<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD 2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Proteomics Bioinform</journal-id>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">opg</journal-id>						
			<journal-title>Journal of Proteomics &amp; Bioinformatics</journal-title>			 
			<issn pub-type="epub">0974-276X</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>OMICS Publishing Group</publisher-name>
				<publisher-loc>India, USA</publisher-loc>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>			
			<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">000063</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Research Article</subject>
				</subj-group>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline">
					<subject>Biochemistry</subject>
				</subj-group>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="System Taxonomy">
					<subject>Proteomics</subject>
					<subject>Bioinformatics</subject>
					<subject>Genomics</subject>
					<subject>Transcriptomics</subject>
					<subject>Biomarkers</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Analysis of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in <italic>Pseudomonas Syringae</italic> Phages: Implication in Phage Therapy for Halo Blight Disease</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Sharma</surname>
						<given-names>Shashank</given-names>
					</name>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Sharan Vidyarthi</surname>
						<given-names>Ambrish</given-names>
					</name>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Poddar</surname>
						<given-names>Raju</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">&ast;</xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="af1">Department of Biotechnology Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi-835 215, India.</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="cor1">&ast; To whom correspondence should be addressed: Raju Poddar, Tel: +91-651-2276223; Fax: +91-651-2275401; E-mail: <email>rpoddar@bitmesra.ac.in</email></corresp>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date pub-type="collection">
			     <month>07</month>
				 <year>2008</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date pub-type="epub">
				<day>17</day>
				<month>07</month>
				<year>2008</year>
			</pub-date>			
			<volume>1</volume>
			<issue>4</issue>
			<fpage>206</fpage>
			<lpage>218</lpage>
			<history>
			<date date-type="received">
			     <day>22</day>
				 <month>04</month>
				 <year>2008</year>
			</date>
			<date date-type="accepted">
			      <day>16</day>
				  <month>07</month>
				  <year>2008</year>
			</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>				 
			<copyright-statement><bold>Copyright:</bold> &copy; 2008 Shashank S, etal.</copyright-statement>
			<copyright-year>2008</copyright-year>
			<license license-type="open access">
			<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</p>
			</license>
			</permissions>			
			<abstract>
				<p>Halo blight disease caused due <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> results extensive losses in dry Beans. Phage therapy can be tried as an alternative treatment. For evaluation of synonymous codon usage and codon variation, 20 phages of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> has been taken for testing. The effect of GC concentration in the phages can be considered for analyzing virulence in these phages. Mutational biasing and translational selection are also the important factors for predicting the appropriate biasing, which can be analyzed through Nc plot and correspondence analysis. Our analysis indicating that out of 20 phages 3 phages namely phage D3, D3112 and 119X are extremely virulent as they have high translational efficiency. Based on our data, we conclude that the phage D3 will be best suited as a phage therapy for treatment against halo blight disease.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group>
				<kwd>Halo blight</kwd>
				<kwd>relative synonymous codon usage</kwd>
				<kwd>correspondence analysis</kwd>
				<kwd>translational selection</kwd>
				<kwd>multivariate statistical analysis</kwd>
				<kwd><italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic></kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<custom-meta-wrap>
				<custom-meta>
					<meta-name>citation</meta-name>
					<meta-value>Sharma S, Vidyarthi AS, Poddar R (2008)Analysis of Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in Pseudomonas Syringae Phages: Implication in Phage Therapy for Halo Blight Disease.</meta-value>
				</custom-meta>
			</custom-meta-wrap>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec>
			<title>Introduction</title>
				<p>Halo blight disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r29">Saettler et. al., 1991</xref>) observed through world wide and it can cause extensive losses in dry beans. <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> is a legume pathogen of worldwide importance and is mainly responsible for Halo blight in Beans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6">Burkholder 1926</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r7">Burkholder, 1930</xref>). Phage therapy of this bacterial pathogen can be tried as an alternative treatment for protecting these legumes against such losses.</p>
				<p>Many amino acids are coded by more than one codon and therefore the multiple codons for a given amino acid are synonymous (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r17">Ikemura, 1985</xref>). However many genes displays a non random usage of specific amino acid and the measure of the extent to this non randomness is given by Relative Synonymous Codon Usage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r32">Sharp et. al., 1987</xref>). Some genes have extremely biased codon usage: these genes appear to be expressed at higher levels, and other genes (apparently those expressed at low levels) have relatively unbiased codon usage. The other factors which are responsible for variation in codon usage are mutational biasing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r23">Levin et. al., 2000</xref>) and translational selection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r12">Grantham et. al., 1981</xref>).</p>
				<p>The total of 1214 genes of twenty phages of Pseudomonas are considered which are classified in six families viz. podoviridae, myoviridae, siphoviridae, inoviridae, cystoviridae and leviviridae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r22">Krieg et. al.,1984</xref>). The genome of Pseudomonas phages shows a considerable variation in their genome size ranging from 2300 – 280000 bps. The Genome of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> phage is rich in G-C content which an average accounts for nearly 55% of the total genome content. We found that the optimal codons exhibited variation (AT- or GC-ending codons) in different phages. We also found that genes that were specifically expressed had different patterns of codon usage and local genomic GC (GCg) content. Our efforts to work on this project will provide a path for treatment of halo blight using phage therapy of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>. In this paper, we studied the synonymous codon usage bias in all the phages of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> whose genomic sequences are known.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="methods">
			<title>Materials and Methods</title>
				<p>The gene sequences of twenty different phages of Pseudomonas were retrieved from NCBI (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/</ext-link>). The gene sequences are retrieved in the FASTA format. The total of 1214 genes is considered for analysis. These genes are of twenty different phages of six families namely podoviridae, myoviridae, siphoviridae, inoviridae, cystoviridae and leviviridae, and were used to study codon bias in these phages. The basic nature and status of the above twenty phages are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1.</xref></p>
				<p>The gene number for these phages varies from 4 to 301. All the above phage genomes were extracted from featurable table of genome according to gene bank records and all this gene sequences were used for the comparative analysis of the codon usage studies.</p>				
				<p>The gene number for these phages varies from 4 to 301. All the above phage genomes were extracted from featurable table of genome according to gene bank records and all this gene sequences were used for the comparative analysis of the codon usage studies.</p>
				<p>For multivariate analysis we performed Correspondence Analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r13">Greenacre, 1984</xref>) which is available on CodonW 1.3 accessible at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="www.molbiol.ox.ac.uk/cu">http://www.molbiol.ox.ac.uk/cu</ext-link>. The Relative Synonymous Codon Usage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r32">Sharp et. al., 1987</xref>) identifies when a codon is being used more frequently than expected and when it is being used less frequently than expected RSCU values are the number of times a particular codon is observed, relative to the number of times that the codon would be observed in the absence of any codon usage bias. Sometimes the observed frequency will be greater than the expected frequency if RSCU value is greater than 1.00, and sometimes it will be less when RSCU value is less than 1.00. RSCU values of each codon for the two groups of genes located at the extreme ends of the first major axis are determined by Correspondence analysis. Each group contains 10% of sequences located on the two extremes of the first major axis.</p>
				<p>A<sub>3s</sub>, T<sub>3s</sub>, G<sub>3s</sub>, C<sub>3s</sub>, are the frequencies of the bases A (adenine), C (cytosine), G (guanine), and T (thiamine) occurring in codon position in the genome and GC<sub>3s</sub> is the G+C distribution at the synonymous third positions of codons. This G+C content is considered to be the most effective cause of mutational pressure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r40">Sueoka et.al. 2000</xref>). N<sub>c</sub> value is an effective number of codons measure that quantifies how far the codon usage of a gene deposits from equal usage of synonymous codons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r42">Wright, 1990</xref>). N<sub>c</sub> values range from 61 for a gene that tends to use all codons with equal frequency to 20 for a gene that is effectively using only a single codon for each amino acid.</p>
				<p>There is a relationship between N<sub>c</sub> and the base composition of a gene with genes that have more biased base compositions being expected to have lower N<sub>c</sub> values. Usually, lower N<sub>c</sub> values might be dictated by the base composition of the gene. This might be taken as evidence that there is some kind of selective pressure on the gene to use a smaller subset of codons. This selective pressure could be translational selection for ‘optimal’ codons. Optimal codons are those that correspond to the major abundance tRNA for that amino acid. In such circumstances, there could be a selective pressure to use a particular codon that corresponds to this tRNA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r10">Dong et.Al., 1996</xref>).</p>
				<p>The copy number of tRNA species in <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> phage D3 strain and corresponding anticodon sequences were determined by the program tRNA scan-SE  available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="www.selab.janelina.org/tRNA scan-SE">http://selab.janelina.org/tRNA scan-SE/</ext-link>. It has been shown that the pattern of codon usage in the highly expressed genes of <italic>Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic> correlates very strongly with the known abundances of the iso-accepting transfer-RNAs (tRNAs) ) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r15">Ikemura,1981</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r3">Bennetzen et.al.,1982</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r16">Ikemura,1982</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r30">Sharp et.al.,1991</xref>). The advantage of this system (translational selection) is self-evident- using a codon for which there is an abundant cognate tRNA can speed up the process of mRNA translation.</p>
				<p>The graph was plotted between various attributes of codon usage like graph of N<sub>c</sub>-GC<sub>3s</sub>, Axis 1 - Axis 2, AXIS 2 - N<sub>c</sub> were plotted by the SIGMA PLOT 9.0 . The Correlations coefficient between the positions of genes along the first two major axis with different parameters for codon usage was calculated through SYSTAT 11.0. The alignment among the 20 phages for generating an aligned sequence for dendogram is produced by Clustalw 1.83. A dendrogram representing the extent of divergence in synonymous codon usage among the total phages of pseudomonas was constructed by the DS GENE-SCAN. The tRNA counts present in the genome of phage are calculated by tRNA SCAN SE Server.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<title>Results and Discussion</title>
				<sec>
					<title>Variations in Synonymous Codon Usage</title>
						<p>The values of RSCU had been determined in 1214 genes of all the 20 phages of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>. It has been observed that all the phages carry GC rich genome. G and C ending codon are predominant in all phages. The concentration of GC present in overall genome of the phage ranges from 36% (phage phiKZ) to 64% (phage DMS3 and phage D3112). To detect codon usage variation if present in any gene of the above-mentioned phages, effective number of codons used by a gene (N<sub>c</sub>) and the (G + C) percentage of the synonymous third positions of the codons (GC<sub>3s</sub>) were determined.</p>
						<p>The value of GC3s ranges from 0.144 to 0.912 with an average of 0.549 whereas the value of Nc ranges from 22.74 to 61 with an average of 48.16. The marked intragenomic variation in GC3s (standard variation &gt; 7%) and in Nc values (standard deviation &gt; 4.4% except for phage PP7). These observations indicate that there is a significant heterogeneity in composition within the phage genome of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>. The average codon usage bias and the base composition of 20 <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> phage are mentioned in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2:</xref></p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>The Effect of Mutational Bias on Codon Usage Variation</title>
						<p>A study of correlations between introns and coding region base composition shows that variation in mutation pattern also contributes to codon bias variation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r21">Kliman, et. al., 2003</xref>). The strength of base composition correlations between introns and codon third positions is greater for genes with low codon bias than for genes with high codon bias. One direct effect of mutation bias on genome evolution is to influence genome composition, which can be measured by G+C content. For analyzing the determinants of codon usage bias in the phages of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, N<sub>c</sub> plots (a plot of N<sub>c</sub> versus GC<sub>3s</sub>) and the correspondence analysis (CA) are used widely.</p>
						<p>The N<sub>c</sub> plot drawn for the genes of 20 Pseudomonas phages are displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="g1">Figure 1</xref>. Some of the points especially of phage phiKZ, phage119X and phage B3 lie on the expected curve towards GC-poor regions (GC value 0.144 to 0.2) which certainly originates from extremely mutational bias. It is evident from the figure that a considerable number of genes lie well below the expected curve, indicating that codon usage bias of these genes are influenced by the forces other than genomic GC composition. Points demonstrated by phage D3 and phage D3112 lie away from the expected curve in comparison with the rest of the phage genes which indicate that the effect of mutational bias on codon usage variation in the former three phage genes is very weak. This phenomenon was further verified with other statistical analysis like correspondence analysis.</p>						
				<p>The correspondence analysis of RSCU values of 1214 genes of the 20 <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> phages confirms that mutational bias and other factors are also responsible for codon usage variation. The main objective to plot genes in axis 1 and axis 2 space is finding of optimal codons. Optimal codons are defined as those codons that occur significantly more often in highly expressed genes relative to their frequency in lowly expressed genes. Significance is assessed by a twoway chi square contingency test with the criterion of p &lt; 0.01. The advantage of using a test of significance to identify optimal codons is that variation in codon usage between highly and lowly expressed genes, that is due to random noise is suppressed. Correspondence analysis is a multivariate statistical analysis technique to study codon usage variation among genes (Wright, 1981). In this analysis, the data are plotted in a multidimensional space of 59 axes (excluding Met, Trp and stop codons), then the most prominent axes are determined that contribute to the codon usage variation among the genes.</p>
				<p>The positions of genes along the first as well as the second major axis (generated by CA) are analyzed with the nucleotide composition at the third codon shows that the first major axis is positively correlated with G3 (r, correlation coefficient = 0.067), C3 (r = 0.261 with P &lt; 0.05) and negatively correlated with A3 (r, correlation coefficient = - 0.043) and T3 (r correlation coefficient = -0.104). In contrast the reverse is true for the second major axis.</p>
				<fig id="g1">
					<label>Figure 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Nc plot of genes from 20 <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> phages.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="JPB-01-206-g001.tif"/>
				</fig>				
				<p>The correlation coefficient between the second axis and GC<sub>3S</sub> is relatively small as compared to that between the axis1 and GC<sub>3s</sub> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). But it is worth mentioning that the axis2 exhibits strong negative correlation with G<sub>3s</sub> and positive correlation with C<sub>3s</sub> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). These observations indicate that G<sub>3s</sub> and C<sub>3s</sub> interact synergistically in the first principal axis resulting in the increase of GC3S content, but antagonistically in the second principal axis so that increase in the frequency of C<sub>3S</sub> is accompanied by a decrease in G3S and vice-versa.</p>
				<p>The position of genes of the first two major axes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="g2">Figure 2</xref>) clearly shows that the majority of genes of phage D3, phage D3112 and phage 119X are not clustered with genes of the other phages. To investigate the difference between these two clusters of genes, the codon usage of 10% of the genes located at extreme right side of axis 1 was compared with 10% of the genes located at the extreme left side of axis 1. To access the variation in codon usage between these two genes, chi-square tests were performed taking P &lt; 0.01 as the significant criterion. The number and occurrence of each codon and its RSCU values for the two groups of genes are displayed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3.</xref></p>
				<p>Out of 21 predominant codons there are 11 C ending codons and 8 G ending codons which actually represent 90.47% of total G and C ending codons. This result suggests that genomic GC composition has a profound effect on in separating the genes along the first major axis according to their RSCU values. It has been reported that RNY codons are more advantageous for translation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r35">Shepherd, 1981</xref>). It was also demonstrated that in highly expressed genes of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>, C is the prominent base at the third codon position (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r14">Gutiérrez et.al., 1996</xref>).The high occurrence of C ending codons in highly expressed genes demonstrates that compositional constraints are not the only factor in determining the codon usage variation in this organism. If compositional constraints are the only dictator in codon usage variation in this organism, the base composition in the third codon position among these optimal codons should have also A or T ending codons as observed in the overall RSCU values of this organism. A similar type of observation was also reported for <italic>Plasmodium falciparum</italic>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r27">Musto et.al., 1999</xref>).</p>
				<fig id="g2">				
					<label>Figure 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Position of genes from 20 <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> phages along the two major axes of variation in the correspondence analysis on RSCU values.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="JPB-01-206-g002.tif"/>
				</fig>
				<fig id="g3">
					<label>Figure 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Plot between the average value of Axis 1 and Axis 2 of 20 phages of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic>.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="JPB-01-206-g003.tif"/>
				</fig>
				<p>Cluster analysis has been successfully used to study the frequency of codon usage divergence among the genes of an organism and also among the organisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r31">Sharp et.al., 1986</xref>). The codon frequency of 64 codons for each organism was compared with the codon frequency with all other organisms. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="g4">Figure 4</xref> shows the clustering produced by UPGMA (unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages) method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r37">Sneath et.al., 1973</xref>). From the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="g4">figure 4</xref> it is evident that there are two distinct branches for the twenty <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> phages.Second branch out of the two branches comprises of PP7, PaP3, phiKMV, gh-1, phi-12L, phi-6l and phiEL and the rest are in first branch. Phage D3, D3112 and 119X are of same branch and it suggest that they have nearly similar synonymous codon usage pattern, provided 119x is of family podoviradae, while the other two phage D3 and D3112 are from Siphoviridae.</p>							
				<p>The above cluster analysis has not only supported our correspondence as well as variance analyses (mentioned above) but also assisted in understanding the intra- and inter- genomic diversities of the <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> bacteriophages in a much better way.</p>				
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>The Influence of Translational Selection Over Codon Usage Variation in Pseudomonas Syringae</title>
						<p>In <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster</italic>, which are characterized by extensive variation in codon usage, the factors governing the choices have been attributed to equilibrium between mutational biases and translational selction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r36">Shieldset.al.,1988</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r33">Sharpet.al., 1989</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r25">Moriyamaet.al.,1992</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r8">Carulli et.al.,1993</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r1">Akashi; 1994</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2">Akashi;1997</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r38">Stenico et.al.,1994</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r26">Moriyama et. al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r28">Powell et.al. 1997</xref>). In many organisms, selection acts on synonymous codons to improve translation. The selection on synonymous codon use in E. coli is largely due to selection for translation accuracy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r11">Gouy, 1982</xref>).The plot between second major Axis and N<sub>c</sub> values suggest that a substantial number of phage genes, particularly to the phages of D3, D3112 and 119X have lower N<sub>c</sub> values as compare to other phage genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="g5">figure 5</xref>).</p>
						<p>The first major axis is negatively correlated with N<sub>c</sub>, whereas the second major axis is positively correlated with N<sub>c</sub> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). This suggests that considerable number of phage genes carrying GC-rich codons have low Nc values. On the basis of these results, we urge that a balance between mutation and selection due to translational efficiency is strongly operating in selecting the codon usage variation among the genes of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> phages. Besides phages D3, D3112, 119X mostly carry highly expressed genes.</p>
						<p>Various reports suggests that the synonymous codon choices appear to be positively correlated with the relative abundance of tRNAs, with the correlation being very strong for highly expressed genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r15">Ikemura,1981</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r3">Bennetzen et.al.,1982</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r16">Ikemura,1982</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r15">Ikemura,1981</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r3">Bennetzen et.al. 1982</xref>, Gouy et.al.,1982 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r31">Sharp et.al.,1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r4">Bulmer,1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r5">Bulmer,1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r20">Kanaya et.al.,1999</xref>)In several organisms, cellular tRNA abundance was shown to be directly proportional to their tRNA copy number (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r20">Kanaya et.al.,1999</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r19">Kanaya et.al.,2001</xref>)<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table4</xref>.</p>
				<p>To point any positive correlation between host tRNA abundance and synonymous codon usage of phage D3 and phage D3112 a comparative analysis was made between the copy numbers of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> specific tRNA and over represented synonymous codons of phage D3 and phage D3112 separately (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
				<p>It was found that out of total 23 over-represented codons of D3, 20 are recognized by those <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> specific tRNAs that have at least one copy in the cell. In contrast, 2 less over-represented codons of D3112 are recognized by abundant tRNAs <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> specific tRNAs. The data indicates that most of the genes of D3 and D3112 have high translation efficiency.</p>
				<fig id="g4">
					<label>Figure 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>A phylogram representing the extent of divergence in synonymous codon usage of 20 phages of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic>.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="JPB-01-206-g004.tif"/>
				</fig>												
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<title>Conclusion</title>
				<p>The study of Synonymous codon usage of 20 phages of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> has been done in our work. Out of these 20 phages, phage D3, D3112 and 119X codon usage, their correlation with expression levels and their translational selection clearly suggest that these may be useful for curing <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> infections.</p>
				<p>Further, a comparative analysis of codon usage and RSCU value of the protein coding genes of these 20 phages was done. The cluster analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="g2">figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">table 3</xref>) also indicates the similarity in the synonymous codon usage and the divergence among the phages D3, D3112 and 119X. The RSCU value suggest that D3 and D3112 have high GC content and the phage 119X though have high AT rich regions, but the codon variation is uniform in phage 119X (shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="g1">figure 1</xref>). It is observed that D3 carries most highly expressed genes compared with the other phages. Also the over-represented codons of D3 are preferentially reorganized compared with other phages. Based on this data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="g5">figure 5</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">table 5</xref>), we suggest that the genes of D3 are expressed rapidly by host’s translation machinery. Several lytic phages had been used successfully to cure infected patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r41">Sulakvelidze, et.al.,2001</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r24">Markoishvili, et.al.,2002</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r18">Jikia, et.al.,2005</xref>). It is speculated whether to use phages as a mixture of relatively weak and virulent phages or as one of a kind. A comparative analysis on codon usage of <italic>E. coli</italic> phages T1, T3, T4, T5 and T7 indicates that T4 carries the highest percentage of highly expressed genes among 5 phages and T4-like phages showed immense potential in therapy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r9">Chibani-Chennoufi et.al. 2004</xref>).</p>
				<fig id="g5">
					<label>Figure 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Plot between the genes of 20 <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> phages and N<sub>c</sub> values.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="JPB-01-206-g005.tif"/>
				</fig>
				<p>Our results interprets that the codon usage of different phages of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> vary significantly which can be suggested due to the occurrence of several factors such as mutational biasing, translational selection etc.</p>
				<p>On the basis of our data we suggest that out of twenty phages of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> phage D3 will be best suited for the treatment of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> infections. Thus the phage D3 may be recommended to the phage therapy for the treatment of halo blight disease of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic>.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<p>The authors are thankful to the Sub-Distributed Information Center (BTISnet SubDIC), Department of Biotechnology (No. BT/BI/04/065/04), New Delhi, India for financial support.</p>
		</ack>
		  <ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="r1">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Akashi</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</name>											
					</person-group>
					<year>1994</year>
					<article-title>Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy</article-title>
					<source>Genetics</source>
					<volume>136</volume>
					<fpage>927</fpage>
					<lpage>935</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r2">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Akashi</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</name>											
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<article-title>Codon bias evolution in Drosophila Population genetics of mutation-selection drift</article-title>
					<source>Genetics</source>
					<volume>205</volume>
					<fpage>269</fpage>
					<lpage>278</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r3">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Bennetzen</surname>
							<given-names>JL</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Hall</surname>
							<given-names>BD</given-names>
						</name>												
					</person-group>
					<year>1982</year>
					<article-title>Codon selection in yeast</article-title>
					<source>J Biol Chem</source>
					<volume>257</volume>
					<fpage>3026</fpage>
					<lpage>3031</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r4">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Bulmer</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>																
					</person-group>
					<year>1988</year>
					<article-title>Codon usage and intragenic position</article-title>
					<source>J Theor Biol</source>
					<volume>133</volume>
					<fpage>67</fpage>
					<lpage>71</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r5">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Bulmer</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>																
					</person-group>
					<year>1991</year>
					<article-title>The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage Genetics</article-title>					
					<volume>129</volume>
					<fpage>897</fpage>
					<lpage>907</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r6">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Burkholder</surname>
							<given-names>WH</given-names>
						</name>																
					</person-group>
					<year>1926</year>
					<article-title>A new bacterial disease of the bean</article-title>	
					<source>Phytopathology</source>				
					<volume>16</volume>
					<fpage>915</fpage>
					<lpage>928</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r7">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Burkholder</surname>
							<given-names>WH</given-names>
						</name>																
					</person-group>
					<year>1930</year>
					<article-title>The bacterial diseases of the bean: a comparative study</article-title>	
					<source>Memoirs, Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station</source>
					<volume>127</volume>				
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>88</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r8">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Carulli</surname>
							<given-names>JP</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Krane</surname>
							<given-names>DE</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hartl</surname>
							<given-names>DL</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ochman</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</name>															
					</person-group>
					<year>1993</year>
					<article-title>Compositional heterogeneity and patterns of molecular evolution in the Drosophila genome</article-title>	
					<source>Genetics</source>
					<volume>134</volume>				
					<fpage>837</fpage>
					<lpage>845</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r9">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Chibani</surname>
							<given-names>CS</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Sidoti</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bruttin</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kutter</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Sarker</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name><etal/>															
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>In vitro and in vivo bacteriolytic activities of <italic>E. coli</italic> phages: implications for phage therapy</article-title>	
					<source>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</source>
					<volume>48</volume>				
					<fpage>2558</fpage>
					<lpage>2569</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r10">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Dong</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Nilsson</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kurland</surname>
							<given-names>CG</given-names>
						</name>																				
					</person-group>
					<year>1996</year>
					<article-title>Co-variation of tRNA abundance and codon usage in <italic>Escherichia coli </italic>at different growth rates</article-title>	
					<source>J Mol Biol</source>
					<volume>260</volume>				
					<fpage>649</fpage>
					<lpage>663</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r11">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Gouy</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Gautier</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</name>																							
					</person-group>
					<year>1982</year>
					<article-title>Codon usage in bacteria:correlation with gene expressivity</article-title>	
					<source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
					<volume>10</volume>				
					<fpage>7055</fpage>
					<lpage>7074</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r12">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Grantham</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Gautier</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gouy</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jacobzone</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mercier</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>																								
					</person-group>
					<year>1981</year>
					<article-title>Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity</article-title>	
					<source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
					<volume>9</volume>				
					<fpage>43</fpage>
					<lpage>74</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r13">
					<citation citation-type="book">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Greenacre</surname>
							<given-names>MJ</given-names>
						</name>																									
					</person-group>
					<year>1984</year>
					<article-title>Theory and applications of correspondence analysis</article-title>					  
					<publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>					
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r14">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Gutiérrez</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Márquez</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Marín</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>																												
					</person-group>
					<year>1996</year>
					<article-title>Preference for guanosine at first codon position in highly expressed <italic>Escherichia coli </italic> genes: A relationship with translational efficiency</article-title>	
					<source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
					<volume>24</volume>				
					<fpage>2525</fpage>
					<lpage>2527</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r15">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Ikemura</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>																															
					</person-group>
					<year>1981</year>
					<article-title>Correlation between the abundance of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the<italic>E. coli</italic>translational system</article-title>	
					<source>J Mol Biol</source>
					<volume>151</volume>				
					<fpage>389</fpage>
					<lpage>409</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r16">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Ikemura</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>																															
					</person-group>
					<year>1982</year>
					<article-title>Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective
codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs</article-title>	
					<source>J Mol Biol</source>
					<volume>158</volume>				
					<fpage>573</fpage>
					<lpage>579</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r17">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Ikemura</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>																															
					</person-group>
					<year>1985</year>
					<article-title>Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms</article-title>	
					<source>Mol Biol Evol</source>
					<volume>2</volume>				
					<fpage>13</fpage>
					<lpage>34</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r18">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Jikia</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Chkhaidze</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Imedashvili</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Mgaloblishvili</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Tsitlandze</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</name><etal/>																															
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>The use of novel biodegradable preparation capable of the sustained release of bacteriophages and ciprofloxacin,in the complex treatment of multidrug-resistant <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>-infected local radiation injuries caused by exposure to Sr90</article-title>	
					<source>Clin Exp Dermatol.</source>
					<volume>30</volume>				
					<fpage>23</fpage>
					<lpage>26</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r19">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Kanaya</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Yamada</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Kinouchi</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Kudo</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Ikemura</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>																														
					</person-group>
					<year>2001</year>
					<article-title>Codon usage and tRNA genes in eukaryotes: correlation of codon usage diversity with translation efficiency and with CG dinucleotide usages assessed by multivariate analysis</article-title>	
					<source>J Mol Evol</source>
					<volume>53</volume>				
					<fpage>290</fpage>
					<lpage>298</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r20">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Kanaya</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Yamada</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Kudo</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>						
						<name>
							<surname>Ikemura</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>																														
					</person-group>
					<year>1999</year>
					<article-title>Studies of codon usage and tRNA genes of 18 unicellular organisms and quantification of Bacillus subtilis tRNAs: gene expression level and species-specific diversity of codon usage based on multivariate analysis</article-title>	
					<source>Genetics</source>
					<volume>238</volume>				
					<fpage>143</fpage>
					<lpage>155</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r21">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Kliman</surname>
							<given-names>RM</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Hey</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>																																				
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<article-title>Hill-Robertson interference in Drosophila melanogaster</article-title>	
					<source>Genet Res</source>
					<volume>81</volume>				
					<fpage>89</fpage>
					<lpage>90</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r22">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Krieg</surname>							
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Noel</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
						    <surname>Bergey’s</surname>
						</name>																																									
					</person-group>
					<year>1984</year> 
					<source>Manual of Systematic Bacteriology</source>					 
					<volume>Vol 1</volume>  
					<publisher-loc>Baltimore</publisher-loc>
					  <publisher-name>Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher-name>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r23">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Levin</surname>
							<given-names>DB</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Whittome</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</name>																																				
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>Codon usage in nucleopolyhedroviruses</article-title>	
					<source>J Gen Virol</source>
					<volume>81</volume>				
					<fpage>2313</fpage>
					<lpage>2325</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r24">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Markoishvili</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Tsitlanadze</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Katsarava</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Morris</surname>
							<given-names>JG</given-names>
							 <suffix>Jr</suffix>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Sulakvelidze</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>																																				
					</person-group>
					<year>2002</year>
					<article-title>A novel sustained-released matrix based on biodegradable polyester amides and impregnated
with bacteriophages and an antibiotic shows promise in management of infected venous stasis ulcers and other poorly healing wounds</article-title>	
					<source>Int J Dermatol</source>
					<volume>41</volume>				
					<fpage>453</fpage>
					<lpage>458</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r25">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Moriyama</surname>
							<given-names>EN</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Gojobori</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>																																								
					</person-group>
					<year>1992</year>
					<article-title>Rates of synonymous substitution and base composition of nuclear genes in Drosophila</article-title>	
					<source>Genetics</source>
					<volume>130</volume>				
					<fpage>855</fpage>
					<lpage>864</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r26">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Moriyama</surname>
							<given-names>EN</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Powell</surname>
							<given-names>JR</given-names>
						</name>																																								
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<article-title>Synonymous substitution rates in Drosophila: mitochondrial versus nuclear genes</article-title>	
					<source>J Mol Evol</source>
					<volume>45</volume>				
					<fpage>378</fpage>
					<lpage>391</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r27">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Musto</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Romero</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zavala</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Jabbari</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Bernardi</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</name>																																									
					</person-group>
					<year>1999</year>
					<article-title>Synonymous codon choices in the extremely GCpoor genome of <italic>Plasmodium falciparum </italic>: compositional constraints and translational selection</article-title>	
					<source>J Mol Evol</source>
					<volume>49</volume>				
					<fpage>27</fpage>
					<lpage>35</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r28">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Powell</surname>
							<given-names>JR</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Moriyama</surname>
							<given-names>EN</given-names>
						</name>																																													
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<article-title>Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila Proc</article-title>	
					<source>Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
					<volume>94</volume>				
					<fpage>7784</fpage>
					<lpage>7790</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r29">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
				   <person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Saettler</surname>
							<given-names>AW</given-names>
						</name>								 
					      </person-group>   
						  <source>Halo Blight P30 in Compendium of Bean Diseases</source>
					    <year>1991</year>
						<edition>R Hall</edition> 						
						<publisher-name>APS Press</publisher-name>
						<publisher-loc>St Paul</publisher-loc>
				</citation>								
			</ref>
			<ref id="r30">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Sharp</surname>
							<given-names>PM</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Cowe</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</name>																																													
					</person-group>
					<year>1991</year>
					<article-title>Synonymous codon usage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae</article-title>	
					<source>Yeast</source>
					<volume>7</volume>				
					<fpage>657</fpage>
					<lpage>678</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r31">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Sharp</surname>
							<given-names>PM</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>WH</given-names>
						</name>																																													
					</person-group>
					<year>1986</year>
					<article-title>An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms</article-title>	
					<source>J Mol Evol</source>
					<volume>24</volume>				
					<fpage>28</fpage>
					<lpage>38</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r32">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Sharp</surname>
							<given-names>PM</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>WH</given-names>
						</name>																																													
					</person-group>
					<year>1987</year>
					<article-title>The codon adaptation index a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications</article-title>	
					<source>Nucleic Acids Research</source>
					<volume>15</volume>				
					<fpage>1281</fpage>
					<lpage>1295</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r33">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Sharp</surname>
							<given-names>PM</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>WH</given-names>
						</name>																																													
					</person-group>
					<year>1989</year>
					<article-title>On the rate of DNA sequence evolution in Drosophila</article-title>	
					<source>J Mol Evol</source>
					<volume>28</volume>				
					<fpage>398</fpage>
					<lpage>402</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r34">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Sharp</surname>
							<given-names>PM</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Tuohy</surname>
							<given-names>TMF</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mosurski</surname>
							<given-names>KR</given-names>
						</name>																																														
					</person-group>
					<year>1986</year>
					<article-title>Codon usage in yeast: Cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes</article-title>	
					<source>Nucleic Acids Research</source>
					<volume>14</volume>				
					<fpage>5125</fpage>
					<lpage>5143</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r35">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Shepherd</surname>
							<given-names>JCW</given-names>
						</name>																																																	
					</person-group>
					<year>1981</year>
					<article-title>Method to determine the reading frame of a protein from the purine/pyrimidine genome sequence and its possible evolutionary justification</article-title>	
					<source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
					<volume>78</volume>				
					<fpage>1596</fpage>
					<lpage>1600</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r36">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Shields</surname>
							<given-names>DC</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Sharp</surname>
							<given-names>PM</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Higgins</surname>
							<given-names>DG</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Wright</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</name>																																																	
					</person-group>
					<year>1988</year>
					<article-title>‘Silent’ sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons</article-title>	
					<source>Mol Biol Evol</source>
					<volume>5</volume>				
					<fpage>704</fpage>
					<lpage>716</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r37">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">    
				<name>      
					 <surname>Sneath</surname>					 
				 </name> 
				 <name> 
					 <surname>Sokal</surname>					 
				 </name> 
					</person-group>
					<source>Numerical Taxonomy</source>
					<year>1973</year>					
					<publisher-name>WH Freeman &amp; Company</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>San Francisco</publisher-loc>  
					<fpage>230</fpage>
					<lpage>234</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r38">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Stenico</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Lloyd</surname>
							<given-names>AT</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Sharp</surname>
							<given-names>PM</given-names>
						</name>																																																				
					</person-group>
					<year>1994</year>
					<article-title>Codon usage in Caenorhabditis elegans: delineation of translational selection and mutational biases</article-title>	
					<source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
					<volume>22</volume>				
					<fpage>2437</fpage>
					<lpage>2446</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r39">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Stoletzki</surname>							
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Nina</surname>							
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Eyre</surname>
							<given-names>W</given-names>							
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Adam</surname>							
						</name>																																																				
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Synonymous Codon Usage in Escherichia coli: Selection for Translational Accuracy</article-title>	
					<source>Molecular Biology and Evolution</source>
					<volume>24</volume>				
					<fpage>374</fpage>
					<lpage>381</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r40">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Sueoka</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Kawanishi</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>																																																								
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>DNA, G+C content of the third codon position and codon usage biases of human genes</article-title>	
					<source>Gene</source>
					<volume>261</volume>				
					<fpage>53</fpage>
					<lpage>62</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r41">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Sulakvelidze</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>	
						<name>
							<surname>Alavidze</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Morris</surname>
							<given-names>JG</given-names>
							<suffix>Jr</suffix>
						</name>																																																									
					</person-group>
					<year>2001</year>
					<article-title>Bacteriophage therapy</article-title>	
					<source>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</source>
					<volume>45</volume>				
					<fpage>649</fpage>
					<lpage>659</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="r42">
					<citation citation-type="journal">
					<person-group>
						<name>
							<surname>Wright</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</name>																																																											
					</person-group>
					<year>1990</year>
					<article-title>The effective number of codons used in a gene</article-title>	
					<source>Gene</source>
					<volume>87</volume>				
					<fpage>23</fpage>
					<lpage>29</lpage>
				</citation>
			</ref>
</ref-list>		
		<glossary>
			<def-list>
				<title>Abbreviations</title>
				<def-item>
					<term>RSCU</term>
					<def>
						<p>Relative Synonymous Codon Usage</p>
					</def>
				</def-item>
				<def-item>
					<term>CA</term>
					<def>
						<p>Correspondence Analysis</p>
					</def>
				</def-item>
				<def-item>
					<term>N<sub>c</sub></term>
					<def>
						<p>effective number of codons</p>
					</def>
				</def-item>
				<def-item>
					<term>GC<sub>3s</sub></term>
					<def>
						<p>the frequency of (G + C) at synonymous third codon positions</p>
					</def>
				</def-item>
			</def-list>
		</glossary>
	</back>
 <floats-wrap>
	<table-wrap position="float" id="t1">
	<label>Table 1.</label>
  			<caption>
  				<title>Tabulated classification of phages from NCBI.</title>
  			</caption>
   <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
      <thead>
         <tr>
            <th align="left">Family</th>
            <th align="left">Phage name</th>
            <th align="left">Accession No.<sup>a</sup></th>
			<th align="left">No. of genes per phage<sup>b</sup></th>					
         </tr>
      </thead>
      <tbody>
         <tr>
            <td rowspan="6">Podoviridae</td>
            <td>119X</td>
            <td>NC_007807</td>
			<td>53</td>            	
         </tr>
         <tr>
            <td>F116</td>
            <td>NC_006552</td>
            <td>70</td>					
         </tr>
         <tr>
            <td>gh1</td>
            <td>NC_004665</td>
            <td>42</td>					
         </tr>
         <tr>
            <td>PaP2</td>
            <td>NC_005884</td>
            <td>58</td>				
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>phiKMV</td>
            <td>NC_005045</td>
            <td>49</td>						
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>Pap3</td>
            <td>NC_004466</td>
            <td>75</td>						
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="3">Myoviridae</td>
			<td>phiCTX</td>
            <td>NC_003278</td>
            <td>47</td>						
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>phiKZ</td>
            <td>NC_004629</td>
            <td>306</td>						
         </tr>
		  <tr>
            <td>EL</td>
            <td>NC_007623</td>
            <td>201</td>						
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="4">Siphoviridae</td>
			<td>B3</td>
            <td>NC_006548</td>
            <td>59</td>						
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>D3112</td>
            <td>NC_005178</td>
            <td>55</td>						
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>DMS3</td>
            <td>NC_008717</td>
            <td>52</td>						
         </tr>
		  <tr>
            <td>D3</td>
            <td>NC_002484</td>
            <td>99</td>						
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Inoviridae</td>
            <td>Pf1</td>
            <td>NC_001331</td>	
			<td>14</td>					
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>Pf3</td>
            <td>NC_001418</td>	
			<td>9</td>					
         </tr>
		  <tr>
            <td rowspan="4">Cystoviridae</td>
            <td>Phi8L</td>
            <td>NC_003299</td>	
			<td>6</td>					
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>Phi12L</td>
            <td>NC_004173</td>	
			<td>6</td>					
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>Phi13M</td>
            <td>NC_004171</td>	
			<td>5</td>					
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>Phi6L</td>
            <td>NC_003715</td>	
			<td>4</td>					
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>Leviviridae</td>
            <td>PP7</td>	
			<td>NC_001628</td>
			<td>4</td>					
         </tr>
     </tbody>
 	  </table>
	  <table-wrap-foot>
  				<fn>
  					<p><sup>a</sup> Gene Bank Accession No. , The number assigned by database NCBI (USA).</p>
					<p><sup>b</sup> No. of genes per phage as downloaded from database.</p>
  				</fn>
  			</table-wrap-foot>
 	</table-wrap>
	<table-wrap position="float" id="t2">
	<label>Table 2.</label>
  			<caption>
  				<title>Various attributes of twenty phages of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>.</title>
  			</caption>
   <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
      <thead>
         <tr>
            <th align="left">Family</th>
            <th align="left">Phage name</th>
            <th align="left">Accession No.a</th>
			<th align="left">GC%</th>
			<th align="left">T3s</th>
			<th align="left">C3s</th>	
			<th align="left">A3s</th>
			<th align="left">G3s</th>
			<th align="left">Nc</th>	
			<th align="left">GC3s</th>
			<th align="left">Gravy</th>		
         </tr>
      </thead>
      <tbody>
         <tr>
            <td rowspan="6">Podoviridae</td>
            <td>119X</td>
            <td>NC_007807</td>
			<td>44</td>
            <td>0.37</td>
            <td>0.26</td>	
			<td>0.33</td>
			<td>0.29</td>
            <td>49</td>
            <td>0.43</td>			
			<td>-0.22</td>
         </tr>
         <tr>
            <td>F116</td>
            <td>NC_006552</td>
            <td>63</td>
			<td>0.22</td>
            <td>0.35</td>
            <td>0.27</td>	
			<td>0.32</td>
			<td>48</td>
            <td>0.58</td>
            <td>-0.85</td>			
         </tr>
         <tr>
            <td>gh1</td>
            <td>NC_004665</td>
            <td>57</td>
			<td>0.19</td>
            <td>0.33</td>
            <td>0.22</td>	
			<td>0.38</td>
			<td>46</td>
            <td>0.62</td>
            <td>-0.43</td>			
         </tr>
         <tr>
            <td>PaP2</td>
            <td>NC_005884</td>
            <td>45</td>
			<td>0.27</td>
            <td>0.28</td>
            <td>0.34</td>	
			<td>0.32</td>
			<td>48</td>
            <td>0.49</td>
            <td>-0.15</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>phiKMV</td>
            <td>NC_005045</td>
            <td>62</td>
			<td>0.25</td>
            <td>0.30</td>
            <td>0.31</td>		
			<td>0.29</td>
			<td>49</td>
            <td>0.52</td>
            <td>-0.88</td>	
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>Pap3</td>
            <td>NC_004466</td>
            <td>52</td>
			<td>0.26</td>
            <td>0.41</td>
            <td>0.22</td>	
			<td>0.35</td>
			<td>46</td>
            <td>0.60</td>
            <td>-0.30</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="3">Myoviridae</td>
            <td>phiCTX</td>
            <td>NC_003278</td>
			<td>62</td>
            <td>0.24</td>
            <td>0.32</td>	
			 <td>0.27</td>
            <td>0.33</td>
			<td>48</td>
            <td>0.56</td>
            <td>-0.89</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>phiKZ</td>
            <td>NC_004629</td>
            <td>36</td>
			<td>0.37</td>
            <td>0.21</td>
            <td>0.41</td>	
			<td>0.28</td>
			<td>48</td>
            <td>0.37</td>
            <td>0.17</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>EL</td>
            <td>NC_007623</td>
            <td>49</td>
			<td>0.28</td>
            <td>0.31</td>
            <td>0.28</td>	
			<td>0.35</td>
			<td>51</td>
            <td>0.53</td>
            <td>-0.33</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="4">Siphoviridae</td>
            <td>B3</td>
            <td>NC_006548</td>
			<td>63</td>
            <td>0.16</td>
            <td>0.44</td>	
			<td>0.15</td>
            <td>0.41</td>
			<td>42</td>
            <td>0.73</td>
            <td>-0.39</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>D3112</td>
            <td>NC_005178</td>
            <td>64</td>
			<td>0.17</td>
            <td>0.48</td>
            <td>0.18</td>	
			<td>0.37</td>
			<td>43</td>
            <td>0.70</td>
            <td>-0.52</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>DMS3</td>
            <td>NC_008717</td>
            <td>64</td>
			<td>0.15</td>
            <td>0.40</td>
            <td>0.18</td>	
			<td>0.41</td>
			<td>44</td>
            <td>0.70</td>
            <td>-0.63</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>D3</td>
            <td>NC_002484</td>
            <td>57</td>
			<td>0.20</td>
            <td>0.38</td>
            <td>0.23</td>	
			<td>0.39</td>
			<td>49</td>
            <td>0.63</td>
            <td>-0.55</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Inoviridae</td>
            <td>Pf1</td>
            <td>NC_001331</td>
			<td>61</td>
            <td>0.24</td>
            <td>0.33</td>	
			<td>0.24</td>
            <td>0.34</td>
			<td>47</td>
            <td>0.57</td>
            <td>-0.62</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>Pf3</td>
            <td>NC_001418</td>
            <td>45</td>
			<td>0.40</td>
            <td>0.31</td>
            <td>0.27</td>	
			<td>0.23</td>
			<td>52</td>
            <td>0.45</td>
            <td>0.30</td>			
         </tr>
		  <tr>
            <td rowspan="4">Cystoviridae</td>
            <td>Phi8L</td>
            <td>NC_003299</td>
			<td>54</td>
            <td>0.27</td>
            <td>0.38</td>	
			<td>0.22</td>
            <td>0.32</td>
			<td>48</td>
            <td>0.59</td>
            <td>-0.32</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>Phi12L</td>
            <td>NC_004173</td>
            <td>54</td>
			<td>0.32</td>
            <td>0.30</td>
            <td>0.33</td>	
			<td>0.24</td>
			<td>48</td>
            <td>0.45</td>
            <td>-0.83</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>Phi13M</td>
            <td>NC_004171</td>
            <td>57</td>
			<td>0.35</td>
            <td>0.32</td>
            <td>0.28</td>	
			<td>0.20</td>
			<td>49</td>
            <td>0.45</td>
            <td>-0.52</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>Phi6L</td>
            <td>NC_003715</td>
            <td>55</td>
			<td>0.29</td>
            <td>0.33</td>
            <td>0.28</td>	
			<td>0.28</td>
			<td>52</td>
            <td>0.52</td>
            <td>-0.49</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>Leviviridae</td>
            <td>PP7</td>
            <td>NC_001628</td>
			<td>54</td>
            <td>0.28</td>
            <td>0.28</td>	
			<td>0.29</td>
			<td>0.31</td>
            <td>56</td>
            <td>0.50</td>	
			<td>-0.53</td>		
         </tr>
     </tbody>
 	  </table>
	  <table-wrap-foot>
  				<fn>
  					<p>a Gene Bank Accession No. ,The no. assigned by database NCBI (USA), NC stands for NCBI code number.</p>
					<p>b % GC, GC content.</p>
					<p>No. of genes per Phage as downloaded from database.</p>
  				</fn>
  			</table-wrap-foot>
 	</table-wrap>
	<table-wrap position="float" id="t3">
	<label>Table 3.</label>
  			<caption>
  				<title>Correlations coefficient between the positions of genes along the first two major axis with different
parameters.</title>
  			</caption>
   <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
      <thead>
         <tr>
            <th align="left">AXIS</th>
            <th align="left">A3</th>
            <th align="left">T3</th>
			<th align="left">G3</th>
			<th align="left">C3</th>
			<th align="left">GC3s<sup>a</sup></th>
			<th align="left">Nc<sup>b</sup></th>
            <th align="left">GRAVY</th>			
         </tr>
      </thead>
      <tbody>
         <tr>
            <td>First</td>
            <td>-0.043</td>
            <td>-0.104</td>
			<td>0.067</td>
            <td>0.261<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>0.502<sup>&ast; &ast;</sup></td>	
			<td>-0.134</td>
            <td> 0.139</td>			
         </tr>
         <tr>
            <td>Second</td>
            <td>0.163</td>
            <td>0.018</td>
			<td>-0.290<sup>&ast; &ast;</sup></td>
            <td>-0.498</td>
            <td>-0.384<sup>&ast; &ast;</sup></td>	
			<td>0.014</td>
            <td>0.255</td>			
         </tr>
         </tbody>
 	  </table>
	  <table-wrap-foot>
  				<fn>
  					<p>&ast; &ast; Correlation is significant at the P-value &lt; 0.01 level.</p>
					<p>&ast; Correlation is significant at the P-value &lt; 0.05 level.</p>
					<p><sup>a</sup> GC<sub>3s</sub>, is the frequency of (G + C ) content in the phage gene.</p>
					<p><sup>b</sup> N<sub>c</sub>, The effective number of codons used by a gene.</p>
  				</fn>
	</table-wrap-foot>
 	</table-wrap>
	<table-wrap position="float" id="t4">
	<label>Table 4.</label>
  			<caption>
  				<title>RSCU values of each codon for the two groups of genes located at the extreme ends of the first major axis as determined by CA, Each group contains 10% of sequences located on the two extremes of the first major axis.</title>
  			</caption>
   <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
      <thead>
         <tr>
            <th align="left">AA</th>
            <th align="left">Codon</th>
            <th align="left">RSCU<sup>a</sup></th>
			<th align="left">N<sup>a</sup></th>
			<th align="left">RSCU<sup>b</sup></th>
			<th align="left">N<sup>b</sup></th>	
			<th align="left">AA</th>
			<th align="left">Codon</th>
            <th align="left">RSCU<sup>a</sup></th>
			<th align="left">N<sup>a</sup></th>
			<th align="left">RSCU<sup>b</sup></th>
			<th align="left">N<sup>b</sup></th>			
         </tr>
      </thead>
      <tbody>
         <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Phe</td>
            <td>UUU</td>
            <td>0.00</td>
			<td>0</td>
            <td>1.11</td>
            <td>5</td>	
			<td rowspan="4">Ser</td>
            <td>UCU</td>
            <td>0.57</td>
			<td>2</td>
            <td>0.94</td>
            <td>20</td>			
         </tr>
         <tr>
            <td>UUC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>2.00</td>
            <td>11</td>
			<td>0.89</td>
            <td>4</td>
            <td>UCC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
			<td>2.29</td>
			<td>8</td>
            <td>0.70</td>
            <td>15</td>			
         </tr>
         <tr>
            <td rowspan="6">Leu</td>
            <td>UUA</td>
            <td>0.00</td>
			<td>0</td>
            <td>0.67</td>
            <td>3</td>
			<td>UCA</td>
            <td>0.00</td>
			<td>0</td>
            <td>1.03</td>
            <td>22</td>			
         </tr>
         <tr>
            <td>UUG<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>0.63</td>
            <td>6</td>
			<td>1.78</td>
            <td>8</td>
            <td>UCG<sup>&ast;</sup></td>		
			<td>0.57</td>
			<td>2</td>
            <td>1.55</td>
            <td>33</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>CUU</td>
            <td>0.53</td>
            <td>5</td>
			<td>0.67</td>
            <td>3</td>
            <td rowspan="4">Pro</td>
			<td>CCU</td>
            <td>0.75</td>
			<td>3</td>
            <td>1.03</td>
            <td>16</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>CUC</td>
            <td>0.74</td>
            <td>7</td>
			<td>0.67</td>
            <td>3</td>            
			<td>CCC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.00</td>
			<td>4</td>
            <td>0.71</td>
            <td>11</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>CUA</td>
            <td>0.32</td>
            <td>3</td>
			<td>0.44</td>
            <td>2</td>            
			<td>CCA</td>
            <td>0.75</td>
			<td>3</td>
            <td>1.16</td>
            <td>18</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>CUG<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>3.79</td>
            <td>36</td>
			<td>1.78</td>
            <td>8</td>            
			<td>CCG<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.50</td>
			<td>6</td>
            <td>1.10</td>
            <td>17</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="3">Ile</td>
            <td>AUU</td>
            <td>0.52</td>
			<td>7</td>
            <td>0.33</td>
            <td>1</td>	
			<td rowspan="4">Thr</td>
            <td>ACU</td>
            <td>0.17</td>
			<td>1</td>
            <td>0.64</td>
            <td>13</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>AUC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>2.40</td>
            <td>32</td>
			<td>2.33</td>
            <td>7</td>            
			<td>ACC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>2.26</td>
			<td>13</td>
            <td>1.14</td>
            <td>23</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>AUA</td>
            <td>0.08</td>
            <td>1</td>
			<td>0.33</td>
            <td>1</td>            
			<td>ACA</td>
            <td>0.35</td>
			<td>2</td>
            <td>0.79</td>
            <td>16</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
		 	<td>Met</td>
            <td>AUG</td>
            <td>1.00</td>
            <td>16</td>
			<td>1.00</td>
            <td>16</td>            
			<td>ACG</td>
            <td>1.22</td>
			<td>7</td>
            <td>1.43</td>
            <td>29</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="4">Val</td>
            <td>GUU</td>
            <td>0.57</td>
			<td>3</td>
            <td>0.29</td>
            <td>1</td>	
			<td rowspan="4">Ala</td>
            <td>GCU</td>
            <td>0.68</td>
			<td>20</td>
            <td>0.57</td>
            <td>6</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
		 	<td>GUC</td>
            <td>1.52</td>
            <td>8</td>
            <td>2.00</td>
			<td>7</td>
            <td>GCC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>            
			<td>2.15</td>
            <td>63</td>
			<td>0.48</td>
            <td>5</td>            		
         </tr>
		  <tr>
		 	<td>GUA</td>
            <td>0.76</td>
            <td>4</td>
            <td>0.57</td>
			<td>2</td>
            <td>GCA</td>            
			<td>0.79</td>
            <td>23</td>
			<td>1.71</td>
            <td>18</td>            		
         </tr>
		  <tr>
		 	<td>GUG<sup>*</sup></td>
            <td>1.14</td>
            <td>6</td>
            <td>1.14</td>
			<td>4</td>
            <td>GCG</td>            
			<td>0.38</td>
            <td>11</td>
			<td>1.24</td>
            <td>13</td>            		
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Tyr</td>
            <td>UAU</td>
            <td>0.44</td>
			<td>2</td>
            <td>1.20</td>
            <td>3</td>	
			<td rowspan="2">Cys</td>
            <td>UGU</td>
            <td>0.00</td>
			<td>0</td>
            <td>0.67</td>
            <td>7</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
		 	<td>UAC</td>
            <td>1.56</td>
            <td>7</td>
            <td>0.80</td>
			<td>2</td>
            <td>UGC</td>            
			<td>2.00</td>
            <td>4</td>
			<td>1.33</td>
            <td>14</td>            		
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">TER</td>
            <td>UAA</td>
            <td>0.75</td>
			<td>1</td>
            <td>0.10</td>
            <td>1</td>	
			<td>TER</td>
            <td>UGA</td>
            <td>2.25</td>
			<td>3</td>
            <td>2.32</td>
            <td>24</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>UAG</td>
            <td>0.00</td>
			<td>0</td>
            <td>0.58</td>
            <td>6</td>	
			<td>Trp</td>
            <td>UGG</td>
            <td>1.00</td>
			<td>11</td>
            <td>1.00</td>
            <td>31</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">His</td>
            <td>CAU</td>
            <td>0.25</td>
			<td>1</td>
            <td>1.25</td>
            <td>5</td>	
			<td rowspan="4">Arg</td>
            <td>CGU<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>0.69</td>
			<td>7</td>
            <td>0.20</td>
            <td>4</td>			
         </tr>
		  <tr>
            <td>CAC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.75</td>
			<td>7</td>
            <td>0.75</td>
            <td>3</td>	
			<td>CGC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>3.93</td>
            <td>40</td>
			<td>0.46</td>
            <td>9</td>          
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Gln</td>
            <td>CAA</td>
            <td>0.48</td>
			<td>7</td>
            <td>0.67</td>
            <td>4</td>	
			<td>CGA</td>
            <td>0.49</td>
			<td>5</td>
            <td>1.12</td>
            <td>22</td>			
         </tr>
		  <tr>
            <td>CAG<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.52</td>
			<td>22</td>
            <td>1.33</td>
            <td>8</td>	
			<td>CGG</td>
            <td>0.69</td>
			<td>7</td>
            <td>1.07</td>
            <td>21</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Asn</td>
            <td>AAU</td>
            <td>0.30</td>
			<td>3</td>
            <td>0.40</td>
            <td>1</td>	
			<td rowspan="2">Ser</td>
            <td>AGU</td>
            <td>0.00</td>
			<td>0</td>
            <td>0.84</td>
            <td>18</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>AAC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.70</td>
			<td>17</td>
            <td>1.60</td>
            <td>4</td>	
			<td>AGC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>2.57</td>
			<td>9</td>
            <td>0.94</td>
            <td>20</td>			
         </tr>
		  <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Lys</td>
            <td>AAA</td>
            <td>0.47</td>
			<td>9</td>
            <td>0.80</td>
            <td>4</td>	
			<td rowspan="2">Arg</td>
            <td>AGA</td>
            <td>0.10</td>
			<td>1</td>
            <td>1.53</td>
            <td>30</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>AAG<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.53</td>
			<td>29</td>
            <td>1.20</td>
            <td>6</td>	
			<td>AGG<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>0.10</td>
			<td>1</td>
            <td>1.63</td>
            <td>32</td>			
         </tr>
		  <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Asp</td>
            <td>GAU</td>
            <td>0.82</td>
			<td>18</td>
            <td>1.00</td>
            <td>3</td>	
			<td rowspan="4">Gly</td>
            <td>GGU</td>
            <td>0.56</td>
			<td>5</td>
            <td>0.11</td>
            <td>1</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>GAC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.18</td>
			<td>26</td>
            <td>1.00</td>
            <td>3</td>	
			<td>GGC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>2.56</td>
			<td>23</td>
            <td>1.00</td>
            <td>9</td>			
         </tr>
		  <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Glu</td>
            <td>GAA<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.01</td>
			<td>41</td>
            <td>1.00</td>
            <td>4</td>				
            <td>GGA</td>
            <td>0.22</td>
			<td>2</td>
            <td>1.67</td>
            <td>15</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>GAG</td>
            <td>0.99</td>
			<td>40</td>
            <td>1.00</td>
            <td>4</td>	
			<td>GGG</td>
            <td>0.67</td>
			<td>6</td>
            <td>1.22</td>
            <td>11</td>			
         </tr>
     </tbody>
 	  </table>
	  <table-wrap-foot>
  				<fn>
  					<p>The &ast; indicates the codons whose occurrences are significantly (P &lt; 0.01) higher in the group of genes on left side than the genes on the right side of first major axis.</p>
					<p><sup>a</sup> RSCU and <italic>N</italic> (the number of codons) values of genes of left group.</p>
					<p><sup>b</sup> RSCU and <italic>N</italic> (the number of codons) values of genes of right group.</p>					
  				</fn>
	</table-wrap-foot>
 	</table-wrap>
	<table-wrap position="float" id="t5">
	<label>Table 5.</label>
  			<caption>
  				<title>Correlation between RSCU values phage D3 and phage D3112 and P.syringae specific tRNA copy number anticodons.</title>
  			</caption>
   <table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
      <thead>
         <tr>
            <th align="left" rowspan="2">AA</th>
            <th align="left" rowspan="2">Codon</th>
            <th align="left" colspan="2">RSCU</th>
			<th align="left" rowspan="2">tRNA Copy No. of <italic>P.syringae</italic></th>
			<th align="left" rowspan="2">AA</th>
			<th align="left" rowspan="2">Codon</th>	
			<th align="left" colspan="2">RSCU</th>
			<th align="left" rowspan="2">tRNA Copy No. of <italic>P.syringae</italic></th>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
		 	<th align="left">D3</th>
			<th align="left">D3112</th>
			<th align="left">D3</th>
			<th align="left">D3112</th>
		 </tr>
      </thead>
      <tbody>
         <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Phe</td>
            <td>UUU</td>
            <td>0.00</td>
			<td>0.00</td>
            <td></td>
            <td rowspan="4">Ser</td>	
			<td>UCU</td>
			<td>0.57</td>
            <td>0.86</td>
            <td></td>			
         </tr>
         <tr>
            <td>UUC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>2.00</td>
            <td>2.00</td>
			<td>1</td>
            <td>UCC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>2.29</td>	
			<td>0.43</td>
            <td>1</td>			
         </tr>
         <tr>
            <td rowspan="6">Leu</td>
            <td>UUA</td>
            <td>0.00</td>
			<td>0.41</td>
            <td>1</td>
            <td>UCA</td>	
			<td>0.00</td>
            <td>2.57</td>
            <td>1</td>			
         </tr>
         <tr>
            <td>UUG</td>
            <td>0.63</td>
            <td>0.56</td>
			<td>1</td>
            <td>UCG<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>0.57</td>	
			<td>0.86</td>
            <td>1</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>CUU</td>
            <td>0.53</td>
            <td>0.00</td>
			<td></td>
            <td rowspan="4">Pro</td>
            <td>CCU</td>
			<td>0.75</td>
            <td>0.80</td>
            <td></td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>CUC</td>
            <td>0.74</td>
            <td>0.34</td>
			<td>1</td>
            <td>CCC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.00</td>	
			<td>0.20</td>
            <td>1</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>CUA</td>
            <td>0.32</td>
            <td>0.67</td>
			<td>1</td>
            <td>CCA</td>
            <td>0.75</td>	
			<td>1.80</td>
            <td>2</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>CUG<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>3.79</td>
            <td>6.00</td>
			<td>2</td>
            <td>CCG</td>
            <td>1.50</td>	
			<td>1.20</td>
            <td></td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="3">Ile</td>
            <td>AUU</td>
            <td>0.52</td>
			<td>0.75</td>
            <td></td>
            <td rowspan="4">Thr</td>	
			<td>ACU</td>
            <td>0.17</td>	
			<td>1.50</td>
            <td></td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>AUC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>2.40</td>
            <td>2.25</td>
			<td>5</td>
            <td>ACC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>2.26</td>	
			<td>1.50</td>
            <td>1</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>AUA</td>
            <td>0.08</td>
            <td>0.00</td>
			<td></td>
            <td>ACA</td>
            <td>0.35</td>	
			<td>0.50</td>
            <td>1</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>Met</td>
			<td>AUG<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.00</td>
            <td>1.00</td>
			<td>5</td>
            <td>ACG<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.22</td>	
			<td>0.50</td>
            <td></td>			
         </tr>
		  <tr>
            <td rowspan="4">Val</td>
            <td>GUU</td>
            <td>0.57</td>
			<td>0.00</td>
            <td></td>
            <td rowspan="4">Ala</td>	
			<td>GCU</td>
            <td>0.68</td>	
			<td>1.85</td>
            <td></td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>GUC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
			<td>1.52</td>
            <td>2.00</td>
            <td>2</td>
			<td>GCC</td>
            <td>2.15</td>
            <td>0.62</td>	
			<td>2</td>            	
         </tr>
		  <tr>
            <td>GUA</td>
			<td>0.76</td>
            <td>1.23</td>
            <td>2</td>
			<td>GCA<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>0.79</td>
            <td>0.62</td>	
			<td>5</td>            	
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>GUG</td>
			<td>1.14</td>
            <td>2.00</td>
            <td></td>
			<td>GCG</td>
            <td>0.38</td>
            <td>0.92</td>	
			<td></td>            	
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Tyr</td>
            <td>UAU</td>
            <td>0.44</td>
			<td>0.00</td>
            <td></td>
            <td rowspan="2">Cys</td>	
			<td>UGU</td>
            <td>0.00</td>	
			<td>1.20</td>
            <td></td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>UAC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
			<td>1.56</td>
            <td>2.00</td>
            <td>1</td>
			<td>UGC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>2.00</td>
            <td>0.80</td>	
			<td>1</td>            	
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">TER</td>
            <td>UAA</td>
            <td>0.75</td>
			<td>3.00</td>
            <td></td>
            <td>TER</td>	
			<td>UGA</td>
            <td>2.25</td>	
			<td>1.50</td>
            <td></td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>UAG</td>
			<td>0.00</td>
            <td>0.00</td>
            <td></td>
			<td>Trp</td>
            <td>UGG</td>
            <td>1.00</td>	
			<td>1.00</td>  
			<td>1</td>          	
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">His</td>
            <td>CAU</td>
            <td>0.25</td>
			<td>0.00</td>
            <td></td>
            <td rowspan="4">Arg</td>	
			<td>CGU<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>0.69</td>	
			<td>0.41</td>
            <td>2</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>CAC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
			<td>1.75</td>
            <td>2.00</td>
            <td>1</td>
			<td>CGC</td>
            <td>3.93</td>
            <td>1.03</td>	
			<td></td>            	
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Gln</td>
            <td>CAA</td>
            <td>0.48</td>
			<td>0.84</td>
            <td>1</td>
            <td>CGA</td>	
			<td>0.49</td>
            <td>2.07</td>				
            <td></td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>CAG<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.52</td>
			<td>2.00</td>
            <td></td>
            <td>CGG</td>	
			<td>0.69</td>
            <td>1.03</td>				
            <td>2</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Asn</td>
            <td>AAU</td>
            <td>0.30</td>
			<td>0.50</td>
            <td></td>
            <td rowspan="2">Ser</td>	
			<td>AGU</td>
            <td>0.00</td>	
			<td>0.00</td>
            <td>0</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>AAC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.70</td>
			<td>1.50</td>
            <td>2</td>
            <td>AGC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>	
			<td>2.57</td>
            <td>1.29</td>				
            <td>1</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Lys</td>
            <td>AAA</td>
            <td>0.47</td>
			<td>0.57</td>
            <td>2</td>
            <td rowspan="2">Arg</td>	
			<td>AGA</td>
            <td>0.10</td>	
			<td>0.41</td>
            <td>1</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>AAG<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.53</td>
			<td>1.43</td>
            <td></td>
            <td>AGG<sup>&ast;</sup></td>	
			<td>0.10</td>
            <td>1.03</td>				
            <td>1</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Asp</td>
            <td>GAU</td>
            <td>0.82</td>
			<td>0.22</td>
            <td></td>
            <td rowspan="4">Gly</td>	
			<td>GGU</td>
            <td>0.56</td>	
			<td>1.45</td>
            <td></td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>GAC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.18</td>
			<td>1.78</td>
            <td>3</td>
            <td>GGC<sup>&ast;</sup></td>	
			<td>2.56</td>
            <td>0.36</td>				
            <td>3</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td rowspan="2">Glu</td>
            <td>GAA<sup>&ast;</sup></td>
            <td>1.01</td>
			<td>1.14</td>
            <td>4</td>            
			<td>GGA</td>
            <td>0.22</td>	
			<td>1.45</td>
            <td>1</td>			
         </tr>
		 <tr>
            <td>GAG</td>
            <td>0.99</td>
			<td>0.86</td>
            <td></td>
            <td>GGG</td>	
			<td>0.67</td>
            <td>0.73</td>				
            <td>1</td>			
         </tr>
     </tbody>
 	  </table>
	  <table-wrap-foot>
  				<fn>
  					<p>(<sup>&ast;</sup>) represents putative optimal codons of phage D3.</p>										
  				</fn>
	</table-wrap-foot>
 	</table-wrap>
  </floats-wrap>
</article>
