Journal of Community & Public Health Nursing
Open Access

Cancer; Nursing; Workforce; Innovation

Introduction

Europe accounts for a tenth of the world's population with 446.8 million, and 25% of the world's cancer cases. In 2020, 2.7 million individuals in the European Union were diagnosed with cancer, and another 1.3 million individuals misplaced their lives to the disease (European Commission, 2021a). Without intervention, it is anticipated that the mortality rates attributed to cancer will increase by 24% by 2035 (European Commission, 2021a). As a result, there have been strong mandates at European level to tackle the burden of cancer, both over Europe and at national level [1-3]. As the largest bunch of healthcare providers (50%), nurses interact with individuals throughout their lifespan more than any other calling (World Wellbeing Association, 2022). This offers extraordinary openings to impact people's wellbeing and contribute to the mission of the European Beating Cancer Plan and EU Cancer Mission.

Nurses can be seen as the spine of the healthcare system. Cancer nurses play an imperative and often-varied role caring for people influenced by cancer. Nurses are regularly the primary point of contact for people who are analyzed with cancer within the healthcare system, and play a pivotal part in cancer care and services. There's a growing body of evidence that care conveyed by cancer nurses features a positive effect on quality of care and patient outcomes [ 4]. Cancer nurses give basic nursing care, persistent, family and community instruction and support, administer, screen and assess treatment results, identify and oversee complications, give supportive and palliative care, and collaborate on clinical research.

Cancer nursing is advancing as a profession to meet the demands of rising cancer frequency, newer and more complex treatment options, and the rise of specialist parts supporting patients from pre-diagnosis, through treatment, survivorship and end of life care. This advancement has occurred against the backdrop of critical development and investment in cancer care and therapies over the past four decades, which have emphatically impacted on cancer survival rates and results in a few regions of the world. Innovation, by its definition, alludes to new mediations which have the potential to drive change. Many innovations presented in cancer care and cancer nursing construct upon existing forms and hones, with the objective of adding value for patients, healthcare experts and the frameworks entrusted with delivery of cancer care [5- 7]. Whereas a few notably disruptive advancements have emerged in cancer treatment over the past decade, once in a while is innovation inside healthcare systems and cancer care troublesome, such that it results in changing administrations or patterns of care so significantly that they are drastically different or unmistakable from going before services. Nevertheless, developments in cancer prevention, treatment and care continue to advance, increasing the complexity of cancer care delivery, and desires of people living with and after cancer.

Therefore, the effect of emerging medications and technologies on the care and results of the person living with cancer should be at the cutting edge, regardless of the degree of disturbance emerging from the innovation. Furthermore, the effect of such innovations upon the instruction, hone and rising needs of the cancer care workforce should be a key thought in the usage of new approaches to care, particularly in the confront of developing challenges for cancer care. Nurses are the biggest profession within the cancer care and healthcare workforce, and work in assorted settings throughout cancer care administrations over practice, administration, research, instruction, policy, administration and leadership [8]. Despite this, the nursing calling faces significant challenges, including workforce shortages, under-investment and under-representation in decision-making.

The recruitment and retention of medical caretakers has been advance affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the onset of the pandemic, there has been expanding turnover intention inside the nursing workforce, attributable to the emotional effect of the pandemic on healthcare specialists, and hierarchical strength and system reactions, including to a deteriorating viewpoint on the worldwide shortage in nurses forecasted earlier to the pandemic[9]. These developments speak to a critical threat to long run of cancer nursing.

Given the dispersal and diversity of cancer nursing parts all through the cancer care health framework, the implications of changing workforces will have a detrimental effect on service delivery, understanding care and patient results. Meaningful system and policy responses to the challenges facing nursing will require important engagement and association of nurses, and really disruptive development over nurture instruction, hone, approach, research and leadership. Besides, ensuring rise to and reliable acknowledgment and esteem of the part and special contributions of the nursing workforce will be crucial. Considering the diversity of nursing parts, horizontally all through the cancer trajectory, and vertically from bedside to leadership, nurses will be integral to the development and usage of development, with parts as influencers, validators and key advisors in healthcare innovation and disruption.

Cancer care is a highly specialised field of nursing practice, which needs a better level of training and competence, past undergrad education. There's consensus that pro education in cancer nursing (and other master areas of nursing) should be competence-based. However, all through Europe, there remains small agreement with respect to the master role of cancer nurses, and the components of education and preparing which are required for specialization and the continued growth of the profession. The implementation of specialised preparing in oncology nursing varies incredibly between eastern and western Europe. European Oncology Nursing Society. Economic and phonetic disparities all through the European locale display encourage barriers to pro instruction, hindering versatility and get to pro training given inside the European locale. Moreover, a need of cross-recognition of professional registrations between nations inside Europe makes extra barriers for those who wish to undertake master clinical programs in oncology in nations where they are available.

Conclusion

The affect and legacy of the COVID-19 pandemic have made significant challenges for the nursing workforce, taking after noteworthy advancement and advancement in cancer nursing parts and recognition. As we see to the future for cancer nursing, we must combine and use learning from the widespread, coordination the achievements in movement of cancer nursing and the spirit of disturbance and innovation inside healthcare which has been sparked by the pandemic [10]. While we argue for the proceeded advancement of cancer nursing; the center must move to addressing disparities within the part recognition and get to master education all through Europe and globally. Association, trade of learning and co-design will be central to progressing instruction, prove and approach to support shifts in recognition of cancer nursing, back development within the cancer nursing workforce and embed cancer medical caretakers in policy setting at local, national and international levels. To realize this vision for cancer nursing; we propose that disruption is required to move the status quo, and ensure that activities which look for to construct nursing capacity in instruction, inquire about, policy and hone settings are relevant and touchy to diversity inside the nursing workforce, and the patients, families and communities they serve.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement

None

1. Andermann A (2016) Taking action on the social determinants of health in clinical practice: a framework for health professionals. CMAJ 188: E474–483.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Dubowitz H, Lane WG, Semiatin JN, Magder LS (2012) The SEEK model of pediatric primary care: can child maltreatment be prevented in a low-risk population. Acad Pediatr 12: 259–268.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Uwemedimo OT, May H (2018) Disparities in utilization of social determinants of health referrals among children in immigrant families. Front Pediatr 6: 207.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Colvin JD, Bettenhausen JL, Anderson-Carpenter KD (2016) Multiple behavior change intervention to improve detection of unmet social needs and resulting resource referrals. Acad Pediatr 16: 168–174.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Cherpitel CJ, Ye Y, Stockwell T, Vallance K, Chow C (2018) Recall bias across 7 days in self-reported alcohol consumption prior to injury among emergency department patients. Drug Alcohol Rev 37: 382–388.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Feinberg E, Smith MV, Naik R (2009) ethnically diverse mothers’ views on the acceptability of screening for maternal depressive symptoms during pediatric well-child visits. J Health Care Poor Underserved 20: 780–797.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Kho ME (2011) Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 8: 98.

Indexed at , Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Janssen I, Leblanc AG (2010) Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 7: 40.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Sloan RA, Sawada SS, Martin CK (2009) Associations between cardiorespiratory fitness and health-related quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7: 47.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Badr H, Chandra J, Paxton RJ (2013) Health-related quality of life, lifestyle behaviors, and intervention preferences of survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surv 7: 523–534.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref