Journal of Powder Metallurgy & Mining
Open Access

Pyrometallurgy; thermal decomposition; Whether praseodymium; Lanthanide metals in mercury

Introduction

Hydrometallurgy was used to make transition metals in groups 6–16, while pyrometallurgy was used to make electropositive lanthanide and actinide metals [1]. However, it has been demonstrated that controlled current electrolysis of uranium and neptunium metals with a mercury electrode in aqueous solutions, followed by thermal decomposition of the amalgams, can successfully produce these metals. In addition, the virtue of uranium metals was viewed as over and the items in oxygen and nitrogen were under 10 and 5 ppm, separately. The result indicates that actinide ions combine outside of the aqueous potential window, and it appears that hydrometallurgy produces electropositive metals of comparable quality to conventional pyrometallurgy.

Besides, lanthanum and cerium metals were ready by the equivalent hydrometallurgy strategy [2]. The yields from amalgamation were close to 100%. The arrangement yields of lanthanide metals, be that as it may, decayed during warm deterioration because of the thickness distinction among lanthanide and mercury. Oxygen and nitrogen contents in the pre-arranged metals were viewed as practically identical with those in financially accessible ones [3]. Since the half-wave mixture capability of praseodymium is more negative than those of lanthanum and cerium, it is fascinating whether praseodymium particles can be diminished to a metallic state in a fluid arrangement.

In contrast, in order to determine the solubilities of lanthanide metals in mercury, sodium amalgam-prepared lanthanide amalgams were concentrated by filtration under reduced pressure with a glass filter. Likewise, in the event that most unadulterated mercury can be eliminated from lanthanide combinations by filtration before warm decay, the arrangement yield of lanthanide metals will be gotten to the next level [4]. In the current work, the readiness of praseodymium metal is endeavored by the hydrometallurgy technique. Besides, the centralization of mixture by filtration before warm decay is endeavored to further develop the arrangement yields of praseodymium metal.

Hydrometallurgy is a branch of extractive metallurgy that involves the use of aqueous solutions, or hydrometallurgical processes, to recover metals from their ores or concentrates. It is a widely used method for the extraction and purification of metals due to its versatility and ability to treat a wide range of raw materials. The process of hydrometallurgy typically involves several stages, including ore preparation, leaching, solution purification, metal recovery, and product refinement. Let's briefly explore each of these stages [5 ]. Ore Preparation the first step in hydrometallurgy is preparing the ore or concentrate for further processing. This may involve crushing, grinding, and sometimes concentration through techniques such as flotation or magnetic separation. The goal is to increase the surface area and expose the valuable metal-containing minerals.

Leaching leaching is a fundamental step in hydrometallurgical processes. It involves the dissolution of metal ions from the ore or concentrate into an aqueous solution [6]. Leaching is often carried out using acid or alkaline solutions, or sometimes by employing bacteria or other microorganisms to aid in the process. The choice of leaching agent depends on the specific ore and desired metal extraction. Solution Purification after leaching, impurities and unwanted elements are often present in the solution. Solution purification techniques such as precipitation, solvent extraction, ion exchange, or electrochemical methods are employed to remove these impurities and concentrate the desired metal ions. Metal recovery once the metal ions are concentrated, they are recovered from the solution. This can be achieved through various techniques such as precipitation, electrowinning, or reduction. Precipitation involves adding a chemical reagent to the solution to selectively convert the metal ions into solid metal compounds. Electrowinning utilizes an electric current to deposit the metal onto a cathode, while reduction involves the use of a reducing agent to convert the metal ions into a metallic form [7 ].

Product refinement the final stage of hydrometallurgy involves refining the recovered metal product to achieve the desired purity and specifications. This can involve additional purification steps such as electrorefining, thermal treatment, or chemical processes. The field of hydrometallurgy continues to evolve with ongoing research and development to optimize processes, improve efficiency, and address environmental concerns. It plays a crucial role in the sustainable production of metals and the recycling of valuable materials from secondary sources.

Methods and Materials

Hydrometallurgy encompasses various methods and materials for the extraction and purification of metals from ores or concentrates [8]. Here are some commonly used techniques and materials in hydrometallurgical processes. Leaching agents leaching involves the dissolution of metal ions from the ore or concentrate. Different leaching agents can be employed based on the specific requirements of the process. Some common leaching agents include: Acidic leaching acids such as sulfuric acid (H2SO4), hydrochloric acid (HCl), and nitric acid (HNO3) are often used for leaching metals like copper, uranium, and nickel.

Alkaline leaching

Alkaline solutions like sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) are utilized for leaching metals such as aluminum and some rare earth elements. Cyanide leaching sodium cyanide (NaCN) or potassium cyanide (KCN) solutions are employed for gold and silver extraction [9]. Solvent extraction is a common technique used to separate and purify metals from the leach solution. It involves the transfer of metal ions from an aqueous phase to an organic solvent phase using specific extractants.

Ion exchange

Ion exchange is another method employed for separating and purifying metal ions. It involves the exchange of metal ions between a solid ion exchange resin and the leach solution. The resin selectively adsorbs the target metal ions while releasing other unwanted ions. Electrorefining and electrowinning are electrochemical methods used for the recovery and purification of metals from solution. In electrorefining, a metal electrode is dissolved to transfer metal ions into a solution, while in electrowinning, metal ions are deposited onto a cathode to form a solid metal. Commonly used materials in these processes. Electrolytes solutions containing metal ions, such as copper sulfate (CuSO4) or nickel sulfate (NiSO4).

Electrodes anode and cathode materials, typically made of the respective metals, such as copper anodes and stainless steel cathodes [10]. Electrical power sources, such as rectifiers or batteries, to supply the necessary current for electrodeposition. Precipitation is used to recover metals from a solution by converting metal ions into solid metal compounds. Common precipitating agents include:

Chemical precipitants reagents such as sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), or lime (calcium hydroxide, Ca(OH)2) are used to form insoluble metal hydroxides or carbonates. Reducing agents substances like zinc dust (Zn) or sodium metabisulfite (Na2S2O5) can be employed to reduce metal ions and precipitate the corresponding metal. These methods and materials are just a few examples within the broad field of hydrometallurgy. The specific techniques and materials used depend on the target metal, ore characteristics, environmental considerations, and desired final product requirements.

Results and Discussions

In hydrometallurgy, the results and discussion section of a study typically present and analyze the data obtained during the various stages of the hydrometallurgical process. This section provides a detailed evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of the processes employed, as well as the quality of the obtained metal product. Here are some key points typically covered in the results and discussion section:

Metal extraction efficiency this subsection focuses on the percentage of metal extracted from the ore or concentrate. It presents data on the leaching efficiency and factors that influence it, such as leaching time, temperature, concentration of leaching agents, and ore characteristics [11]. The results are compared to previous studies or industry standards, and any deviations or improvements are discussed. Impurity removal hydrometallurgical processes often involve the removal of impurities from the leach solution. The results and discussion section evaluates the efficiency of impurity removal techniques such as solvent extraction, ion exchange, or precipitation. It may include data on the concentration of impurities before and after purification steps, as well as discussions on the selectivity and capacity of the employed methods.

Metal recovery techniques this subsection focuses on the recovery of the target metal from the purified solution. It presents data on the efficiency of recovery methods such as electrowinning, precipitation, or reduction. The discussion may include factors affecting recovery efficiency, such as current density, temperature, pH, or concentration of reducing agents. Any challenges or limitations encountered during the recovery process are also discussed. Product quality the results and discussion section evaluates the quality of the obtained metal product. This includes data on the purity of the recovered metal, its physical properties, and its compliance with desired specifications or industry standards. The discussion may include comparisons with other production methods or the quality of metals obtained from different ore sources.

Energy consumption and environmental impact hydrometallurgical processes are often assessed for their energy efficiency and environmental impact. The results and discussion section may present data on energy consumption, such as electricity or reagent usage, and discuss the energy efficiency of the process. It may also address environmental considerations, such as the generation of waste products, emission of pollutants, or the potential for recycling or reusing process solutions. Comparison and optimization the results and discussion section often includes comparisons with alternative methods or previous studies. It discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the employed hydrometallurgical processes and suggests possible optimizations or improvements [12]. This may involve the exploration of different process parameters, alternative reagents, or modifications to enhance overall efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability.

The results and discussion section serves as the core of a hydrometallurgical study, providing a comprehensive analysis of the obtained results and their implications. It allows researchers and readers to evaluate the performance of the process, identify areas for improvement, and contribute to the advancement of hydrometallurgical techniques.

Conclusion

In hydrometallurgy, the conclusion section of a study summarizes the key findings, implications, and significance of the research conducted. It provides a concise overview of the outcomes of the study and offers a final analysis of the hydrometallurgical processes employed. The conclusion section serves as the final reflection and synthesis of the study, encapsulating the key outcomes and their implications. It provides closure to the research and offers insights for future investigations and advancements in hydrometallurgical practices.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Niinomi M, Nakai M, Hieda J (2012) Development of new metallic alloys for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater 8: 3888-3903.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, CrossRef

2. Xu W, Lu X, Wang LN, Shi ZM, Lv SM, et al. (2018) Mechanical properties, in vitro corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of metal injection molded Ti-12Mo alloy for dental applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 88: 534-547.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, CrossRef

3. Croes M, Bakhshandeh S, I Hengel AJV, Lietaert K, Kessel KPMV, et al. (2018) Antibacterial and immunogenic behavior of silver coatings on additively manufactured porous titanium. Acta Biomater 81: 315-327.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, CrossRef

4. Anuar A, Guraya T, Chen ZW, Ramezani M, Ormazabal MSS, et al. (2021) Effect of build direction dependent grain structure on fatigue crack growth of biomedical Co-29Cr-6Mo alloy processed by laser powder bed fusion. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 123: 104741.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, CrossRef

5. Jang TK, Kim DE, Han G, Yoon CB, Jung HD, et al. (2020) Powder based additive manufacturing for biomedical application of titanium and its alloys: a review. Biomed Eng Lett 10: 505-516.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, CrossRef

6. Mazigi O, Mathan BK, Xu J, Choe HC, Ye QS, et al. (2017) In-Situ Alloy Formation of a WMoTaNbV Refractory Metal High Entropy Alloy by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (PBF-LB/M). Sci Eng 3: 509-517.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, CrossRef

7. Cheisson T, Schelter EJ (2019) Rare earth elements: Mendeleev’s bane, modern marvels. Science 363: 489-493.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, CrossRef

8. Zhong T, Kindem JM, Bartholomew JG, Rochman J, Craiciu I, et al. (2017) Nanophotonic rare-earth quantum memory with optically controlled retrieval. Science 357: 1392-1395.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, CrossRef

9. Ryoo R, Kim J, Jo C, Han SW, Kim JC, et al. (2020) Rare-earth–platinum alloy nanoparticles in mesoporous zeolite for catalysis. Nature 585: 221-224.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, CrossRef

10. Wang H, Wu X, Yang Y, Nishiura M, Hou Z, et al. (2020) Co-syndiospecific Alternating Copolymerization of Functionalized Propylenes and Styrene by Rare-Earth Catalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 59: 7173-7177.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, CrossRef

11. Alonso E, Sherman AM, Wallington TJ, Everson MP, Field FR, et al. (2012) Evaluating rare earth element availability: A case with revolutionary demand from clean technologies. Environ Sci Technol 46: 3406-3414.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, CrossRef

12. Huang T, Zhang SW, Xie J, Zhou L, Liu LF, et al. (2021) Effective adsorption of quadrivalent cerium by synthesized laurylsulfonate green rust in a central composite design. J Environ Sci (China) 107: 14-25.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, CrossRef