Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production
Open Access

Gillnet; Megafauna species; Turtles; Ghost fishing

Introduction

Gillnet is a wall of netting which hangs vertically with inside the water column with weights alongside the lowest and floats alongside the top, intercepting fish as they circulate round on fishing grounds. In principle, gillnet is an invisible panel of mesh that fish swim into without noticing [1]. Once with inside the mesh, fish are regularly stuck in the back of the gill cowl and can’t again out, as a result the term “gillnet”. The gillnet fishery with inside the Northwest Atlantic may be dated again to the mid-1800s. In the early days gillnets had been built of herbal fiber which include cotton. The invention of artificial substances and their software in fishing nets with inside the Fifties and Sixties may be taken into consideration a revolution in fishing tools technology [2]. During the Sixties, maximum herbal fiber gillnet substances had been changed with the aid of using artificial fiber with inside the Western global because of the big capture growth and the nearly maintenanceloose nature of the material.

Classification and Description

The Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations classifies fishing tools into 9 primary kinds plus miscellaneous gears. Each of the 9 tools kinds is in addition divided into sub-kinds [3]. Gillnets and entangling nets are blended into one tools kind with 5 sub-kinds and miscellaneous kinds. Set gillnets and driftnets are main sub-kinds on this category. Ground fish gillnets used with inside the Northwest Atlantic is taken into consideration “set gillnets”.

Set gillnets

Set gillnets are anchored or weighted to the lowest and are notably stationery. They are truly referred to as “gillnets” in Japanese Canada and the north-eastern United States. A regular ground fish gillnet is ninety one m long, with mesh sizes starting from one hundred forty to 203 mm [4]. Larger mesh sizes of more than 305 mm are used for skates and monkfish. Set gillnets are set on the lowest for floor fish species, and midwinter or close to the floor for pelagic species which include salmon, herring and tuna.

Drift gillnets

Drift gillnets also are referred to as driftnets. These nets aren’t constant to the lowest and actually float with the current, catching fish whilst drifting. Driftnets can be tied to the vessel which additionally drifts with currents considering that it’s far tough to anchor floor gillnets in deep waters [5]. Driftnets are typically utilized in excessive sea fisheries, which include oceanic squid, tuna and salmon. High sea driftnet fisheries are distinctly industrialized and big in scale.

Trammel nets

There are 3 layers of nets in a trammel internet. The center internet has a smaller mesh length whilst the nets on facets have large mesh sizes. Fish swimming into the internet push the small mesh internet thru the big mesh netting; this bureaucracy a pocket wherein the fish is trapped and retained.

Fixed gillnets

In tidal and shallow water areas, gillnets can be hung onto stakes to shape a wall or “fence”. This is specifically powerful in rivers wherein sturdy currents could distort the geometry of a normally built gillnet.

Combination gillnets

Gillnet webbing of various mesh sizes can be rigged collectively to shape one gillnet to goal unique species and sizes in blended fisheries. Gillnets and trammel nets can be blended to obtain the equal effect [6]. Combined gillnets are regularly used as sampling gears for useful resource surveys and for analysing selectivity of gillnets of various substances and constructions.

Anatomy of a Gillnet

A gillnet is a sheet of webbing bolstered with the aid of using body ropes, with floats and weights affixed to enlarge the net with inside the vertical direction. Multiple gillnets are normally tied stop to-stop to shape a string of nets this is fished as a unmarried piece of tools [7]. Ropes are connected to the stop gillnets to facilitate retrieval. Buoys and highflyers are used to become aware of places of both stop of the string. An artist’s influence of a hard and fast gillnet is proven, with the main additives classified with inside the inset.

Selectivity of Gillnets

The choice of fish with the aid of using a tools is the “technique which reasons the capture of the tools to have a unique composition to that of the population” with inside the area. Selectivity is the quantitative evaluation of this option technique primarily based totally on organic sampling received with inside the field. Gillnet selectivity processes, mechanisms, and analyses are reviewed [8]. There are primary shapes which constitute selectivity curves for fishing gears: sigmoid and bellshaped curves. Gillnet selectivity curves are commonly bell-formed and might have or greater peaks reflecting unique approach of capture [9]. Gillnet selectivity is commonly defined with the aid of using the modal length, the choice variety, and the choice thing that is the ratio of L0 to mesh length. Several elements have an effect on selectivity of gillnets, which includes mesh length, webbing material, putting ratio, and wire length.

Mesh size

Mesh length is the maximum crucial element figuring out gillnets selectivity. Larger meshes normally trap large fish for all species. While surveying younger cod in Greenland waters, observed that greater cod had been stuck via way of means of gilling as mesh length became elevated [10]. Size distribution became modified from no conspicuous peaks, to 2 peaks, to a unmarried height as mesh length became elevated from 33 to sixty six mm (1.3” to 2.6”) [11]. Comparing gillnets of a hundred and eighty and 220 mm mesh sizes with inside the Barents Sea for Greenland halibut, the version period became fifty five cm for the smaller mesh length as compared with sixty six cm for the massive mesh length. Regulating mesh length to lessen undersized fish has been a not unusual place control degree in lots of fisheries. In the New England multispecies gillnet fishery, the minimal mesh length is a hundred sixty five mm.

Webbing Material Generally speaking, smaller twines have negative length selective belongings (large choice variety) because of elongations whilst a fish forces thru the mesh, and less difficult entanglements which bring about a much wider length of fish being stuck. A monofilament gillnet has a higher selective belongings for cod than each multifilament and multimonofilament nets due to the fact monofilament twines are greater inflexible than each multifilament and multi-monofilament twines [12]. A large percent of fish are gilled in monofilament gillnets than nets product of multifilament and multimonofilament, which generally tend to bring about tangling. Hanging Ratio Slackly-hung gillnets with low putting ratios bring about greater fish being entangled as opposed to gilled, which leads to negative length selectivity. When reading tilapia, Hamley received a length variety of 18 to 23 cm in a tightly hung net, however eight to 22 cm in a slackly hung net [13]. Species Selection and Bycatch Reduction Gillnets have negative species selective properties, catching a huge variety of species. Primary measures to lessen bycatch species and undersized fish are the usage of appropriate mesh sizes and fishing at decided on locations. Use of tie-down nets or nets with much less meshes with inside the vertical route decreased trap of cod and spiny dogfish without discount in flounder trap. A gillnet layout with Norsel traces to elevate the internet 0.5 m above the seabed decreased bycatch of purple king crab, however additionally decreased focused cod.

Comparison with other fishing gears

Gillnets normally trap massive fish as compared to different gears, if the right mesh length and netting substances are used. Several comparative fishing trials have indicated higher length selectivity for gillnets than for different fishing gears. When fished concurrently at the west coast of Greenland, gillnets stuck greater massive Greenland halibut than long-lines [14]. Even aleven though each gears stuck fish of the equal height period of approximately 70 cm and had a comparable period variety of forty five to one hundred fifteen cm, long-lines stuck a bigger percentage of fish among 50 and sixty five cm, whilst gillnets stuck a bigger percentage of fish among sixty five and eighty five cm. Cod at the Flemish Cap are fished via way of means of numerous fishing fleet sectors the usage of trawls, gillnets and long-lines. Seven fleet sectors as diagnosed via way of means of equipment and via way of means of country [15]. Average weight of cod stuck via way of means of distinct fleet sectors and their percentage of the cod trap in 1991 is proven. The Portuguese gillnetters stuck the biggest cod with a median weight of 2.five kg, whilst the Spanish freezer trawlers stuck the smallest cod with a median weight of 0.4 kg. Lowry et al. as compared gillnets and trawls with the equal mesh sizes starting from one hundred and five to one hundred thirty mm focused on Baltic cod, and observed that gillnets stuck fish with height lengths 7 to sixteen cm longer than fish stuck with trawls the usage of the equal mesh length. Nedreaas and Huse as compared 220 mm mesh length gillnets with a one hundred thirty five mm codend mesh length trawl and #12/zero EZbaiter hook long-line focused on Greenland halibut with inside the Barents Sea off northern Norway. They observed gillnet catches had been composed of usually mature ladies of massive length whilst the trawl and long line had a miles decrease percent of massive mature ladies [16]. The common period of gillnet fish became 65.9 cm, whilst the long line stuck fish became 59.6 cm and the trawled fish became 50.1 cm. Comparison of 3 equipment kinds focused on cod and haddock additionally confirmed comparable results.

Conclusion

The gillnet is a completely length selective fishing equipment, touchdown best a slim variety of fish sizes. Size selectivity is carefully associated with mesh length, and adjustments with form of webbing material, wire length, and putting ratio. There is conservation demanding situations going through the gillnet fisheries: 1) species selectivity consisting of bycatch of marine mammals, sea birds and turtles, and 2) ghost fishing of misplaced fishing gears. Research to mitigate conservation demanding situations has proven progress, however greater paintings is needed.

1. Angelsen KK (1981) Engineering and fish reaction aspects of gillnetting-a review. ICES CM B: 34.

Google Scholar

2. Angelsen KK, Haugen K, Floen S (1979) The catching efficiency of cod gillnets with different hanging ratio (E) and different floatline buoyancy. ICES CM B: 19.

Google Scholar

3. Anon (1993) Biodegradable fishing nets. World Fishing.
4. Baranov FI (1948) Thoery and assessment of fishing gear. Pishchepromizdat, Moscow. (Translated from Russian by the Ontario Department of Lands and Forests).
5. Boje J (1991) A comparison of selectivity in longlines and gillnets in the fishery for Greenland halibut in West of Greenland. NAFO SCR Doc 39.

Google Scholar

6. Breen PA (1990) A review of host fishing by traps and gillnets. Proc.2nd Int. Conf. Marine Debris 2-7 April 1989 Hawaii. NOAA Tech. Memo 154: 571-599.

Google Scholar

7. Brothers G, Yetman L (1982) A study to determine the impact of mesh size on the redfish catches 1981. DFO NFLD Industrial development Branch 06: 5.
8. Carr HA, Cooper RA (1988) Manned submersible and ROV assessment of ghost gillnets in the Gulf of Maine. IEEE proceedings 622-625.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

9. Carr HA, Amaral EA, Hulbert AW, Cooper R (1985) Underwater Survey of simulated lost demersal and lost commercial gill nets off new england. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS 54.

Google Scholar

10. Carr HA, Blott AJ, Caruso PG (1992) A study of ghost gillnets in the inshore waters of southern New England. Proceedings of MTS ’92 Conference 361-367.

Google Scholar

11. Carretta JV, Price T, Peterson D, Read R (2005) Estimates of marine mammal, sea turtle, and seabird mortality in the California drift gillnet fishery for swordfish and thresher shark, 1996–2002. Mar Fish Rev 66:21-25.

Google Scholar, Indexed at

12. CFCL (1994) Review of Fishing Gear and Harvesting technology in Atlantic Canada. A Report prepared for Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Fishing Industry Services Branch, Fishing Operations, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Canadian Fisheries Consultants Ltd. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Google Scholar

13. Cooper RA, Carr HA, Hulbert AH (1988) Manned submersible and ROV assessment of ghost gillnets on Jefferies and Stellwagen Banks, Gulf of Maine. NOAA Undersea Research Program Research Report. 88-4.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

14. Collins JJ (1979) Relative efficiency of multifilament and monofilament nylon gillnet towards lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) in Lake Huron. J Fish Res Bd Can. 36:1180-1185.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

15. Cox TM, Read AJ (2004) Echolocation behavior of harbor porpoise Phocoena phocoena around chemically enhanced gill nets. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 279:275-282.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

16. de Cardenas E, Lassen H (1993) Effects of mesh size changes in the Flemish Cap cod fisheries. NAFO SCR Doc 67.