Otolaryngology: Open Access
Open Access

Aural foreign bodies; Nasal foreign bodies; Teenagers; Hyperkinetic disorders; Developmental problems; congenital malformations

Introduction

Aural and nasal foreign bodies represent a significant healthcare challenge, particularly in teenagers, where curiosity and experimentation are common. While the management of foreign bodies in these anatomical sites is well-documented, their epidemiology and potential correlation with underlying conditions such as hyperkinetic disorders, developmental problems, and congenital malformations remain underexplored [1]. This short communication aims to shed light on these aspects, providing insights for clinicians and policymakers.

Epidemiology: The incidence of aural and nasal foreign bodies in teenagers varies globally, influenced by cultural practices, socioeconomic factors, and access to healthcare services. However, studies indicate a higher prevalence in urban areas with increased exposure to small objects and environmental pollutants [2]. Male adolescents tend to be more susceptible due to their adventurous nature and higher likelihood of engaging in risky behaviors.

Correlation with hyperkinetic disorders: Hyperkinetic disorders, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and impulse control disorders have been implicated in the occurrence of aural and nasal foreign bodies in teenagers [3]. The impulsivity and inattentiveness characteristic of these conditions may lead adolescents to insert foreign objects into their ears and noses, often as a result of impulsive actions or seeking sensory stimulation.

Correlation with developmental problems: Teenagers with developmental problems, such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disabilities are at an increased risk of aural and nasal foreign bodies. Challenges with sensory processing and communication may contribute to inappropriate object insertion behaviors as a means of self-stimulation or expression. Moreover, deficits in social skills and understanding of safety may further predispose these individuals to accidents involving foreign bodies [4].

Correlation with congenital malformations: Certain congenital malformations, such as cleft lip and palate, craniofacial anomalies, and nasal septal deviations, can predispose teenagers to aural and nasal foreign bodies. Anatomical irregularities may disrupt normal airflow and drainage, increasing the likelihood of foreign body entrapment or irritation. Additionally, adolescents with congenital malformations may experience social challenges or bullying, leading to intentional foreign body insertion as a coping mechanism [5,6].

Conclusion

Aural and nasal foreign bodies in teenagers represent more than just accidental occurrences; they often reflect underlying conditions such as hyperkinetic disorders, developmental problems, and congenital malformations. Clinicians should consider these associations when managing cases of foreign body insertion, adopting a holistic approach that addresses both the acute presentation and underlying predisposing factors. Public health efforts aimed at raising awareness and promoting safe behaviors among teenagers are essential for reducing the burden of aural and nasal foreign bodies in this population.

Acknowledgments

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Weinfeld AB, Hollier LH, Spira M, Stal S (2005) International trends in the treatment of cleft lip and palate. Clinics in Plastic Surgery 32:19-23.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref, Indexed at

2. Adenwalla HS Narayanan PV (2009) Primary unilateral cleft lip repair. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery 42:62-70.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref, Indexed at

3. Tennison CW (1952) The repair of the unilateral cleft lip by the stencil method. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 9:115-120.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref, Indexed at

4. Grayson BH, Santiago PE, Brecht LE, Cutting CB (1999) Presurgical nasoalveolar molding in infants with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 36:486-498.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref, Indexed at

5. Uzel A, Alparslan ZN (2011) Long-term effects of presurgical infant orthopedics in patients with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 48:587-595.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref, Indexed at

6. Shetty V, Vyas HJ, Sharma SM, Sailer HF (2012) A comparison of results using nasoalveolar moulding in cleft infants treated within 1 month of life versus those treated after this period development of a new protocol. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 41:28-36.

Google Scholar, Cross Ref, Indexed at