Optometry: Open Access
Open Access

Anisocoria is a condition characterized by an unequal size of the pupils in one or both eyes. Under normal circumstances, the pupils of the eyes are equal in size and respond symmetrically to changes in light, reflecting the proper functioning of the autonomic nervous system. However, in anisocoria, the difference in pupil size is evident, with one pupil being larger or smaller than the other. This condition can be either benign or a sign of a more serious underlying medical issue, ranging from simple anatomical variations to complex neurological disorders. Anisocoria can be categorized into two main types: physiological and pathological. Physiological anisocoria, which affects a small percentage of the population, is typically harmless and does not require treatment. The difference in pupil size is usually subtle, often less than 1mm, and remains consistent without causing any symptoms or discomfort. Pathological anisocoria, however, is often associated with serious health conditions, such as nerve damage, trauma, brain injury, or eye diseases. It may also result from the use of certain medications or drugs that influence pupil response [1]. The causes of anisocoria can be diverse. Common neurological causes include Horner’s syndrome, Adie’s pupil, or third cranial nerve palsy, while traumatic causes may involve head injury or optic nerve damage. Furthermore, pharmacological factors, including the use of medications like atropine or certain eye drops, can alter the size of the pupils. Anisocoria may be accompanied by other symptoms, such as vision problems, pain, or changes in eye movement, depending on the severity and underlying cause.

Discussion

Anisocoria refers to a condition where the pupils of the eyes are unequal in size. While it can be a benign, harmless condition, it may also be a sign of an underlying health issue that requires medical attention [2]. The condition can be classified into two categories: physiological and pathological.

Physiological anisocoria is common and affects a significant portion of the population. It typically involves a minimal size difference between the pupils and does not cause any discomfort or other symptoms. This variation is considered a normal anatomical difference and often requires no treatment [3,4].

On the other hand, pathological anisocoria results from medical conditions affecting the autonomic nervous system, which controls pupil size [5,6]. Common causes include Horner’s syndrome, which is linked to nerve damage affecting pupil dilation, and Adie’s pupil, where one pupil becomes enlarged and reacts slowly to light [7,8]. Third cranial nerve palsy, which can result from a stroke, brain injury, or aneurysm, is another serious cause of anisocoria. Additionally, trauma to the eye or head, certain medications, and brain tumors can also lead to abnormal pupil size differences.

Causes of anisocoria

Anisocoria can be caused by a wide range of factors. These causes can be broadly categorized into physiological and pathological causes.

Pathological anisocoria

Pathological anisocoria occurs when there is an underlying problem that affects the autonomic nervous system, which controls the muscles of the iris. Some of the most common causes of pathological anisocoria include:

Trauma to the eye: Injury to the eye or head can result in anisocoria. For example, blunt trauma to the eye can damage the muscles that control pupil dilation and constriction, leading to unequal pupil sizes.

Adie's pupil (tonic pupil): This is a rare condition where one pupil becomes larger than the other and reacts slowly to light. It is caused by damage to the parasympathetic nerve fibers that control the pupil. The condition typically affects young women and is generally benign, though it may be associated with other neurological issues [9].

Horner’s syndrome: This condition results from damage to the sympathetic nerves that affect pupil dilation. The signs of Horner's syndrome include a smaller pupil (miosis) in one eye, ptosis (drooping eyelid), and anhidrosis (lack of sweating) on the affected side of the face. Horner’s syndrome can be caused by a range of conditions, including stroke, tumors, or trauma to the neck or chest.

Third cranial nerve palsy: The third cranial nerve controls the muscles that constrict the pupil. Damage to this nerve can cause anisocoria, along with other symptoms such as ptosis and double vision. The causes of third cranial nerve palsy can include a variety of conditions such as aneurysms, tumors, or diabetes.

Pharmacologic agents: Certain medications or substances can affect the pupils. For instance, drugs that dilate the pupils (such as atropine or certain recreational drugs) or those that cause pupil constriction (such as opioids) can lead to anisocoria. These effects are usually temporary and resolve once the substance is eliminated from the body [10].

Brain Injury or tumors: Any condition that affects the brain, especially those that involve the brainstem, can lead to anisocoria. Brain injuries, strokes, and tumors in the brainstem area can interfere with the pathways that control the pupils, causing one pupil to be larger or smaller than the other.

Conclusion

In conclusion, anisocoria, characterized by unequal pupil sizes, can be a benign and harmless condition, but it can also signal a more serious underlying medical issue. When the condition is physiological, typically observed with a minimal difference in pupil size, it does not cause symptoms or pose a risk to health. This form of anisocoria is common and generally doesn’t require treatment, as it is considered a normal anatomical variation. However, when anisocoria is pathological, it may be linked to various health concerns, including nerve damage, trauma, or neurological conditions like Horner’s syndrome, Adie’s pupil, and third cranial nerve palsy. These conditions can sometimes indicate severe issues such as strokes, brain tumors, or aneurysms, which may require immediate medical intervention. Symptoms associated with pathological anisocoria, such as headaches, blurred vision, ptosis, or light sensitivity, should never be ignored. Prompt diagnosis through eye examinations, neurological assessments, and imaging studies is essential to determine the cause and guide appropriate treatment.

1. cBiró B, Köves-Péchy K, Vörös I, Takács T, Eggenberger P, et al. (2000) Interrelations between Azospirillum and Rhizobium nitrogen-fixers and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the rhizosphere of alfalfa in sterile, AMF-free or normal soil conditions. Appl Soil Ecol 15:159-168.

               Google Scholar, Crossref

2. cChaney R, Angle JS, Mcintosh M, Reeves R, Li YM, et al. (2005) Using hyperaccumulator plants to phytoextract soil Ni and Cd. J Biosci 60: 190-198.

               Indexed at, Google Scholar

3. cFaridul A, Tae YK, Song YK, Sadia SA, Prabhat P, et al.(2015)Effect of molybdenum on nodulation, plant yield and nitrogen uptake in hairy vetch. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 61: 664-675.

              Google Scholar, Crossref

4. cBegum N, Qin C, Ahanger MA, Raza S, Khan MI, et al. (2019) Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Plant Growth Regulation: Implications in Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Front Plant Sci 10: 1-5.

              Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. cBellenger J, Wichard T, Kustka A(2008) Uptake of molybdenum and vanadium byanitrogen-fixing soil bacterium usingsiderophores.Nature Geosci1: 243-246.

               Google Scholar, Crossref

6. cBhattacharjee RB, Singh A, Mukhopadhyay SN (2008) Use of nitrogen-fixing bacteria as biofertiliser for non-legumes: prospects and challenges.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol80: 199-209.

               Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. cAlbert KM (2015) Role of revegetation in restoring fertility of degraded mined soils in Ghana: A review Int J Biodivers Conserv 7: 57-80.

              Google Scholar, Crossref

8. cAntosiewicz DM (1992) Adaptation of plants to an environment polluted with heavy metals. Byul Izobr 61: 281-299.

              Google Scholar

9. cBaker AJM (1981) Accumulators and excluders ‐strategies in the response of plants to heavy metals. J Plant Nutr 3: 643-654.

              Google Scholar, Crossref

10. cWang X, Wang Q, Wang S, Li F, Guo G (2012) Effect of biostimulation on community level physiological profiles of microorganisms in field-scale biopiles composed of aged oil sludge. Bioresour Technol 111: 308-315.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref