Journal of Infectious Diseases & Therapy
Open Access

Reaching the global malaria elimination goal by 2030 faces many challenges in the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS). Myanmar remains the country with the highest malaria burden in the GMS linked with the high prevalence of artemisinin partial resistance associated with PfKelch13 mutations alongside persistent transmission of malaria [1]. Egger , et al., in their recent publication in the “American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene” highlighted the temporal dynamics of subclinical malaria in low endemic areas of Myanmar.

The Authors discussed the role of ultrasensitive Polymerase Chain Reaction (usPCR) in detecting low-density infections compared to the conventional Rapid Diagnostic Tests (cRDT) in the study cohort, their evidence suggested a more or less similar transmission pattern of subclinical, low-density malaria amid temporal dynamics in three epidemiologically distinct sites particularly among older age groups, those with significant outdoor exposure and travellers [2].

Subclinical malaria

usPCR is a novel diagnostic tool which was able to identify the dominance of P. vivax compared to P. falciparum (6% vs. 1.5%) at the cross-sectional time point, and was able to identify the significant reservoir of subclinical malaria which is left undetected by standard cRDTs. The Limit of Detection (LOD) of usPCR is approximately 16 parasites/mL for P. falciparum and 49.5 copies/mL for P. vivax, more than 5,000-fold more sensitive than cRDT. The authors confirmed that blood samples could be collected by trained village volunteers using Dry Blood Spot (DBS) without any cold chain requirement. Still the field applicability of advanced molecular laboratory methods in resource poor settings remains unresolved [3]. A systematic review of 18 studies in 2022 revealed that the pool prevalence of malaria in asymptomatic populations was 46% higher using a hsRDT compared to a cRDT, although that varied by concentration and parasite density in the peripheral blood. The hsRDT had a higher sensitivity (64.1%) compared to microscopy and cRDT (59% and 53.8% respectively) [4]. hsRDT is a reliable, low cost, point-of-care test which detects asymptomatic infections in targeted populations [5]. t (< $1.00 USD), uses uncomplicated technology, portable testing and provides immediate results [6].

Cross-border infections

The article importantly included the border areas of Myanmar, China, and India as study sites. Without addressing the cross-border problem, malaria elimination in the GMS will not be possible by 2030. In this connection, China has piloted and successfully implemented a 3+1 strategy to reduce border malaria between Myanmar and Yingjian County of China [7]. In recent years, conflict affected sites with a high degree of internal displacement have become a focus of persistence of subclinical malaria which could lead to outbreaks in hot spots along border areas [8]. An integrated approach is needed to malaria surveillance and control through strong political leadership leading to collaborative activities including epidemiological data sharing along border regions, joint vector control, foci management and capacity building. Further implementation research is needed to gain insight on how effective partnership driven strategies can combat cross border malaria particularly aimed at strengthening the active surveillance system and the notification of the movement of cases along the borders [9].

Attention to P. vivax

The article identifies P. vivax as the dominant species compared to P. falciparum (6.0% vs. 1.5%). P. vivax has particular challenges to control measures. Pregnant women and children are particularly vulnerable to the adverse consequences of vivax malaria. A higher risk of P. vivax infections was found following the treatment of P. falciparum, leading to relapse [10]. From 1995 to 2016, P. vivax became the leading cause of malaria infection along the Thailand -Myanmar border [11]. Radical cure of P. vivax is the primary solution; however treatment adherence to the 14-day primaquine regimen is the major challenge in the community [12]. Directly-Observed Therapy (DOT) proved to prevent relapse of P. vivax within the 90-day period following treatment. Glucose 6- Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency plays a critical role in the use of primaquine for radical cure [13]. The high prevalence of G6PD deficiency is preventing primaquine use. G6PD deficiency is prevalent in 10% of Chin and Rakhine national groups and 20% of the ethnic populations in upper Myanmar [14,15]. Reduction of P. vivax malaria needs to be addressed by strong support of G6PD testing among the national groups [16]. A costeffectiveness analysis of the use of G6PD testing has shown reduction of recurrences and a lower risk of haemolytic anaemia in G6PD deficiency patients at low cost [15,17].

Identifying high risk group and their locations (hot spots) by applying the practical use of point-of-care diagnostics is vital for eliminating residual malaria. Adequate supplies of commodities are critical. Strengthening the malaria surveillance system is a challenge for resource limited scenarios, especially for low transmission settings in Myanmar. Innovative intervention strategies are required to fight against malaria particularly for conflict affected areas and point-ofcare testing is critical for detecting subclinical malaria. Despite their limited temperature stability and shorter shelf-life, hsRDT could be capable of detecting subclinical malaria for a focal test and treat approach to targeted populations in low transmission setting. Demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of HS-RDT is challenging for resource limited national programs in reaching vulnerable populations under difficult circumstances, when targeting malaria elimination by 2030.

Both authors have conceptualized, wrote this Short Commentary, reviewed and approved for publication.

Authors would like to acknowledge the support for proofreading by Prudence Hamade, Senior Technical Advisor (UK), Malaria Consortium, London.

1. World Health Organization (2022) World Malaria Report 2022. Geneva, Switzerland.
2. World Health Organization (2015) Strategy for malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong Subregion: 2015-2030. Geneva, Switzerland.
3. O’Flaherty K, Oo WH, Zaloumis SG, Cutts JC, Aung KZ, et al. (2021) Community-based molecular and serological surveillance of subclinical malaria in Myanmar. BMC Med 19: 121.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

4. Slater HC, Ding XC, Knudson S, Bridges DJ, Moonga H, et al. (2022) Performance and utility of more highly sensitive malaria rapid diagnostic tests. BMC Infect Dis 22: 121.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

5. Vásquez AM, Vélez G, Medina A, Serra-Casas E, Campillo A, et al. (2020) Evaluation of highly sensitive diagnostic tools for the detection of P. falciparum in pregnant women attending antenatal care visits in Colombia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 20: 440.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

6. Campillo A, Daily J, González IJ (2017) International survey to identify diagnostic needs to support malaria elimination: guiding the development of combination highly sensitive rapid diagnostic tests. Malaria J 16: 385.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

7. Narain J, Dawa N, Elo O (2022) Eliminating malaria, tuberculosis & HIV/AIDS in South-East Asia: Why cross-border is so critical. Indian J Med Res 156: 368-371.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

8. Zu-rui L, Shi-Gang L, Xiao-Dong S, Xiang-Rui G, Zheng Z, et al. (2021) Effectiveness of joint 3 + 1 malaria strategy along China-Myanmar cross border areas. BMC Infect Dis 21: 1246.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

9. Fambirai T, Chimbari MJ, Ndarukwa P. Global cross-border malaria control collaborative initiatives: A scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19: 12216.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

10. Phyo AP, Dahal P, Mayxay M, Ashley EA (2022) Clinical impact of vivax malaria: A collection review. PLoS Med 19: e1003890.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

11. Hossain MS, Commons RJ, Douglas NM, Thriemer K, Alemayehu BH, et al. (2020) The risk of Plasmodium vivax parasitaemia after P. falciparum malaria: An individual patient data meta-analysis from the WorldWide antimalarial resistance network. PLoS Med 17: e1003393.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

12. Chu CS, Carrara VI, Parker DM, Proux S, Charunwatthana P, et al. (2020) Declining burden of Plasmodium vivax in a population in northwestern thailand from 1995 to 2016 before comprehensive primaquine prescription for radical cure. Am J Trop Med Hyg 102: 147-150.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

13. Takeuchi R, Lawpoolsri S, Imwong M, Kobayashi J, Kaewkungwal J, et al. (2010) Directly-Observed Therapy (DOT) for the radical 14-day primaquine treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria on the Thai-Myanmar border. Malaria J 9: 308.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

14. Richards AK, Banek K, Mullany LC, Lee CI, Smith L, et al. (2009) Cross-border malaria control for internally displaced persons: observational results from a pilot programme in eastern Burma/Myanmar. Trop Med Int Health 14: 512-521.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

15. Han KT, Han ZY, Aye KH, Wai KT, Thi A, et al. (2021) G6PD deficiency among malaria-infected national groups at the western part of Myanmar with implications for primaquine use in malaria elimination. Trop Med Health 49: 47.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

16. Lee J, Kim TI, Kang JM, Jun H, Lê HG, et al. (2018) Prevalence of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency among malaria patients in Upper Myanmar. BMC Infect Dis 18: 131.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

17. Devine A, Parmiter M, Chu CS, Bancone G, Nosten F, et al. (2017) Using G6PD tests to enable the safe treatment of Plasmodium vivax infections with primaquine on the Thailand-Myanmar border: A cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11: e0005602.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]