Journal of Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Open Access
OMICS International organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 58
Journal of Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation received 58 citations as per Google Scholar report
Journal of Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
- Google Scholar
- ICMJE
Useful Links
Share This Page
Journal of Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation : Citations & Metrics Report
Articles published in Journal of Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation have been cited by esteemed scholars and scientists all around the world. Journal of Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation has got h-index 3, which means every article in Journal of Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation has got 3 average citations.
Following are the list of articles that have cited the articles published in Journal of Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation.
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total published articles |
49 | 41 | 30 | 30 | 11 | 11 | 4 | 19 | 0 |
Research, Review articles and Editorials |
46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Research communications, Review communications, Editorial communications, Case reports and Commentary |
34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Conference proceedings |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Citations received as per Google Scholar, other indexing platforms and portals |
46 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 2 |
| Journal total citations count | 58 |
| Journal impact factor | 0.18 |
| Journal 5 years impact factor | 0.30 |
| Journal cite score | 0.24 |
| Journal h-index | 3 |
| Journal h-index since 2019 | 3 |
 |
Chest radiographs of cardiac devices (Part 1): Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices, cardiac valve prostheses and Amplatzer occluder devices |
| View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar | View at Indexing | |
|
Holding area LINQ trial (HALT) |
| View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar | View at Indexing | |
|
Reveal LINQ versus reveal XT implantable loop recorders: intra-and post-procedural comparison |
| View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar | View at Indexing | |
|
Baseline demographics, safety, and patient acceptance of an insertable cardiac monitor for atrial fibrillation screening: the REVEAL-AF Study |
| View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar | View at Indexing | |
|
Real-world comparison of in-hospital Reveal LINQ insertable cardiac monitor insertion inside and outside of the cardiac catheterization or electrophysiology laboratory |
| View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar | View at Indexing | |
|
Insertion of miniaturized cardiac monitors outside the catheter operating room: experience and practical advice |
| View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar | View at Indexing | |
|
Complications after implantation of a new-generation insertable cardiac monitor: results from the LOOP study |
| View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar | View at Indexing | |
|
Performance of the New BioMonitor 2?AF Insertable Cardiac Monitoring System: Can Better be Worse? |
| View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar | View at Indexing | |
|
Current and future use of insertable cardiac monitors |
| View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar | View at Indexing | |
|
Feasibility and safety of Reveal LINQ insertion in a sterile procedure room versus electrophysiology laboratory |
| View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar | View at Indexing | |
|
Feasibility and safety of Reveal LINQ insertion in a sterile procedure room versus electrophysiology laboratory |
| View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar | View at Indexing | |
|
In-office insertion of a miniaturized insertable cardiac monitor: results from the Reveal LINQ In-Office 2 randomized study |
| View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar | View at Indexing | |
|
Holter monitoring and loop recorders: from research to clinical practice |
| View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar | View at Indexing | |
|
The Impact of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar | View at Indexing | |
|
Role of platelet?to?lymphocyte count ratio (PLR), as a prognostic indicator in COVID?19: A systematic review and meta?analysis |
| View at Publisher | View at Google Scholar | View at Indexing | |
