria isolated from 252 samples of indoor air and air conditioners of 25 schools (Middle Schools) of the total isolates were resistant to 1 or more antibiotics. It was observed that Ciprofloxacin was the most effective antibiotic to all bacterial species used during this study.

References

1. Benjamin B, Mina M (2007) Microbial air quality in a 50-year-old middle school. Pacific Heights Indoor Air Quality. pp: 1-6.
2. Abdel HAA, Farag SA (1999) An indoor bio-contaminants air quality. Int J Environ Health Res 9: 313.
3. Pope AM, Patterson R, Burge H (1993) Indoor Allergens. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
4. Douwes JP, Thorne NP, Heederik D (2003) Bio-aerosol health Effects and exposure assessment: Progress and prospects. Ann Occup Hyg 47: 187- 200.
5. Bartlett KH, Kennedy SM, Brauer M, Van Netten C, Dill B (2004) Evaluation and determinants of airborne bacterial concentrations in school classrooms. J Occup Environ Hyg 1: 639- 647.
6. Kavita N, Jyoti G (2013) Microbial air contamination in a school. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 2: 404-410.
7. Würtz H, Kildeso J, Meyer HW, Nielsen JB (1999) A pilot study on airborne microorganisms in Danish class- rooms. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Edinburgh, Scotland.
8. Gunderman KO (1974) The bacterial content of various hospital departments. Zent Boket Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg Abt 1 orig Reibe B 159: 231.
9. Stryjakowska-Sekulska, AM, Piotraszewska-PajÄ?k, Szyszka A, Nowicki M, Filipiak M (2007) Microbiological quality of indoor air in university rooms. Polish J of Environ Stud 16: 623-632.
10. Flannigan B (2001) Microbial aerosolsin buildings: origins, health implications and controls. Proceedings of the II International Scientific Conference: Microbial Biodegradation and Biodeterioration of Ttechnical Materials.  pp: 11-27.
11. Daisey JM, Angell WJ, Apte MG (2003) Indoor air quality, ventilation and health symptoms in schools: an analysis of existing information. Indoor Air 13: 53.
12. Pieckova E, Kunova Z (2002) Indoor fungi and their ciliostatic metabolites. Ann Agric Environ Med 9: 59.
13. MaĆ?gorzata GS, RafaĆ? LG (2010) Bacterial and fungal aerosols in air-conditioned office buildings in Warsaw, Poland. JOSE 16: 465-476.
14. JÄ?drzejewska-Ć?cibak, Sowa J (2002) Publishing House of Warsaw. University of Technology, Warsaw.
15. Kusunoki T, Morimoto T, Nishikomori R, Yasumi T, Heike T (2009) Changing prevalence and severity of childhood allergic disease in Kyoto, Japan from 1996 to 2006. Allergal Tnt 58: 543-548.
16. Amarasekeram ND, Gunawardena NK, deSilva NR, Weerasinghe A (2010) Prevalence of childhood atopic diseases in Western Province of Srilanka Ceylon. Med J 55: 5-8.
17. Quah BS, Wan-Pauzi I, Ariffin N, Mazidah AR (2005) Prevalence of asthma, eczema and allergic rhinitis: two surveys 6 years apart in Kota Bharu, Malaysia. Respirology 10: 244- 249.
18. Richards W (1986) Allergy, asthma, and school problems. J School Health 56: 151-152.
19. Morey P, Jotten J, Burge H, Chatigny M, Feeley J, et al. (1986) Airborne viable microorganisms in office environments: Sampling protocol and analytical procedures. Appl Ind Hyg 1: R19-R23.
20. Vincent D, Annesi I, Lambrozo J (1997) Ventilation system, indoor air quality, and health
21. outcomes in parisian modern office workers.Environ Res 75: 100-112.
22. Cooley JD, Wong WC, Jumper CA, Straus DC (1998) Correlation between the prevalence of certain fungi and sick building syndrome. Occup Environ Med 55: 579-584.
23. Claudia R, Jose Roberto de M, Terezinha Inez ES, Ulisses A, Galdino A (2004) Studies on fungal and bacterial population of airconditioned environments. Braz Arch Biol Technol 47: 827-835.
24. Diriba L, Kassaye A, Yared M (2014) Identification, characterization and antibiotic susceptibility of indoor airborne bacteria in selected wards of Hawassa University Teaching and Referral Hospital, South Ethiopia. OALib PrePrints3: 287-292.
25. Chalachew G, Gebre K, Wondewosen T (2011) Indoor air bacterial load and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of isolates in operating rooms and surgical wards at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci 21: 9–17.
26. Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holt JG (1986) Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology.
27. Ersel S, Hakan MO, Ergon MC, Yonca S, Serpil S, et al.(2011) Microbiological detection of bacteria and fungi in the autopsy room. Rom J Leg Med 19: 33-44.
28. Bouillard L, Michel O, Dramaix M, Devleeschouwer M ( 2005) Bacterial contamination of indoor air, surfaces, and settled dust, and related dust endotoxin concentrations in healthy office buildings. Ann Agric Environ Med 12: 187-192.
29. Koshy G, Delpisheh A, Brabin BJ (2010) Trends in prevalence of childhood and parental asthma in Merseyside 1991- 2006. J Public Health 32: 488-495.
30.  Halide A, Ahmet A, Muserref TO, Mevlut T (2005) Monitoring of fungi and bacteria in the indoor air of primary schools in Edirne City, Turkey. ‎Indoor Built Environ 14: 411-425.
31. Halide A, Ahmet A, Muserref TO, Mevlut T (2005) Monitoring of fungi and bacteria in the indoor air of primary schools in Edirne City, Turkey. ‎Indoor Built Environ 14: 411-425.
32. Pastuszka JS, Marchwinska-WE, Wlazlo A (2005) Bacterialaerosol in Silesian hospital: preliminary results. Polish J Environ Studies 14: 883-890.
33. Karwowska E (2003) Microbiological air contamination in some educational settings. Polish J Environ Studies 12: 181.
34. Fleische RM, Bober-Gheek B, Bortkiewicz O, Rusiecka-Ziolko WJ (2006) Microbiological control of airborne contamination in hospitals. Indoor Built Environ 15: 53.
35. Toivol AM, Alm S, Reponen T, Kolari S, Nevalainen A (2002) Personal exposures and micro environmental concentrations of particles and bio aerosols. J Environ Monit 4: 166.
36. Li WM, Lee SC, Chan LY (2001) Indoor air quality at nine shopping malls in Hong Kong. Sci Total Environ 273: 27-40.
37. Carvalho CL, Lopes de Carvalho I, Zé-Zé L, Núncio MS, Duarte EL (2014) Tularaemia: A challenging zoonosis. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 37: 205-270.
38. Agnieszka K, Aleksandra BI (2007) Microbial air contamination in indoor environment of a university library Wilk. Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Institute of Ecology and EnvironmentProtection, Nicholas Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland. NiepodlegĆ?oĆ?ci 10: 967.
39. (2008) Ronald Fink is with RGF Environmental Group, Inc.The NEWS Magazine.
40. Colleen Nelson (2014) Dangerous bacteria in some air conditioners may be making you sick. NewsChannel 10. Copyright ©2014.
41. Dutkiewicz J (2004) Biologiczne czynniki zagroĆŒenia zawodowego-aktualne problem. Occupational biohazards Med Pr 55: 31-40.
42. Teklu S, Getenet B, Tesfaye K, Tsegaye S (2013) Bacterial contamination, bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of isolates from stethoscopes at Jimma University Specialized Hospital. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 12: 39.
43. Mohammedaman M, Alemseged A, Tsegaye S (2014) Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates from wound infection and their sensitivity to alternative topical agents at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, South-West Ethiopia. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 13:14.
44. Mulu A, Moges F, Tessema B, Kassu A (2006) Patterns and multiple drug resistance of bacterial pathogens at university of Gondar teaching hospital. Northwest Ethiopia Ethiop Med J 44: 125-131.
45. Mulu W, Kibru G, Beyene G, Damtie M (2012) Postoperative nosocomial infections and antimicrobial resistance pattern of bacteria isolates among patients admitted at Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, Bahirdar. Ethiopia Ethiop J Health Sci 22: 7-18.
46. Taiwo S, Okesina A, Onile B (2002) In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates from wound infections in University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital. Afr J Clin Exp Microbiol 3: 6-10.
47. Goswami N, Trivedi HR, Goswami APP (2011) Antibiotic sensitivity profile of bacterial pathogens in postoperative wound infections at a tertiary care hospital in Gujarat, India. J Pharm Pharm 2: 158-164.
48. Suchitra JB, Lakshmidevi N (2009) Surgical site infections: assessing risk factors, outcomes and antimicrobial sensitivity patterns. Afr J Microbiol Res 3: 175-179.
49. Bessa LJ, Fazii P, Giulio MD, Cellini L (2013) Bacterial isolates from infected wounds and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern: some remarks about wound infection. Int Wound J 12: 47-52.
50. Bibi S, Channa GA, Siddiqui TR, Ahmed W (2012) Pattern of bacterial pathogens in postoperative wounds and their sensitivity patterns. J Surg Pak Int 17: 164-167.
51. Shamsuzzaman A, Sirajee A, Rahman M, Miah A, Hossain M (2003) Pattern of aerobic bacteria with their drug susceptibility of surgical inpatients. Mymensingh Med J 12: 98-103.
52. Gelaw A (2011) Isolation of bacterial pathogens from patients with postoperative surgical site infections and possible sources of infections at University of Gondar Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. J Environ Occup Sci 3: 103-108.