Global Journal of Nursing & Forensic Studies
Open Access

Forensic Psychology, Forensic Nursing, Psychological Assessment, Trauma-Informed Care

Introduction

Forensic psychology in nursing is a critical subfield within the broader discipline of forensic nursing, focusing specifically on the intersection of psychology, healthcare, and the law. Nurses trained in forensic psychology engage with patients who have encountered the criminal justice system—either as victims or perpetrators of crime. These nurses provide a unique blend of clinical care and psychological assessments, offering crucial insights into the mental and emotional well-being of individuals involved in legal matters [1, 3].

The application of forensic psychology within nursing practice is wide-ranging. It can involve conducting mental health evaluations for those involved in criminal proceedings, assessing the psychological impact of trauma on victims, providing therapeutic support to individuals with psychological disorders, and assisting in determining an individual’s fitness to stand trial. These professionals also serve as expert witnesses in court, interpreting psychological evaluations and supporting the legal process with their specialized knowledge.

This research paper aims to explore the role of forensic psychology in nursing, its clinical applications, the methodologies used in psychological assessments, and the ethical challenges nurses face when integrating psychological practices into legal contexts [4].

The Role of Forensic Psychology in Nursing

Psychological Assessment in Forensic Nursing

One of the primary responsibilities of forensic nurses working in psychology is conducting psychological assessments. These assessments are vital in understanding the mental health conditions of individuals involved in criminal cases. Forensic nurses assess mental health for various reasons, including:

Competency to Stand Trial: Nurses with expertise in forensic psychology can evaluate whether a defendant is mentally competent to stand trial. This evaluation typically involves assessing the individual's cognitive functioning, decision-making ability, and understanding of the legal process [5].

Mental State at the Time of Offense: Forensic nurses may assess whether an individual was suffering from a psychological disorder that could have affected their behaviour at the time of committing a crime. This is a crucial component in cases where insanity pleas or diminished responsibility are involved.

Risk Assessments: Forensic nurses also assess the likelihood that an individual may commit future acts of violence. This is important in determining appropriate sentencing or the need for psychiatric care and rehabilitation.

Victim Psychological Assessments: Forensic nurses assess the psychological impact of crime on victims. They document trauma, emotional distress, and psychological disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or depression, which are common in cases of abuse, sexual assault, or homicide [6-8].

Therapeutic Intervention and Support

Forensic nurses play a significant role in providing therapeutic interventions to both victims and perpetrators of crime. They deliver trauma-informed care, which emphasizes understanding and addressing the emotional, psychological, and physical consequences of trauma. Forensic nurses use psychological principles to help patients cope with the emotional aftermath of crime and violence, offering counselling, crisis intervention, and therapeutic support.

In the case of offenders, forensic nurses may be involved in rehabilitative care for individuals with psychological disorders that contribute to criminal behaviour. This can include medication management for psychiatric conditions, psychotherapy, and facilitating rehabilitation programs aimed at reducing recidivism. Nurses in forensic psychology often work in correctional settings, psychiatric hospitals, or rehabilitation centers, providing care for patients with mental health needs.

Expert Testimony in Legal Proceedings

Forensic nurses with expertise in psychology are often called upon as expert witnesses in legal cases. In these roles, they provide testimony on issues such as:

The mental health status of the accused at the time of the crime.

The emotional and psychological impact on victims.

Whether an individual meets criterion for mental illness, insanity, or competency to stand trial.

The effectiveness of treatment programs for offenders with psychiatric conditions.

Expert testimony in court is a critical component of the justice process, as it helps judges and juries understand the psychological dynamics at play in a case. Forensic nurses must be able to communicate their findings clearly, ensuring that their expertise is accessible to a legal audience.

Methodologies in Forensic Psychological Assessments

Forensic nurses use a variety of psychological tools and methods to conduct assessments. These may include:

Structured Interviews: These interviews are designed to gather detailed information about an individual's mental health history, symptoms, and behaviours. Standardized instruments such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or the Mental Status Exam (MSE) are often used [9].

Psychological Testing: Nurses may administer psychological tests to assess cognitive functioning, personality disorders, and mental health conditions. Tests such as the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) or the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) are commonly used in forensic psychology.

Risk Assessment Tools: In cases where there is concern about the risk of future violence or harm, forensic nurses use risk assessment tools to evaluate an individual's likelihood of re-offending. These assessments are typically used in sentencing, parole hearings, or civil commitments.

Trauma-Specific Assessments: Forensic nurses often use trauma-specific tools to assess the emotional impact of abuse or violence on victims. Instruments like the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) are used to identify symptoms of PTSD in survivors of violent crimes.

Ethical Challenges in Forensic Psychology and Nursing

The integration of psychology and nursing in forensic settings raises several ethical dilemmas. Nurses must balance their responsibilities as healthcare providers with their role as potential witnesses in legal cases. Some of the key ethical issues include:

Confidentiality vs. Legal Obligation

Forensic nurses must navigate the tension between maintaining patient confidentiality and their legal obligations to report findings to law enforcement or the courts. In certain cases, especially when dealing with victims of abuse or violence, nurses may be required to disclose sensitive information without patient consent. This raises questions about patient autonomy and the right to privacy.

Dual Roles

Forensic nurses often face the ethical challenge of balancing their clinical responsibilities with their legal obligations. Their primary duty is to provide care to patients, but they may also be required to participate in legal proceedings, which can place them in an uncomfortable position. Ensuring that they do not compromise their objectivity or their professional role is essential.

Competence and Scope of Practice

Given the specialized nature of forensic psychology, nurses must ensure they possess the necessary expertise to conduct psychological assessments. There is a fine line between performing tasks within their scope of practice and venturing into areas that require specialized training. Forensic nurses must adhere to professional guidelines and avoid overstepping their bounds in complex psychological evaluations [10].

Conclusion

Forensic psychology in nursing is a vital, interdisciplinary field that provides essential support to both the criminal justice system and healthcare. Forensic nurses trained in psychology are integral to assessing and treating individuals involved in criminal cases, providing psychological evaluations, and ensuring that victims and offenders receive appropriate care. The ability to conduct mental health assessments, provide therapeutic interventions, and offer expert testimony makes forensic nurses crucial players in the healthcare-legal interface.

As forensic nursing continues to evolve, it will be essential for nurses to stay informed about ethical standards, legal obligations, and advancements in psychological practice. Interdisciplinary collaboration between nurses, psychologists, law enforcement, and legal professionals is critical to ensuring that the complex psychological needs of victims and offenders are met, and that justice is served in a fair and compassionate manner.

1. Wiebe S, Guyatt G, Weaver B, Matijevic S, Sidwell C (2003) Comparative responsiveness of generic and specific quality-of-life instruments. J Clin Epidemiol 56:52-60.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Finn R H (1972) Effects of some variations in rating scale characteristics on the means and reliabilities of ratings. Educ Psychol Meas 32:255-265.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Simkovic M, Trauble B (2019) Robustness of statistical methods when measure is affected by ceiling and/or floor effect. 14: e0220889.

Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Harpe S E (2015) How to analyze like art and other rating scale data. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 7: 836-850.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP (1985) Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J R Coll Gen Pract 35: 185-188.

Google Scholar

6. Devlin N, Parkin D, Janssen B (2020) Analysis of EQ-5D Profiles. In: Methods for Analyzing and Reporting EQ-5D.

Google Scholar

7. Redaelli A, Stephens JM, Laskin BL (2003) The burden and outcomes associated with four leukemia’s: AML, ALL, CLL, and CML. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 3: 311-329.

Google Scholar

8. De Haan R, Horn J, Limburg M (1993) A comparison of five stroke scales with measures of disability, handicap, and quality of life. Stroke 24: 1178-1181.

Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Duncan, Pamela W (1997) Stroke Recovery. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 4: 51-58.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Essink-Bot ML, Krabbe PF, Bonsel GJ, Aaronson NK (1997) An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument. Med Care 35: 522-537.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref