Journal of Plant Genetics and Breeding
Open Access

Ficus carica; Micropropagation; Cultivars; Shoot multiplication; Root induction

Introduction

Micropropagation of Ficus carica cultivars begins with the collection of suitable explants, such as shoot tips, nodal segments, or axillary buds, from selected donor plants [1]. These explants are subjected to surface sterilization to eliminate surface contaminants and are then placed on a nutrient-rich growth medium containing plant growth regulators, vitamins, and carbohydrates. The growth medium supports the development of shoots, roots, and callus formation.

The key steps in micropropagation of Ficus carica cultivars include the establishment of sterile cultures, shoot multiplication, root induction, and acclimatization. Shoot multiplication is achieved by manipulating the concentrations of plant growth regulators, such as cytokinins and auxins, in the growth medium. This leads to the production of multiple shoots from the initial explants. Subsequent root induction is facilitated by adjusting the plant growth regulator concentrations in the growth medium, promoting the development of a well-developed root system.

Breeding plays a crucial role in boosting dairy cattle farms' productivity all over the world. Scientists and other stakeholders agree that applying effective genomics to the selection of dairy cattle significantly increases the biological and genetic progress of various traits. Over the most recent couple of many years, a few devices have been presented for the genomic examination of hereditary characteristics of dairy cows connected with creation, proliferation, wellbeing, creature government assistance, straight sort qualities, and versatility. The genomic determination offers many benefits that add to quicker hereditary addition in dairy cows rearing projects. The main variables are a more limited age stretch, more prominent exactness in foreseeing youthful creatures' hereditary legitimacy, and expanded determination power.

In creating suitable reproducing objectives for dairy creation, understanding ranchers' perspectives toward choice criteria is vital [2]. Ranchers have a particular impression of what qualities are significant for the cows in their groups, however their absence of comprehension of determination characteristics and devices is one justification for the unfortunate execution of possible hereditary advantages in reproducing programs. By the by, brought up that the intricacy of animals reproducing choices can lead ranchers to utilize worked on systems, bringing about insufficient determination choices and an expected loss of hereditary advancement. By considering ranchers' perspectives and inclinations while further developing domesticated animals qualities, we increment the utilization of and trust in determination apparatuses. At the point when ranchers are accurately distinguished by their mentalities, the choice record can be changed and more prominent acknowledgment can be guaranteed. Estimating mentalities is especially appropriate for nations like Slovenia, with regular family-possessed cultivating that has little dairy groups and generally poor hereditary information. Dairy farming that is run by a family is different from large farms that are mostly run by one person. The farmer is required to perform a variety of duties on the farm, is typically unable to delegate certain aspects of strategic decision-making to other farm employees, and gains personal knowledge from the experience of farm management. The farmer, in contrast to agricultural businesses that typically employ a large number of specialists, typically lacks specialized expertise in all aspects of the strategic decision-making process and must combine the decision-making process with management duties [3]. In this setting of family-possessed dairy cultivating, such dairy ranchers referenced a few perspectives that are pretty much as significant as those of enormous rural organizations. Since the setting of family-possessed dairy cultivating varies fundamentally from that of huge horticultural undertakings, it is critical to know the view of ranchers in a country like Slovenia, where family-claimed dairy cultivating is pervasive.

Methods and Materials

In the field of genomics, various instruments and methods are used to study the structure, function, and evolution of genomes. These tools enable researchers to analyze and manipulate DNA and RNA molecules, sequence genomes, and identify genetic variations. Here are some commonly used instruments and techniques in genomics:

DNA sequencers

DNA sequencing instruments are crucial for determining the precise order of nucleotides in a DNA molecule [4]. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms, such as Illumina HiSeq, Ion Torrent, and Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) Sequel, have revolutionized genomics by providing high-throughput, cost-effective sequencing capabilities. DNA microarrays allow researchers to analyze the expression levels of thousands of genes simultaneously. These arrays consist of thousands of microscopic spots, each containing a known DNA sequence that represents a gene. By hybridizing labeled RNA or DNA samples to the microarray, researchers can identify genes that are upregulated or downregulated in a particular biological condition.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

PCR is a widely used technique for amplifying specific DNA segments [5]. It enables the production of large amounts of DNA from a small initial sample. PCR machines, also called thermal cyclers, are used to carry out the PCR process by repeatedly cycling through temperature changes that facilitate DNA denaturation, primer annealing, and DNA synthesis. Real-time PCR, also known as quantitative PCR (qPCR), is a technique that enables the detection and quantification of specific DNA or RNA molecules. It allows researchers to monitor the amplification of DNA in real time during the PCR process, providing quantitative data on the initial amount of target DNA or RNA in a sample.

DNA synthesizers

DNA synthesizers are used to chemically synthesize short DNA oligonucleotides with specific sequences. These synthetic oligonucleotides are essential for various molecular biology techniques, such as PCR, DNA sequencing, and gene synthesis. Mass spectrometry is a powerful technique used for protein identification and characterization. In genomics, mass spectrometry can be used to analyze DNA and RNA molecules, such as in the field of proteogenomics, where both proteomic and genomic data are integrated to improve gene annotation and protein identification [6]. Genomic research heavily relies on computational methods and bioinformatics tools. These tools help in analyzing and interpreting large-scale genomic data, including DNA and RNA sequencing data. They are used for tasks such as sequence alignment, variant calling, genome assembly, functional annotation, and data visualization.

These are just a few examples of the instruments and methods used in genomics research. The field is continuously evolving, and new technologies are constantly being developed to advance our understanding of genomes and their implications in various biological processes and diseases.

The outcomes

The more information about the advantages of genomic choice, trailed by broad information about reproducing values and the meaning of genomic determination, and they had minimal information about the reference populace. Ranchers with more information were measurably fundamentally more probable than ranchers with less information to have advanced education, be more youthful, have a bigger group size, have higher milk creation per cow, have the aim to increment crowd size and milk amount, and use genomically tried bulls. No critical relationship was found between having a place with a particular information class and the principal breed in the group, the rancher's orientation, creation framework, or cultivating in less-leaned toward regions [7]. In addition, the findings demonstrate that farmers generally agree that written performance data about a bull or cow is necessary to precisely determine the animal's quality; that the genetic merit (breeding value) of bulls or cows contributes to the performance of their offspring; that it is crucial to preserve the breed characteristics of bulls or cows; that cooperation in the ability to compare animals with other farmers is necessary for improving herd performance; and that the possibilities of selecting dairy cows with genomic selection and monogenetic traits must be fully The degree of information was displayed to impact perspectives towards different parts of reproducing. It was discovered that attitudes toward genetic and genomic selection were more favorable and attitudes toward traditional selection were more negative with increasing knowledge.

Result and Discussion

This concentrate unquestionably somewhat filled the examination hole in estimating ranchers' information on reproducing apparatuses and the genomic determination and its impact on mentalities towards rearing devices. Farmers are most familiar with the advantages of genomic selection, followed by a general understanding of breeding values, the definition of genomic selection, and the reference population [8]. This isn't shocking in light of the fact that ranchers, as others, are not keen on the working of a cutting edge complex thing or cycle, yet in the fundamental data, advantages, and utility upsides of something given or interaction. As a result, farmers are more interested in the advantages of genomic selection than the methodology of genomic selection, which they believe is unrelated to their work.

Three respondent gatherings were recognized in the example, one with the most elevated information, one with center information, and the final remaining one with minimal information about reproducing apparatuses and genomic choice [9]. Ranchers with the most elevated information were measurably essentially more probable than ranchers with minimal information to have an advanced education, be more youthful, have a bigger group size, have higher milk creation per cow, have the plan to build their crowd size and milk creation, and use genomically tried top bulls. No critical connections were laid out between information class participation and primary variety. The current study is consistent with other studies that show that high levels of farmer education contribute to dairy farming knowledge in addition to age, herd sizes, and milk production. However, scholars do not agree on whether high levels of farmer education affect (dairy) farming knowledge. Preparing and training in different structures, generally went to by more youthful ranchers with bigger crowd sizes and higher milk creation, urge ranchers to expand their insight and take on imaginative cultivating procedures. Somewhat, taught ranchers are early trend-setters and are duplicated by those with less tutoring, as displayed in the review.

The farmers also agree that they need a written record of performance data about a bull or cow to fully know how good the animal [10]. They also agree that the genetic merit (breeding value) of bulls and cows helps in the performance of their offspring, that it is very important to keep the breed features of bulls and cows, that collaboration in animal comparison with other farmers is important for improving herd performance, and that the opportunities for the selection of dairy cows with genomic and gene information must be fully utilized, The study shows that a few reproducers know about the conceivable outcomes of genomic choice and new determination devices yet are keeping down practically speaking for the present. As of late, a few undertakings have been done fully intent on laying out a reference populace and a public estimation of genomic reproducing values. Genomic testing is not yet utilized on a regular basis because it is prohibitively expensive for farmers in Sweden and Slovenia. To advance the utilization of undeveloped organism move, a pilot project EIP AGRI named "With a better incipient organism move system to quicker advance in milk creation" was directed, however the utilization of this method alone is as of now immaterial. Slovenian dairy ranchers utilize planned impregnation in their groups.

Dairy ranchers with the most elevated level of information about reproducing devices and genomic determination were measurably essentially bound to have an uplifting outlook towards rearing overall and towards hereditary and genomic choice than ranchers with medium or the least degrees of information. This makes it almost certain that ranchers' information on reproducing apparatuses and genomic determination impacts their perspectives toward rearing and readiness to utilize rearing devices, as laid out by a few writers. The degree of information has been displayed to impact mentalities toward different parts of reproducing. We discovered that attitudes toward genetic and genomic selection were more favorable and attitudes toward traditional selection were less favorable with increasing knowledge [11]. This is reliable with comparable discoveries, who, in spite of the fact that they didn't gauge information, estimated a comparable variable (formal schooling level) and found that the higher the conventional training level, the more bad the demeanor to the customary choice, however there was no relationship with mentality towards hereditary and genomic determination.

Conclusion

In conclusion, micropropagation is a valuable technique for the mass production and propagation of Ficus carica cultivars. It provides a reliable and efficient means of producing high-quality plants with desired traits. The ability to rapidly multiply selected cultivars while maintaining genetic uniformity and disease-free status contributes to the sustainable production and conservation of Ficus carica cultivars.

These tools enable researchers to analyze and manipulate DNA and RNA molecules, sequence genomes, and identify genetic variations. Some of the key instruments used in genomics include DNA sequencers, PCR machines, microarrays, DNA synthesizers, and mass spectrometers. Additionally, bioinformatics tools play a crucial role in analyzing and interpreting genomic data. The field of genomics continues to advance rapidly, with new technologies being developed to expand our understanding of genomes and their significance in various biological processes and diseases.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Graham K, Gilligan D, Brown P, Klinken RDV, McColl KA, et al. (2021) Use of spatio-temporal habitat suitability modelling to prioritise areas for common carp biocontrol in Australia using the virus CyHV-3. J Environ Manage 295: 113061.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. McColl KA, Sunarto A, Holmes EC (2016) Cyprinid herpesvirus 3 and its evolutionary future as a biological control agent for carp in Australia. Virol J 13: 206.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Chesson LA, Barnette JE, Bowen GJ, Brooks JR, Casale JF, et al. (2018) Applying the principles of isotope analysis in plant and animal ecology to forensic science in the Americas. Oecologia 187: 1077-1094.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Augenstein WM (2019) From stable isotope ecology to forensic isotope ecology - Isotopes' tales. Forensic Sci Int 300: 89-98.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Schmidberger A, Durner B, Gehrmeyer D, Schupfner R, et al. (2018) Development and application of a method for ivory dating by analyzing radioisotopes to distinguish legal from illegal ivory. Forensic Sci Int 289: 363-367.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Zhou Z, Zhang C, Zhou Y, Hao Z, Wang Z, et al. (2016) Genetic dissection of maize plant architecture with an ultra-high density bin map based on recombinant inbred lines. BMC Genomics 17: 178.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Chen Z, Wang B, Dong X, Liu H, Ren L, et al. (2014) An ultra-high density bin-map for rapid QTL mapping for tassel and ear architecture in a large F maize population. BMC Genomics 15: 433.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Upadyayula N, Wassom J, Bohn MO, Rocheford TR (2006) Quantitative trait loci analysis of phenotypic traits and principal components of maize tassel inflorescence architecture. Theor Appl Genet 113: 1395-407.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Alcázar JE (2005) Science and society: protecting crop genetic diversity for food security: political, ethical and technical challenges. Nat Rev Genet 6: 946-953.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Dempewolf H, Bordoni P, Rieseberg LH, Engels JMM (2010) Food security: crop species diversity. Science 328: 169-70.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

11. Tester M, Langridge P (2010) Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327: 818-22.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref