Journal of Radiology
Open Access

Oral and maxillofacial radiology; Digital imaging; Cone-beam computed tomography; Artificial intelligence; Diagnosis; Treatment planning; Dental surgery; Teledentistry; Imaging technology

Introduction

Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, a specialized branch of dentistry, has witnessed a profound transformation in recent years. This transformation, driven by technological innovation and evolving clinical practices, has not only revolutionized the way dental professionals diagnose and manage oral and maxillofacial conditions but has also broadened the horizons of patient care and treatment outcomes [1]. As the foundational gateway to the human body’s health, the oral and maxillofacial region plays a pivotal role in our overall well-being, making the advancements in radiological techniques and technologies of paramount importance. This comprehensive review embarks on a journey through the dynamic landscape of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, charting its evolution from traditional radiography to the contemporary era of digital imaging, threedimensional reconstructions, and artificial intelligence applications. We delve into the historical context of radiological practices within this field, and then, with a forward-looking perspective, explore the cutting-edge trends and emerging applications that have transformed the discipline [2,3]. Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology is now poised at the intersection of dental expertise, technology, and innovation, with the potential to shape not only the way dental practitioners work but also the broader spectrum of patient care across the healthcare domain. This comprehensive review serves as an invaluable guide for both dental professionals and researchers, providing insights into the pivotal role that radiological advances play in shaping the present and future of oral and maxillofacial healthcare. From improved diagnostic accuracy to enhanced surgical planning, this article offers a panoramic view of how these advances are elevating the standards of patient care and the practice of dentistry as a whole [4].

Historical Perspective

To understand the evolution of oral and maxillofacial radiology,it is important to briefly delve into its historical development. Early radiographic techniques such as conventional radiography and panoramic radiography laid the foundation for the field. However, recent decades have witnessed a remarkable shift towards digital imaging, three-dimensional radiography, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Digital Imaging

Digital radiography has become the standard in dental practice. It offers numerous advantages, including reduced radiation exposure, immediate image acquisition, and the ability to enhance and manipulate images for more precise diagnosis [5,6]. Moreover, the integration of electronic health records has streamlined the storage and retrieval of radiographic data, improving patient care and record-keeping.

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)

CBCT is a game-changer in oral and maxillofacial radiology. This technology provides high-resolution three-dimensional images with minimal radiation exposure, making it an invaluable tool for assessing complex anatomical structures, such as the temporomandibular joint, dental implant planning, and the detection of pathologies like cysts and tumors. Its application has revolutionized treatment planning and surgical guidance [7].

Emerging trends

Recent developments in Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology include artificial intelligence (AI) applications for image analysis and interpretation, which have the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and speed [8]. AI algorithms can assist in the early detection of abnormalities and assist clinicians in making more informed decisions.

Clinical Applications

The impact of these advancements is evident in clinical practice. Oral and maxillofacial radiologists are better equipped to diagnose conditions such as temporomandibular joint disorders, impacted teeth, bone lesions, and oral cancers. Additionally, radiological imaging is an essential component in planning complex surgical procedures, including orthognathic surgery and dental implant placement [9].

Future Directions

The future of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology is promising. Ongoing research and development efforts are aimed at further reducing radiation exposure while enhancing image quality. Integration with other medical disciplines, such as otolaryngology and plastic surgery, holds potential for expanding the scope of this field. Additionally, teledentistry and teleimaging are emerging as valuable tools for remote consultations and diagnosis [10].

Conclusion

Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology has undergone significant transformations in recent years, driven by technological advancements and innovative applications. These changes have improved diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and patient care in the field of dentistry. The integration of digital imaging, CBCT, and AI technologies has expanded the horizons of oral and maxillofacial radiology. As we look toward the future, further enhancements in imaging technology and interdisciplinary collaboration promise to elevate this field to new heights, ensuring better patient outcomes and a brighter future for oral and maxillofacial radiology.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

1. Rogers L, Barani I, Chamberlain M, Kaley TJ, McDermott M, et al. (2015) Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review. J Neurosurg 122: 4-23.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Sahgal A, Weinberg V, Ma L, Chang E, Chao S, et al. (2013) Probabilities of radiation myelopathy specific to stereotactic body radiation therapy to guide safe practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85: 341-347.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Goldsmith BJ, Wara WM, Wilson CB, Larson DA (1994) Postoperative irradiation for subtotally resected meningiomas. A retrospective analysis of 140 patients treated from 1967 to 1990. J Neurosurg 80: 195-201.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Rogers L, Zhang P, Vogelbaum MA, Perry A, Ashbyet LS, et al. (2018) Intermediate-risk meningioma: initial outcomes from NRG Oncology RTOG 0539. J Neurosurg 129: 35-47.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Combs SE, Adeberg S, Dittmar JO, Welzel T, Rieken S, et al. (2017) Skull base meningiomas: long-term results and patient self-reported outcome in 507 patients treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) or intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). BMC Cancer 17: 254.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Buerki RA, Horbinski CM, Kruser T, Horowitz PM, James CD, et al. (2018) An overview of meningiomas. Future Oncol 14: 2161-2177.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Walcott BP, Nahed BV, Brastianos PK, Loeffler JS (2013) Radiation Treatment for WHO Grade II and III Meningiomas. Front Oncol 3: 227.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Anvari K, Hosseini S, Rahighi S, Toussi MS, Roshani N, et al. (2016) Intracranial meningiomas: Prognostic factors and treatment outcome in patients undergoing postoperative radiation therapy. Adv Biomed Res 5: 83.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Pollock BE, Stafford SL, Utter A, Giannini C, Schreiner SA, et al. (2003) Stereotactic radiosurgery provides equivalent tumor control to Simpson Grade 1 resection for patients with small- to medium-size meningiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55: 1000-1005.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Combs SE, Schulz-Ertner D, Moschos D, Welzel T, Rieken S, et al. (2013) Skull base meningiomas: Long-term results and patient self-reported outcome in 507 patients treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) or intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Radiother Oncol 106: 186-191.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref