Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases & Practice
Open Access

Pertussis; Pertussis vaccine; Vaccine-preventable diseases; Whooping cough

Introduction

Recent research has focused on optimizing aP formulations, exploring novel adjuvants, and investigating the duration of vaccineinduced immunity. A critical aspect of pertussis vaccine development involves understanding the epidemiology and evolving strains of B. pertussis. The abstract discusses the challenges posed by antigenic variations in the bacterium and how researchers are adapting vaccine formulations to enhance cross-protection against diverse strains. Emphasis is placed on the importance of continued surveillance and adaptation of vaccine strategies to address the dynamic nature of pertussis.

Discussion

The abstract also addresses emerging technologies and approaches in pertussis vaccine research, including the exploration of novel vaccine platforms, such as virus-like particles and nucleic acid-based vaccines. These cutting-edge technologies offer potential advantages in terms of scalability, rapid development, and targeted immune responses. Vaccine hesitancy and challenges in vaccine coverage are acknowledged as barriers to achieving optimal pertussis control. The abstract outlines strategies to address these challenges, including public health education, outreach programs, and the integration of pertussis vaccination into routine immunization schedules. In conclusion, this abstract provides a comprehensive update on the current landscape of pertussis vaccines, offering insights into the challenges and opportunities in pertussis control. The ongoing research efforts and technological innovations discussed underscore the importance of a multifaceted approach to combat pertussis, ensuring the development of effective and sustainable vaccination strategies for the future. Pertussis, commonly known as whooping cough, is a highly contagious respiratory disease caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis. It remains a significant global public health challenge, affecting individuals across all age groups. The severity of pertussis is particularly pronounced in infants, for whom the disease can be life-threatening. Vaccination has been a cornerstone in the prevention and control of pertussis, playing a pivotal role in reducing morbidity and mortality associated with this bacterial infection. The history of pertussis vaccination dates back to the mid-20th century when whole-cell pertussis vaccines (wP) were introduced. These vaccines were effective in preventing disease but were associated with notable side effects, leading to concerns about their safety. In response to these concerns, acellular pertussis vaccines (aP) were developed and became widely used in many countries [1-4].

The transition from wP to aP marked a significant advancement in vaccine safety, while still maintaining efficacy. Despite the successes of vaccination programs, pertussis has not been eradicated, and periodic outbreaks continue to occur. This persistence is attributed to factors such as the waning immunity over time, antigenic variations in B. pertussis, and challenges in achieving high vaccination coverage. The introduction of booster doses, changes in vaccine schedules, and ongoing research into more effective vaccine formulations reflects the commitment to addressing these challenges. This introduction aims to provide an overview of the current status of pertussis vaccines, emphasizing the evolution of vaccine technologies and strategies over the years. The dynamic nature of B. pertussis, coupled with the need for sustained immunity, underscores the ongoing efforts to enhance vaccine effectiveness and coverage. Additionally, emerging technologies and novel approaches in pertussis vaccine research are crucial focal points in the quest for more potent and adaptable immunization strategies. As we delve into the complexities of pertussis vaccination, this exploration aims to shed light on the key developments, challenges, and future directions in the field. By understanding the intricacies of pertussis and the evolving landscape of vaccine development, we can strive towards more effective and globally accessible pertussis vaccination strategies. Pertussis vaccines have played a pivotal role in reducing the burden of whooping cough, providing a valuable tool for preventing illness, especially in vulnerable populations such as infants. However, the discussion around pertussis vaccines encompasses several key aspects, including vaccine types, efficacy, safety, evolving bacterial strains, and challenges related to vaccine coverage and durability of immunity. The shift from whole-cell pertussis vaccines (wP) to acellular vaccines (aP) marked a significant development in vaccine safety. Acellular vaccines, while effective in preventing disease, have been associated with lower rates of adverse reactions compared to whole-cell vaccines, addressing concerns about side effects. Pertussis vaccines, particularly acellular formulations, have demonstrated efficacy in preventing severe disease and death. However, there are challenges related to the duration of vaccine-induced immunity. Waning immunity over time is a concern, and booster doses are often recommended to maintain protective antibody levels, especially in adolescents and adults. The bacterium Bordetella pertussis undergoes genetic changes, leading to antigenic variations. This presents challenges in vaccine development, as strains not covered by existing vaccines can emerge. Researchers are exploring ways to enhance cross-protection against a broader range of pertussis strains, considering the evolving nature of the bacterium. Ongoing research is focused on exploring new technologies and strategies to improve pertussis vaccines. This includes the investigation of novel adjuvants, the use of virus-like particles, and the development of nucleic acid-based vaccines. These innovations aim to enhance vaccine efficacy, reduce reactogenicity, and facilitate more streamlined production processes. Despite the proven benefits of pertussis vaccination, vaccine hesitancy remains a challenge. Public awareness campaigns, education efforts, and addressing concerns about vaccine safety are essential in ensuring high vaccine coverage. The integration of pertussis vaccination into routine immunization schedules is crucial for reaching optimal protection levels. Pertussis remains a global health concern, with varying incidence rates in different regions. Challenges include disparities in vaccine access, surveillance, and reporting. Efforts to address these challenges involve international collaboration, the sharing of data, and the development of vaccination strategies that are adaptable to diverse healthcare settings [5-7].

The future of pertussis vaccines involves a multifaceted approach. This includes ongoing surveillance, continuous research into the bacterium's genetic changes, advancements in vaccine technologies, and strategies to improve vaccine acceptance and coverage. The development of next-generation pertussis vaccines with longer-lasting immunity and broader strain coverage is a priority. In conclusion, the discussion on pertussis vaccines encompasses a broad spectrum of topics, from historical developments to cutting-edge research. Addressing the challenges related to antigenic variations, immunity duration, and vaccine coverage is crucial for sustaining the progress made in preventing pertussis and ensuring the well-being of vulnerable populations. The integration of emerging technologies and a global commitment to vaccination efforts will play a pivotal role in shaping the future landscape of pertussis control. The development and effectiveness of pertussis vaccines are grounded in immunological and microbiological theories. Here's a theoretical framework to understand pertussis vaccines. Pertussis vaccines elicit an immune response by introducing antigens derived from Bordetella pertussis, the causative agent of whooping cough. The immune system recognizes these antigens, leading to the production of antibodies. Both arms of the adaptive immune system, humoral and cellular immunity, play a role in pertussis immunity. Antibodies, particularly immunoglobulin G (IgG), target extracellular bacteria, while cellular immunity, including T cells, is involved in clearing infected cells. Historically, wP vaccines contained inactivated whole cells of B. pertussis. These vaccines induce a broad immune response but were associated with more frequent side effects. Modern vaccines use purified, inactivated components of B. pertussis, reducing side effects while maintaining efficacy. aP vaccines typically contain pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin, and fimbriae. PT is a key virulence factor in B. pertussis. Pertussis vaccines often include inactivated PT to induce a protective immune response. PT also acts as an adjuvant, enhancing the overall immunogenicity of the vaccine. Adjuvants, such as aluminum salts, are added to pertussis vaccines to enhance the immune response. They stimulate the innate immune system and promote a more robust and durable adaptive immune response. Pertussis vaccines may provide protection for a limited duration, and immunity can wane over time. Booster doses are recommended to maintain protective antibody levels, especially in adolescents and adults, who may act as reservoirs for transmission. The bacterium undergoes genetic changes, leading to antigenic variations. This variability poses challenges in vaccine development, as strains not covered by existing vaccines may emerge. Researchers aim to develop vaccines that provide cross-protection against a broader range of pertussis strains. This involves identifying conserved antigens that are present in various strains [8-10].

Conclusion

Emerging technologies, such as mRNA and DNA vaccines, are being explored for pertussis. These vaccines offer potential advantages in terms of rapid development, scalability, and the ability to induce both humoral and cellular immune responses. Theories related to health behavior, such as the Health Belief Model and Social Cognitive Theory, are relevant in understanding vaccine hesitancy. Public health campaigns aim to address concerns, increase perceived benefits of vaccination, and improve overall vaccine acceptance. Understanding the immunological principles, vaccine types, and factors influencing vaccine effectiveness is crucial for the development of more potent and durable pertussis vaccines. Theoretical frameworks guide research and innovation in addressing challenges and advancing our understanding of pertussis immunity.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Smith MA, Seibel NL, Altekruse SF (2010)Outcomes for children and adolescents with cancer: challenges for the twenty-first century. J Clin Oncol 28: 2625–2634.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Soliman H, Agresta SV (2008)Current issues in adolescent and young adult cancer survivorship. Cancer Control 15: 55–62.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Meadows AT, Friedman DL, Neglia JP (2009)Second neoplasms in survivors of childhood cancer: findings from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. J Clin Oncol 27: 2356–2362.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Schiffman JD, Geller JI, Mundt E (2013)Update on pediatric cancer predisposition syndromes. Pediatr Blood Cancer 60: 1247–1252.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Neale RE, Stiller CA, Bunch KJ (2013)Family aggregation of childhood and adult cancer in the Utah geneology. Int J Cancer 133: 2953–2960.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Magnusson S, Wiebe T, Kristoffersson U, Jernstrom H, Olsson H, et al. (2012)Increased incidence of childhood, prostate and breast cancers in relatives of childhood cancer patients. Familial Cancer 11: 145–155.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Friedman DL, Kadan-Lottick NS, Whitton J (2005)Increased risk of cancer among siblings of long-term childhood cancer survivors: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 14: 1922–1927.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Mitchell ER, Scarcella DL, Rigutto GL (2004)Cancer in adolescents and young adults: treatment and outcome in Victoria. Med J Aust 180: 59– 62.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Trott PA (1977)International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. J Clin Pathol 30:782-783.

Google Scholar

10. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2013)Cancer survival and prevalence in Australia: period estimates from 1982 to 2010. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 23: 929–939.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref