| Research Article |
Open Access |
|
| Molecular Characterization and Phylogenetic Analysis of BZIP
Protein in Plants |
| Dhivya Selvaraj1, Arul Loganathan2and Sathishkumar Ramalingam1* |
| 1Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore -46, India |
| 2Centre for Plant Molecular Biology, Tamilnadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore-46, India |
| *Corresponding author: |
Dr. Sathishkumar R
Molecular Biology Laboratory
Department of Biotechnology
Bharathiar University
Coimbatore-46, India
E-mail: rsathish@buc.edu.in |
|
| |
| Received June 12, 2010; Accepted June 29, 2010; Published June 29, 2010 |
| |
| Citation: Selvaraj D, Loganathan A, Sathishkumar R (2010) Molecular Characterization and Phylogenetic Analysis of BZIP Protein in Plants. J Proteomics Bioinform 3: 230-233. doi:10.4172/jpb.1000144 |
| |
Copyright: © 2010 Selvaraj D, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under
the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and
source are credited. |
| |
| Abstract |
| BZIP are a class of dimeric sequence specific DNA-binding proteins, is bipartite in structure containing region
of enriched basic amino acids which is adjacent to leucine zippers. It is characterized by several leucine residues
regularly spaced at seven amino acid intervals, basic region directly contacts with DNA. The leucine zipper mediates
heterodimerization and homodimerization of protein monomers through parallel interactions which is unique to
eukaryotes. The plant Arabidopsis thaliana genome shows 67 BZIP proteins. We have predicted dimeric properties
of alpha helical leucine zipper and coiled coil structure of BZIP proteins in plants. In this analysis the length of leucine
zippers, placement of asparagines in the hydrophobic interface and presence of interhelical electrostatic interactions
were focused. Phylogenetic tree was also constructed by studying evolutionary relationship of BZIB existing among the
plants. |
| |
| Keywords |
BZIP; Transcription factor; Dimerization; Leucine
zippers; Biophysical properties; Phylogenetic relationship |
| |
| Introduction |
| Growth and development of all organisms depends on respective
gene expression which is mainly controlled by transcription factors.
Transcriptional regulators can be grouped into families of related
proteins (Michel et al., 2001). The basic leucine zipper (BZIP) is
one among the transcriptional regulatory factors that have been
conserved in all eukaryotes. BZIP protein has DNA binding domain
consisting of rich regions of basic amino acids that binds to DNA
and so called leucine zippers. It consists of several heptad repeats of
hydrophobic residues which cause dimerization. BZIP basic region
shows a high degree of sequence similarity with Homo sapiens and
Arabidopsis thaliana and contain two invariant residues of Asparagine
and Arginine. |
| |
| BZIP–DNA complex consists of two α helices lying perpendicular
to the DNA, associated in a coiled coil structure with basic region
contacting a half site in the DNA major groove. The previous study
reveals that BZIP structures shows functional variability of conserved
residues in DNA recognition (Maria et al., 2003). The genome of
Arabidopsis thaliana have been sequenced and annotated. Findings
suggest that BZIP proteins are important for pathogen defense,
light- induced signaling, seed maturation and flower development in
plants (Christopher et al., 2004). BZIP proteins form homodimers and
heterodimers depending on the amino acid sequence of the leucine
zipper (O’Shea et al., 1992). In the previous study of basic region of
EmBp-1, eight or ten conserved residues were found in other leucine
zipper proteins (Guiltinan et al., 1990). |
| |
| Leucine zippers of monomeric BZIP have structural repeats of
two α helical turns and the repeat is termed as heptad, with each
seven positions assigned as a,b,c,d,e,f and g. The positions d, e
and g are near to leucine zipper interface and shows dimerization
specificity. Amino acids in a and d positions are hydrophobic that lies
on same side of the helix. These hydrophobic amino acids interact
interhelically with hydrophobic amino acids in the same a and d
positions of the second α-helix of the leucine zipper that stabilize
the dimerization property of the protein. The Amino acid leucine
has better stabilizing property than other amino acids (Michel et al., 2001) Dimerization specificity is regulated by amino acids in the
a, e and g positions. The charged amino acids present in g and e
positions actively involve in the formation of attractive electrostatic
interhelical interactions. These interactions are denoted as g<->e’
where the prime (‘) indicates a residue on the second α helix of the
dimeric leucine zipper. Oppositely charged amino acid interactions
promote dimerization specificity where as similarly charged amino
acids shows repulsion and thereby inhibiting homodimerization.
BZIP plays an important role in Abscisic Acid (ABA) signaling pathways
in Arabidopsis. Through quantitative RT-PCR, it is analyzed that most
of OsbZIPs were induced by ABA, ACC and abiotic stress. The RTPCR
reveals that rice BZIP has a positive role in drought tolerance
(Lu et al., 2009). Phylogenetic analysis of BZIP protein was done in
algae, mosses, ferns, gymnosperms and angiosperms. The result
suggests that the ancestor of green plants possess four bZIP genes
that actively involved in oxidative stress and also in light-dependent
regulations. (Luiz et al., 2008). |
| |
| In this study, 109 motifs of BZIP in the genome of O.sativa japonica were analyzed by comparing with the model plant Arabidopsis
thaliana and other plants. None of the proteins are homologous to
animal BZIP proteins but they have similar amino acids to regulate
dimerization specificity. BZIP protein sequences from different plant
source like Phaseolus vulgaris, Capsicum annuum, Nicotiana tabacum,
Antirrhinum majus, Hyacinthus orientalis, Malus x domestica,
Phaseolus vulgaris, Triticum aestivum, Vitis vinifera, Glycine max,
Lycopersicon esculentum, Catharanthus roseus, Spinacia oleracea
and Psophocarpus tetragonolobus have been annotated. This analysis reveals that many O. sativa BZIP proteins have longer leucine zippers
like A.thaliana and also shows similar dimerization property which
is specified by attractive and repulsive g<->e’ interactions. Finally
evolutionary relationship were analysed in plants by considering the
BZIP protein. |
| |
| Materials and Methods |
| |
| Data collection |
| The data set of Indica Oryza sativa of BZIP factors were obtained
from the database of rice transcription factors (DART), http://drtf.cbi.pku.edu.cn/. The different plant BZIP factors were obtained from
protein sequence database of National centre for Biotechnology
Information (NCBI), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. |
| |
| Pattern matching |
| The Pattern matching program Motifscan 3Dinsight is an
integrated database and search tool for structure, function and
sequence patterns of biomolecules which is used to identify the BZIP
patterns existing between different plant sources. Two types of query
of regular expressions were used in this database. The basic region
expression [KR]-x (1, 3)-[RKSAQ]-N-{VL}-x-[SAQ] (2)-{L}-[RKTAENQ]-x-
R-{S}-[RK] was found to be same in different plants. The numbers of
motifs observed in the above plants were presented in Table 1. |
| |
| Secondary structure predcitions |
| Protein secondary structural elements were predicted using a
new method called self optimized prediction method (SOPMA), which
accurately predicts 69.5% of amino acid for the three state describing
the secondary structure (α-helix, b-beta sheet and coil). This tool works on the basis of neural network method (PHD) (Geourjon and
Deleage, 1995). |
| |
| Multiple alignment and phylogenetic tree analysis |
| Protein sequences were aligned with Clustal X Program
(Thompson et al., 1997). Phylogenetic relastionship of different Plant
BZIP proteins were analyzed by the neighbour – joining method
(Saitou and Nei, 1987) using Molecular evolutionary Genetic Analyis
tool (MEGA). |
| |
| Results and Discussion |
| |
| Amino acid content and leucine zipper length |
| The interaction of g<->e position is characterized by charged
amino acids like Arginine, serine, lysine, Proline and glycine. Pair
of proline and glycine indicates the C- terminals. The plants like
Antirrhinum majus, Capsicum annuum, Hyacinthus orientalis,
Malus x domestica, Nicotiana tabacum, Phaseolus acutifolius,
Phaseolus vulgaris, Triticum aestivum, Vitis vinifera shows triheptad
repeats; Glycine max, Lycopersicon esculentum Nicotiana tabacum, Psophocarpus tetragonolobus contains tetra repeats; Catharanthus
roseus and Hyacinthus orientalis contains penta heptads; Spinacia
oleracea shows hepta heptads these were shown in the Table 1. The
kind of amino acids found in the a, d, e and g regions of O.sativa are
found to be coiled coil arrangements which are known to regulate
dimerization stability and specificity , as shown in Figure 1. The
number of leucine repeat distribution of BZIP in O.sativa was shown
in the Figure 2. Allocation of Amino acid sequences of the Plants BZIP
Domains were shown in Figure 4. |
| |
|
Figure 1: Pie chart representing the frequency in all the a,b,c,e,f and g positions of the leucine zipper for O.sativa BZIP proteins. 100% of leucine was observed at
d position. |
|
| |
|
Table 1: Various plant BZIP proteins of heptad repeats, amino acid length and distribution of secondary structure elements. |
|
| |
|
Figure 2: BZIP distribution and number of heptad repeats in O.sativa. |
|
| |
| Biophysical analysis shows that how the positions of amino
acids contribute to dimerization specificity. From the present data,
serine(S) in the second position of the heptad interacts with I, N, K
and S at the ‘a’ position. These data indicates that serine contributes
less to dimerization specificity than aliphatic amino acids, polar
asparagines or charged lysine residues. |
| |
| Phylogenetic analysis |
| The evolutionary relationships between the plants were evaluated
by phylogenetic analysis of the aligned amino acids sequence of their
BZIP domain. From the analysis BZIP factor 4 of Nicotiana tabacum is closely related with BZIP of Antirrhinum majus and Lycopersicon
esculentum. The factor ATB2 BZIP of Glycine max is highly similar
with BZIP-2 of Nicotiana tabacum and Capsicum annum. BZIP
factor 2 and 3 is found to be same in Phaseolus vulgaris. Factor 6
of Phaseolus vulgaris is closely related with taxon Triticum aestivum and Vitis vinifera putative ripening-related BZIP and Nicotiana
tabacum. The plant Catharanthus roseus is not related with the
above plants it has BZIP of G BoX Binding protein, shown in the tree
Figure 3. Evolutionary relationships of 23 taxa were inferred using
the Neighbor - Joining method. The optimal tree with the sum of
branch length = 10.69915308 is shown. Phylogenetic analyses were
conducted in MEGA4. |
| |
|
Figure 3: Phylogenetic relations for BZIP proteins in plants. |
|
| |
|
Figure 4: Amino acid sequence of various plants BZIP domains. The leucine zipper region is divided into heptads (a, b, c, d, e, f, g) to help visualize the g?e’ pairs. Amino
acids predicted to regulate dimerization specificity are color coded. If the g and e positions contain charged amino acids, the heptads from g to the following e were colored.
Four colors were used to represent g?e’ pairs. Green is used for the attractive basic-acidic pairs (R? E and K? E), orange is for the attaractive acidic-basic pairs (K?R,
E?K, D?K), red is for repulsive acidic pairs (E?E and E?D), and blue is for repulsive basic pairs (K?K and R?K). The blue color represents the basic and red for
acidic. The prolines and glycines are colored red to indicate potential break in α helical structure. The amino acid leucine is represented in yellow at d position and serine
is represented in blue color in the second position of the heptad which interacts with I, N, K and S at the e position. These data indicates that serine contributes less to
dimerization specificity than an aliphatic amino acid, polar asparagines or charged lysine residues. |
|
| |
| Future Perspectives |
| Experimental work should be done through in vivo and in vitro methods which show different binding activities of bHLH and bZIP
protein motifs. Yeast one Hybrid provides a satisfactory technique for
in vivo testing of Protein – DNA interactions like bHLHZ targets with
E-box. Through in vitro fluorescence anisotropy titrations protein
homodimer are to be measured: E-box dissociation constants and
circular dichorisim can be used to demonstrate the leucine zipper
significance. |
| |
| Conclusions |
| In this analysis dimerization partners of different plant BZIP
proteins were predicted and also observed for leucine zippers. The
result reveals that plants Phaseolus vulgaris, Capsicum annuum,
Lycopersicon esculentum and Hyacinthus orientalis, have three
repeats where as Spinacia oleracea has seven repeats of leucine.
BZIP proteins were identified based on the presence of α – helix
breakers, proline, pair of glycines, presence of leucines in the d
position, presence of charged amino acids in the g and e. Very few
histidine residues are distributed in the plant source and suggest that
such signaling system is absent. Phylogenetic analysis reveals that
all BZIP proteins use the same amino acids to regulate dimerization
specificity. Further experimental studies can be done to prove the
dimerization property. |
| |
| References |
- Christopher DD, Asha A, Vikas R, Barry W, Sjef S, et al. (2004) Dimerization
specificity of all 67 B-ZIP motifs in Arabidopsis thaliana: a comparison to Homo
sapiens BZIP motifs. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 3435-3445.
- Geourjon C, Deleage G (1995) SOPMA: Significant improvements in protein
secondary structure prediction by consensus prediction from multiple
alignments. Comput Appl Biosci 11: 681-684.
- Guiltinan MJ, Marcotte WR, Quatrano RS (1990) A plant leucine zipper protein
that recognizes an abscisic acid response element. Science 250: 267-271.
- Lu G, Gao C, Zheng X, Han B(2009) Identification of OsbZIP72 as a positive
regulatorof ABA response and drought tolerance in rice. Planta 229: 605-615.
- Luiz GC, Diego Mauricio RP, Carlos GS, Renato VS, Bernd MR, et al. (2008)
The Role of bZIP transcription factors in green plant evolution: adaptive
features emerging from four founder genes. PLoS One 3: e2944
- Maria M, Shuman JD, Subastian T, Dauter Z, Johnson PF (2003) Structural
basis for DNA recognition by the basic region leucine zipper transcription factor
CCAAT/enhancer – binding protein alpha. J Biol Chem 278: 15178-15184.
- Michel V, Paulo S, Luis G, Correa G, Fabiana K, Adilson L (2001). Phylogenetic
relationships between Arabidopsis and sugarcane bZIP transcriptional
regulatory factors. Genet Mol Biol 24: 55-60.
- O’Shea EK, Rutkowski R, Kim PS (1992) Mechanism of specificity in the Fos-
Jun oncoprotein heterodimer. Cell 68: 699-708.
- Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for
reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4: 406-425
- Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higguns DG (1997)
The CLUSTAL_X Windows Interface: Flexible stratgies for Multiple Sequene
Alignment Aided by Quality Analysis Tools. Nucleic Acids Res 24: 4876-4882.
|
|
This Article |
DOWNLOAD |
|
CONTRIBUTE |
|
SHARE |
|
|
EXPLORE |
|
| |
|
|
|
|