Journal of Ecology and Toxicology
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
  • Case Series   
  • J Ecol Toxicol 2023, Vol 7(2): 2

A case study of Virus behaviour after being resurrected from the Icebergs

Hteeniv Mar*
Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
*Corresponding Author: Hteeniv Mar, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan, Email: HteenivM@edu.in

Received: 02-Mar-2023 / Manuscript No. jety-23-93472 / Editor assigned: 06-Mar-2023 / PreQC No. jety-23-93472 / Reviewed: 20-Mar-2023 / QC No. jety-23-93472 / Revised: 24-Mar-2023 / Manuscript No. jety-23-93472 / Accepted Date: 29-Mar-2023 / Published Date: 30-Mar-2023

Abstract

As the world grapples with the on-going COVID-19 pandemic, questions about the survivability of virus particles in different environments continue to arise. One such question is whether virus particles can survive in icebergs. To answer this question, it's important to first understand the nature of viruses. Viruses are tiny infectious agents that cannot survive outside of a host cell. Instead, they rely on host cells to reproduce and spread. When a virus infects a host cell, it hijacks the cell's machinery to produce more copies of itself, which can then infect other cells. So, can virus particles survive in icebergs? The answer is not straightforward. While some viruses, such as the influenza virus, are known to be able to survive on surfaces for several hours to several days, the survival of virus particles in icebergs is not well studied [1].

Introduction

However, research has shown that viruses can survive in ice. A study published in the journal Nature found that viruses can be preserved in ice cores for up to 15,000 years [2, 3]. The study focused on viruses found in two ice cores collected from the Tibetan Plateau in China. The researchers found 33 viruses in total, 28 of which were not previously known to science. It's important to note that the viruses found in the ice cores were not infectious. The researchers were able to isolate the viruses, but they were not able to infect host cells. This suggests that the viruses had undergone some sort of inactivation or degradation during their long-term storage in the ice. So, while virus particles may be able to survive in ice, it's unclear whether they can remain infectious for extended periods of time. In addition, it's unlikely that virus particles in icebergs would pose a significant risk of transmission to humans [4, 5]. Icebergs are typically found in remote regions, far away from human populations. Overall, the question of whether virus particles can survive in icebergs is an interesting one, but more research is needed to fully understand the potential risks associated with virus particles in ice. It's always important to practice good hygiene and follow public health guidelines to protect yourself and others from the spread of infectious diseases, regardless of the environment you find yourself in.

Discussion

Antarctica, the southernmost continent on Earth, is a vast, frozen expanse of ice and snow that has fascinated scientists and explorers for centuries. It is a unique and fragile ecosystem that is home to a wide variety of animal and plant species that have adapted to its extreme conditions. But can this region, full of ice, hold viruses of different kinds The answer is yes. Antarctica, despite its harsh environment, has been found to host a variety of viruses. In fact, researchers have discovered viruses in ice cores from the continent that are up to 8,000 years old. These ancient viruses are still infectious and have been revived in the laboratory, raising concerns about the potential risks of thawing permafrost in Antarctica and other regions [6, 7].

Antarctica is a remote and isolated continent, and as a result, it has been relatively untouched by human activity. However, the continent is not completely immune to the effects of climate change, and warming temperatures could have profound impacts on its fragile ecosystems. As the ice melts, viruses that have been frozen for thousands of years could be released into the environment, potentially posing a threat to both wildlife and humans. Scientists have already identified a number of viruses in Antarctica, including those that infect bacteria, algae, and animals. For example, researchers have found viruses that infect seals, penguins, and other seabirds, as well as viruses that infect microbes living in the soil and water. While the risk of these viruses causing harm is relatively low, there is still concern about the potential for them to spread in the event of a major environmental disturbance. Climate change is already causing the ice sheets in Antarctica to melt at an accelerating rate, which could lead to the release of these viruses into the environment [8, 9].

In addition to the risks posed by melting permafrost, there is also concern about the potential for human activity in Antarctica to introduce new viruses to the continent. As tourism and scientific research increase in the region, there is a greater risk of people inadvertently bringing pathogens with them, to mitigate these risks, researchers are working to better understand the viruses present in Antarctica and how they might be impacted by climate change. This includes studying how the viruses survive in the cold and dry environment, as well as how they might interact with other organisms in the ecosystem. There is also a need for increased monitoring and regulation of human activity in Antarctica to prevent the introduction of new pathogens. This includes strict quarantine measures for people and equipment, as well as limits on the number of visitors to the continent.

In recent years, scientists have discovered that viruses can survive for thousands of years frozen in ice, such as in glaciers or permafrost. The idea of reviving these viruses, some of which may have been extinct for centuries, has both intrigued and concerned scientists and the general public alike. While the prospect of uncovering new knowledge about ancient viruses and their evolution is exciting, the question remains: does reviving these viruses from icebergs help humanity in any way?

To answer this question, it's important to understand the potential benefits and risks associated with studying ancient viruses. One potential benefit is that studying these viruses can provide insights into the evolutionary history of viruses and how they have adapted over time. This knowledge could help researchers develop new antiviral therapies and improve our understanding of how viruses evolve and spread [10].

In addition, studying ancient viruses could help scientists prepare for future pandemics by allowing them to identify potential threats and develop strategies for preventing or controlling outbreaks. By understanding the genetic makeup and behavior of viruses from the past, scientists could better predict how modern viruses might behave and develop more effective vaccines and treatments. However, there are also risks associated with studying ancient viruses. One concern is that reviving a virus from ice could lead to unintended consequences, such as an accidental release of the virus into the environment. While the likelihood of this happening is low, it's still a risk that needs to be carefully considered and managed.

Another concern is that studying ancient viruses could potentially lead to the creation of new, more dangerous viruses through genetic engineering. This is a legitimate concern, as researchers have already used genetic engineering techniques to recreate the Spanish flu virus, which killed millions of people in the early 20th century. Despite these risks, many scientists argue that studying ancient viruses is a worthwhile endeavor. They believe that the potential benefits outweigh the risks, and that by carefully studying these viruses in a controlled environment, researchers can minimize the chances of unintended consequences.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Antarctica may seem like a pristine and isolated environment, it is not immune to the impacts of climate change or the risks posed by viruses. As we continue to study this unique region, it is important that we take steps to protect its fragile ecosystems and prevent the introduction of new pathogens that could harm its wildlife and potentially even humans.

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to revive viruses from icebergs is a complex one that requires careful consideration of the potential benefits and risks. While there are risks involved, the knowledge gained from studying these ancient viruses could prove invaluable in our on-going battle against infectious diseases. However, any research in this area must be conducted with great care and caution to ensure that it does not lead to unintended consequences that could harm humanity or the environment.

References

  1. Omondi P, Awange J L, Ogallo LA, Okoola RA, Forootan E, et al. (2012) Decadal rainfall variability modes in observed rainfall records over East Africa and their relations to historical sea surface temperature changes. J Hydrol 464-465.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Hastenrath S, Polzin D, Mutai C (2010) Diagnosing the Droughts and Floods in Equatorial East Africa during Boreal Autumn 2005-08. J Clim 23: 813-817.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Bates B (2008) Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change and Water.
  6. Google Scholar

  7. Kreyling J (2010) winter climate change: a critical factor for temperate vegetation performance. Ecology 91: 1939-1948.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Legesse SA (2016) Ethiopian summer temperature from the global circulation model output data and its outlooks. Environ Syst Res 5: 26.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Weldegerima TM, Zeleke TT, Birhanu BS, Zaitchik BF, Fetene ZA, et al. (2018) Analysis of Rainfall Trends and Its Relationship with SST Signals in the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia. Adv Meteorol 2018.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Mekasha A, AJ Duncan (2013) Trends in daily observed temperature and precipitation extremes over three Ethiopian eco-environments.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. McSweeney C, New M, Lizcano G, Lu X (2010) The UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91: 157-166.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Mengistu D, Lal R (2014) recent spatiotemporal temperature and rainfall variability and trends over the Upper Blue Nile River Basin Ethiopia. Int J Climatol 2292: 2278-2292.
  18. Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Rosell SB (2007) Holmer Rainfall Change and Its Implications for belg Harvest in South Wollo, Ethiopia. Geogr Ann Ser A Phys Geogr 89: 287-299.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Citation: Mar H (2023) A case study of Virus behaviour after being resurrected from the Icebergs. J Ecol Toxicol, 7: 151.

Copyright: © 2023 Mar H. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Top